ChiefsPlanet
Page 11 of 65 « First 78910 11 121314152161 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft Neither Stafford or Sanchez belong in top 10 (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=202838)

the Talking Can 02-21-2009 06:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5513672)
ROFL can, i like sanchez, rated by most as the #2 qb in the draft, stafford i have watched freeman too, freeman DOES NOT impress me, stafford's physical attributes do, his mental makeup doesnt, it's the way he carries himself, the way he acts when he gets sacked, throws an int, or the WR drops a pass, i dont like it. i could give 2 shits how that makes YOU feel
what games are you talking about?

one of the things i like best about him is the ability to bounce back, he never gets gun shy....look at the bowl game...terrible first half, almost perfect second half...that's clutch, that's mental toughness.....

he had to carry his team, he had the pressure of scoring every time, with 3 freshman starting on his OL, because their defense was so bad...christ Kentucky put up 38 on them...so he had to put up 42...no one ever put 30 on USC....

he had to force things - unlike Sanchez who had the best defense in college, which I point out not to criticize, just to compare - and when he made a mistake he came right back and kept slinging it....and yet, he had the same number of ints as Sanchez, 10....but he gets criticized for poor judgment and Sanchez doesn't....this why context matters, and no one ever wants to discuss it...

frankly listening to you i have no idea what you watched, or if you were actually paying attention...i haven't seen any evidence from you, yet, that you know anything about the team he played on or why they played the way they did....


the guy was a 3 year starter in the SEC, won 3 bowl games, and beat a dozen ranked teams in 3 years....don't tell me "pees his pants" in big games...that is ****ing reeruned, and flat out ignorant...

SAUTO 02-21-2009 06:33 PM
who did he play for again?:D come on man i dont like him, i said why its a feeling. now i see that im not the only one that feels that way we CAN disagree

the Talking Can 02-21-2009 06:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5513900)
who did he play for again?:D come on man i dont like him, i said why its a feeling. now i see that im not the only one that feels that way we CAN disagree
i don't give a shit about your feelings....feelings are for morons

we have facts....

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-21-2009 07:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie (Post 5513807)
Well, then you are calling mecca unelievably stupid because he said that. When describing the sainted sanchez the terms big and strong armed were used. I compared that to what they used to say about bledsoe and mecca said hed be happy to be able to get a qb as good as bledsoe with the third pick since the words franchise qb are being used to describe stafford and sanchez and the need out of any qb the chiefs may draft to be a "franchise qb" then mecca feels bledsoe fits this model

The draft is "his thing". Then he's got the nerve to call others morons.
Posted via Mobile Device
Do you have an actual TAKE to broadcast here, or are you going to just keep going back and forth with your Superiors like the butt hurt hobbit-bitch that you clearly are?
I anxiously await your Football Knowledge!

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-21-2009 07:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie (Post 5513853)
If you draft a guy thinking he's a franchise player, an elway, a manning, an Aikman, and he turns into a Bledsoe, believe me, a fanbase is not happy with that.

If PIoli thinks stafford is an elway he will and should pick him. If he feels he's getting Bledsoe I doubt he will.
Posted via Mobile Device
Who gives a flying **** what this 60% window-licking fanbase thinks?!

milkman 02-21-2009 07:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey23545 (Post 5513502)
Oh, great, we've gone from the BPA philosophy of drafting to the WBAGPANY (Won't Be Any Good Players Available Next Year) philosophy....
There are a lot of factors that have to weigh into draft decisions.

Best player and positional value are important, and when you're a team with as many holes as the Chiefs you have to have an eye on the next draft.

Ultra Peanut 02-21-2009 08:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5513855)
I ****ing love dipshit true fans.

They offer dumbass takes like "We should take Crabtree or Curry at 3" or "We should trade down and take Sanchez at 10" when the only teams willing to trade up with us would be the very teams that would take Sanchez.
If we just keep trading down, we can grab all of the sixth- and seventh-round picks and take the players we want while everyone else reaches!

Coach 02-21-2009 08:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5513742)
...Coming from the person that just says "Scott Pioli yadda yadda" that means alot...

Anyone and I mean anyone that thinks you take a right tackle with a top 5 pick is a moron there is no way around that.
Totally agree. Makes no economical sense to pick a top 5 for a RT, where you can find some solid ones out there in the FA market.

soundmind 02-21-2009 08:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach (Post 5514174)
Totally agree. Makes no economical sense to pick a top 5 for a RT, where you can find some solid ones out there in the FA market.
This take assumes a little that we address a couple players in FA on DEF: DL and LB specifically

:Poke: I'm assuming from statements much like this one, which I agree with, that you've settled on Albert as your LT for the long haul? Because, for the sake of debate, I can't say I'd have a problem with them taking Monroe with the #3 (play him @ LT), and moving Brandon across the pile to RT...unless that's not something he can do of course...

I realize and sympathize with the need for the QB, and to be honest, if either of these kids have "it" - take them...but presuming they don't, for the sake of debate...I have ZERO problem with a dominant LT.

Pioli Zombie 02-21-2009 08:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5513999)
Who gives a flying **** what this 60% window-licking fanbase thinks?!
Who gives a flying **** what YOU think?
Posted via Mobile Device

Reerun_KC 02-21-2009 08:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie (Post 5514214)
Who gives a flying **** what YOU think?
Posted via Mobile Device
Hey look its a mirror!

http://www.lakewoodconferences.com/d...med_Mirror.jpg

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-21-2009 08:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie (Post 5514214)
Who gives a flying **** what YOU think?
Posted via Mobile Device
Again, still waiting for your Gridiron Brilliance, Professor Asshat!

Pioli Zombie 02-21-2009 08:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by soundmind (Post 5514207)
This take assumes a little that we address a couple players in FA on DEF: DL and LB specifically

:Poke: I'm assuming from statements much like this one, which I agree with, that you've settled on Albert as your LT for the long haul? Because, for the sake of debate, I can't say I'd have a problem with them taking Monroe with the #3 (play him @ LT), and moving Brandon across the pile to RT...unless that's not something he can do of course...

I realize and sympathize with the need for the QB, and to be honest, if either of these kids have "it" - take them...but presuming they don't, for the sake of debate...I have ZERO problem with a dominant LT.
Excellant post. This is exactly what I'm saying. Prepare to be attacked for it. :)
Posted via Mobile Device

the Talking Can 02-21-2009 09:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by soundmind (Post 5514207)
This take assumes a little that we address a couple players in FA on DEF: DL and LB specifically

:Poke: I'm assuming from statements much like this one, which I agree with, that you've settled on Albert as your LT for the long haul? Because, for the sake of debate, I can't say I'd have a problem with them taking Monroe with the #3 (play him @ LT), and moving Brandon across the pile to RT...unless that's not something he can do of course...

I realize and sympathize with the need for the QB, and to be honest, if either of these kids have "it" - take them...but presuming they don't, for the sake of debate...I have ZERO problem with a dominant LT.
we already have a dominant LT

Pioli Zombie 02-21-2009 09:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5514219)
Again, still waiting for your Gridiron Brilliance, Professor Asshat!
About what? Do you have a question, ass hole?
Posted via Mobile Device


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:54 AM.
Page 11 of 65 « First 78910 11 121314152161 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.