ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs A dash of Curry solidifies Chiefs defense. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=203480)

DeezNutz 03-02-2009 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5546799)
I really don't even care anymore. This is a shitty year to draft #3. I wanted Stafford and would settle for Sanchez but it doesn't matter now because we traded for Cassel who hopefully isn't a one year wonder(odds are he is though). We drafted a LT last year and don't need another, Crabtree isn't a top WR most years, and LB'ers just aren't worth a top three pick. The best possible thing we can do is trade down but I doubt that happens. Personally I feel Haley drafts Crabtree though, if not he gets another LT and moved Albert to OG to help keep Cassel up-right. Curry I think would be the last option, I feel sorry for the Chiefs if Pioli is such a bad drafter he can't find LB's outside of the top 3.

I'd rather see the Chiefs draft Maclin than Crabtree at #3. This would not be a smart move, but it would be better than selecting Crabtree, IMO.

RedThat 03-02-2009 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5546799)
I really don't even care anymore. This is a shitty year to draft #3. I wanted Stafford and would settle for Sanchez but it doesn't matter now because we traded for Cassel who hopefully isn't a one year wonder(odds are he is though). We drafted a LT last year and don't need another, Crabtree isn't a top WR most years, and LB'ers just aren't worth a top three pick. The best possible thing we can do is trade down but I doubt that happens. Personally I feel Haley drafts Crabtree though, if not he gets another LT and moved Albert to OG to help keep Cassel up-right. Curry I think would be the last option, I feel sorry for the Chiefs if Pioli is such a bad drafter he can't find LB's outside of the top 3.

I think were gonna trade down. We've got Scott Pioli and It's just the New England way of doing things.

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-02-2009 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5546811)
I'd rather see the Chiefs draft Maclin than Crabtree at #3. This would not be a smart move, but it would be better than selecting Crabtree, IMO.

A ****in' men. Crabtree does not jazz me in the slightest anymore. We need a burner, his foot is jacked, and will it ever be the same?

Is he worth 3rd overall salary? **** no.

eazyb81 03-02-2009 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedBull (Post 5546817)
I think were gonna trade down. We've got Scott Pioli and It's just the New England way of doing things.

I am going to be shocked if there's a team that wants to trade up to #3 this year.

Tribal Warfare 03-02-2009 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 5546567)
Until someone gives an example of a player that played LB in college and successfully made the transition to 3-4 OLB, the point is moot.

only two I can think of are LT and Derrick.

DeezNutz 03-02-2009 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5546822)
A ****in' men. Crabtree does not jazz me in the slightest anymore. We need a burner, his foot is jacked, and will it ever be the same?

Is he worth 3rd overall salary? **** no.

Neither is Maclin, though. I like him better than Ginn, but not nearly enough for #3. It would not be a "smart" selection.

bdeg 03-02-2009 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5546678)
They're going to have to make SEVERAL exceptions if they plan on going 3-4 right away.

None of our existing DL would be ideal starters in a 3-4. Some of them might be backups at various positions, but we have no starters.

DJ is a starting ILB in a 3-4. Other than him and Vrabel (who might be a backup at this point) we have no starters at LB, either.

Pollard MIGHT be a decent SS in a pressure D. Page has no position, and both of our CB's are zone guys who might struggle in a pressure D.

By my count, your scenario of not making exceptions would require us to get TEN new defensive players this offseason. That's not going to happen.

Page isn't a perfect safety, but what about the 3-4 hurts him?

MOhillbilly 03-02-2009 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 5546825)
I am going to be shocked if there's a team that wants to trade up to #3 this year.

did you feel that way after this weekends trade?

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-02-2009 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5546833)
Neither is Maclin, though. I like him better than Ginn, but not nearly enough for #3. It would not be a "smart" selection.

Nobody is worth the three to us now.

RustShack 03-02-2009 11:35 AM

I really think Its between Crabtree or a LT for the Chiefs.

bdeg 03-02-2009 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5546694)
I'd agree if he did anything well, ran well, played the run well something..

Hell I think Brian Johnston has a better shot of being a 3-4 role guy out there than Hali does.

Now I think Flowers will be fine, and I don't particularly like the safeties and most of the front 7 needed to be replaced anyway.

Brian Johnston might shine.

I don't think Flowers will be hurt as much as people think.

Mecca 03-02-2009 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5546799)
I really don't even care anymore. This is a shitty year to draft #3. I wanted Stafford and would settle for Sanchez but it doesn't matter now because we traded for Cassel who hopefully isn't a one year wonder(odds are he is though). We drafted a LT last year and don't need another, Crabtree isn't a top WR most years, and LB'ers just aren't worth a top three pick. The best possible thing we can do is trade down but I doubt that happens. Personally I feel Haley drafts Crabtree though, if not he gets another LT and moved Albert to OG to help keep Cassel up-right. Curry I think would be the last option, I feel sorry for the Chiefs if Pioli is such a bad drafter he can't find LB's outside of the top 3.

Wait till you see the thread that says the Lions were gonna trade for Cassell...

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-02-2009 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5546855)
I really think Its between Crabtree or a LT for the Chiefs.

Left Tackle please.

HC_Chief 03-02-2009 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5546871)
Left Tackle please.

Depends on how our coaching staff views Albert -v- whatever LT is available (most ratings have Monroe #1).

If we're going to reach at #3, might as well reach for need. Maclin fills two roles of need (slot WR and returner). Raji fills a need (NT). Everett Brown fills a need (rush LB in 3-4), Rey Maualuga (ILB run-stuffing attacking backer in 3-4)

bdeg 03-02-2009 11:44 AM

A slot wr/returner that would be even worse at 3 than Curry or essentially taking a RT.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.