![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sensible was a Herm supporter? If so, it's amazing that the mods haven't had a bit of fun with his username. |
Quote:
And as far as Bradford goes, to call him "better" than Mark is just ****ing laughable. There is NO QB in the 12 South that is worth a flying **** as an NFL prospect. Sorry, but them's the breaks! |
Quote:
|
Don't argue with Mecca about Sanchez he knows everything so much so he declined on being a scout so he could share his knowledge on Chiefsplanet. He's also said USC has no talent.
|
We need so much its hard to not look at all the top picks ...
|
Two things on this.
First up is this: Quote:
My second point: Can anyone name me another college QB with just 16 starts (or even fewer) who was drafted in the top 5? And if so, how did they do in the NFL? Honestly -- I'm not saying Sanchez isn't worth the pick, and realize there have been successful QBs who weren't four-year starters. Just wondering if anyone with such little experience was ever drafted that high, and if someone like Mecca (or another draftnik) has already done the research on this. Thanks in advance for anyone who can answer that one. MM ~~:thumb: |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
How the **** are people freaking out about what appears to be an unbelievably small sample size? |
"Experts" say and think the same as Mecca...
Well, they better by golly!! You know what happens if they don't....... |
Quote:
Me personally, I want Stafford. He's clearly the better pick, and I hope he falls into our lap. If he's not there, I don't know what the hell to think. |
I dont believe we will be taking Sanchez at 3 no matter what. I trust Pioli knows what he's doing. After all he helped build 3 super bowl winning teams this decade.
Whoever it is they pick, i hope they nail it. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.