Originally Posted by jcroft

Have you read this thread? You have missed my point completly.

1. No, it doesn't stop people. But it should.
2. Yeah, he's being punished. I think the small fine he'll get is a totally appropriate punishment and I have no objection to the way the police handled it at all.

My ONLY point when I started discussing this is that this guy is CLASSLESS and that bugs me because he's now created a national news story that shows off how we have classless people in KC. I have NO problem with the law's handling of the situation whatsoever, and I've never said anything in this thread that would suggest otherwise.

Originally Posted by jcroft

Dude, you are again, missing my point. Listen carefully while I make it very clear for you.



Now that I know more of the story, I understand why the guy spit on her. And I still think it was a classless thing to do. Nothing you can say will change my mind. Sorry.

Originally Posted by stevieray

lnobody is trying to change you're mind, you're being anal about it.

Go watch Jerry Springer, I'm sure there are plenty of people there who you can freak out over.

I'd understand your obssession if nothing happened to the guy. authorities took care of the situation, sorry that's not good enough for you, if it was, you wouldn't have wasted most of your night to proclaim over and over how much this bothers you.

Originally Posted by RaiderH8r

No, the right to free speech is granted to citizens of this country. However, men and women who fight on behalf of our rights do so to ensure that the rest of us don't have to EARN the right ourselves. This ungrateful twat went beyond protest to advocacy of the enemy. She did PR spots for the North Vietnamese condemning our soldiers for war crimes that were not committed. She felt the ends justified the means and be damned all those who were in captivity and made to listen to her bullshit. So f!ck her right in her treasonous ass, is her book selling in North Vietnam?

Originally Posted by frazod

I'm not reading through the whole thread, but as far as I'm concerned, the only thing the guy did wrong was to try to run after he did it (should have known one of her security nazis would nail him).

That fucking c#nt should have been executed as a traitor decades ago. Nothing that ever happens to her can be bad enough.

DIE YOU EVIL TRAITOROUS fuckING BITCH! :cuss:

Originally Posted by frazod

I'm not reading through the whole thread, but as far as I'm concerned, the only thing the guy did wrong was to try to run after he did it (should have known one of her security nazis would nail him).

That fucking c#nt should have been executed as a traitor decades ago. Nothing that ever happens to her can be bad enough.

DIE YOU EVIL TRAITOROUS fuckING BITCH! :cuss:

Originally Posted by jcroft

Dude, you are again, missing my point. Listen carefully while I make it very clear for you.

Of course Al Queda doesn't represent all Muslims. But plenty of Americans think it does. Why? Because they're stupid. Most of the rest of the world thinks Kansas is a crazy place because we "don't teach evoloution." Of course, that's not really accurate -- but that's what they hear. The rest of the country thinks Kansas just "banned gay marraige." Of course, we know that's not even close to being accurate -- but that's what they hear (either because of bad reporting or selective listening".

I read the article above as someone who knew NOTHING about Fonda's actions in Vietnam. The article above told me some dud spit in her face because of her protest. It didn't tell me a damn thing about what she did in protest. I assumed she held up some signs or something. Why should I have believed otherwise if the article doesn't tell me?

Now that I know more of the story, I understand why the guy spit on her. And I still think it was a classless thing to do. Nothing you can say will change my mind. Sorry.

Originally Posted by Vlad Logicslav

So we have the arbiter of Class right here in our midst. I will seek you out whenever I value your advice on being classy. Thanks

Originally Posted by Boyceofsummer

The war in Vietnam was not about defending any American interests or rights. It was about paranoia and an inability to accept the fact we were wrong. 100,000 American and French lives washed away. This is the same reasoning used by our government to stockpile over 28,000 nuclear weapons from 1959 to 1962. Vietnam and the cold war was a complete and total waste of economic and human resources. Don’t ask for a link, I’ve posted it before on this site.

Originally Posted by jcroft

Great, another story to make our area look stupid to the rest of the world. Right along with "gay marriage bans," not teaching evolution, and serial killers.

Originally Posted by Simplex3

As if we needed any further proof that you're a stupid f**king communist.

Vietnam was about keeping one country from taking over another. Pu**ies like you back here in the states putting pressure on the spineless politicians is why a war against a pissant country like North Vietnam cost 100,000 lives. We could have torched the North to the point where feeding themselves was as much work as they could do, then they wouldn't have been so anxious to fight.

As for the nukes, let's say we didn't build any while the Russians built their 30,000+. When they stepped up and said "surreneder or die", what would you have done there smart guy?

Originally Posted by Boyceofsummer

The war in Vietnam was not about defending any American interests or rights. It was about paranoia and an inability to accept the fact we were wrong. 100,000 American and French lives washed away. This is the same reasoning used by our government to stockpile over 28,000 nuclear weapons from 1959 to 1962. Vietnam and the cold war was a complete and total waste of economic and human resources. Don’t ask for a link, I’ve posted it before on this site.

Originally Posted by Mojo Rising

pinko-commies