ChiefsPlanet
Page 11 of 20 « First 78910 11 12131415 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft Bradford Please (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=199979)

Brock 01-09-2009 10:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5372423)
I can't believe people are saying they weren't impressed at all by Bradford last night. I understand he operates primarily out of the shotgun and his program requires him to get the calls from the sidelines. We don't know if he is capable or able to make reads and adjustments on his own. But aside from that, the kid threw a nice ball and was very accurate. His deep balls were on the money.
Yep. I've been thinking for a while now that he's very underrated around here.

jspchief 01-09-2009 10:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5372423)
I can't believe people are saying they weren't impressed at all by Bradford last night. I understand he operates primarily out of the shotgun and his program requires him to get the calls from the sidelines. We don't know if he is capable or able to make reads and adjustments on his own. But aside from that, the kid threw a nice ball and was very accurate. His deep balls were on the money.
It's a by-product of the need to support another choice at QB. If I like player X, then player Y and Z suck by default.

El Jefe 01-09-2009 10:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5372428)
Yep. I've been thinking for a while now that he's very underrated around here.
Yep, I got blasted one time when I said I would be happy if he was a Chief. I think he is going to be a good QB, the kid is very accurate.

BigChiefFan 01-09-2009 10:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5372423)
I can't believe people are saying they weren't impressed at all by Bradford last night. I understand he operates primarily out of the shotgun and his program requires him to get the calls from the sidelines. We don't know if he is capable or able to make reads and adjustments on his own. But aside from that, the kid threw a nice ball and was very accurate. His deep balls were on the money.
Some only see what THEY WANT TO SEE. Bradford looked great. The loss wasn't on him, the fictitious, bogus argument about him having all the weapons, proved last night, that some are biased and have been using a BOGUS argument against Bradford. Some of us have been saying it for months, but the deaf, dumb, and blind kids on this board, sure play a mean pinball and they've got the masses fooled into thinking Bradford doesn't measure up. It's quit humorous, actually.

kepp 01-09-2009 10:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5372423)
I can't believe people are saying they weren't impressed at all by Bradford last night. I understand he operates primarily out of the shotgun and his program requires him to get the calls from the sidelines. We don't know if he is capable or able to make reads and adjustments on his own. But aside from that, the kid threw a nice ball and was very accurate. His deep balls were on the money.
Agreed. Last night's game raised my opinion of him. His two INTs, IMO, were not his fault at all and most of his throws were dead-on. I'd still want Stafford or Sanchez before him, but I wouldn't complain about Bradford.

beach tribe 01-09-2009 10:21 AM
"YAAAY! Tebow!! We want Tebow!!!"
:spock: Are you serious?

King_Chief_Fan 01-09-2009 10:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 5372483)
Some only see what THEY WANT TO SEE. Bradford looked great. The loss wasn't on him, the fictitious, bogus argument about him having all the weapons, proved last night, that some are biased and have been using a BOGUS argument against Bradford. Some of us have been saying it for months, but the deaf, dumb, and blind kids on this board, sure play a mean pinball and they've got the masses fooled into thinking Bradford doesn't measure up. It's quit humorous, actually.
Bradford needs to stay in school.

Reerun_KC 01-09-2009 10:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 5372483)
Some only see what THEY WANT TO SEE. Bradford looked great. The loss wasn't on him, the fictitious, bogus argument about him having all the weapons, proved last night, that some are biased and have been using a BOGUS argument against Bradford. Some of us have been saying it for months, but the deaf, dumb, and blind kids on this board, sure play a mean pinball and they've got the masses fooled into thinking Bradford doesn't measure up. It's quit humorous, actually.
one could say the same thing about you. YOUR only seeing what you want to see.... And your arguement is Bogus...

Mr. Laz 01-09-2009 10:23 AM
last night Bradford was let down by his receivers. He stood in there and delivered the ball even though he knew he was about to get clocked.

that said, i still think Stafford has better NFL potential



Bradford's delivery is weird

his hand is sort "under" the ball like his hand is too small

delivery is a bit slow

it's sort of sidearm and reminds of ty detmer for some reason


i think it will be a problem in the NFL

penguinz 01-09-2009 10:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 5372495)
"YAAAY! Tebow!! We want Tebow!!!"
:spock: Are you serious?
In the right situation I think Tebow will be a productive QB in the NFL.

Reerun_KC 01-09-2009 10:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan (Post 5372499)
Bradford needs to stay in school.

This....

Even the Gameday Crew said whomever drafts Bradford will have to be patient, Bradford is going to have a HUGE learning curve, going from a spread, look to the sideline for his binky, to learning how to read a defense and call audibles...

King_Chief_Fan 01-09-2009 10:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 5372409)
It might be a question about him imposed by the system, but it's not a failure of his making.
agree... but he will not hit the ground running in the NFL. A team that chooses him will have to be patient and develop him. I think he will be successful but not right away.

The Chiefs have always sucked at developing a QB.

Mr. Laz 01-09-2009 10:26 AM
btw ...... Bradford won't stay in school and probably shouldn't

apparently he's gonna lose his entire offensive line and next year the sooners quarterback is gonna get raped.

Bradford will be a top 10 pick so he should bolt while the bolting is good.

Chiefnj2 01-09-2009 10:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan (Post 5372511)
agree... but he will not hit the ground running in the NFL. A team that chooses him will have to be patient and develop him. I think he will be successful but not right away.

The Chiefs have always sucked at developing a QB.
Which is part of the reason he should go back to school. The only QB who has a chance to play from the get go, IMO, is Stafford because he's played a few years.

King_Chief_Fan 01-09-2009 10:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5372519)
Which is part of the reason he should go back to school. The only QB who has a chance to play from the get go, IMO, is Stafford because he's played a few years.
yup


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:37 PM.
Page 11 of 20 « First 78910 11 12131415 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.