ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Croyle haters, eat up (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=213982)

DBOSHO 09-13-2009 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6068756)
But people on this board keep suggesting that Thigpen has no place on an NFL roster and that Gutterrez was easily the choice for #3. And yet, Thigpen is the active one while Gutterrez is not.

I know Thigpen isn't that good right now. I just can't stand the exaggeration that he doesn't belong on an NFL roster. I think #3 QB is perfect for him too. Haley's said they've been working with him on his footwork and on playing in a pro set. I just don't understand why people are so opposed to him getting that chance to learn it.

Cause they wanna kick a man while hes down.

Groves 09-13-2009 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 6066955)
Thiggy's future is at Lambert's. "The home of Throwed rolls."

Those rainbow passes are easy for the customers to catch.


I dunno about the other locations, but in Ozark, there's flags hanging from the ceiling everywhere, and the rainbow toss doesn't deliver. You gotta sling it, and some throwers just don't cut the mustard.

Norman Einstein 09-13-2009 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6068621)
Dude, I like Tyler Thigpen too, but I don't understand what you're arguing about here. Croyle played well given the shitty offensive line support today. Thigpen is a long way behind in terms of learning a pro style offense--he looked better today, but in the preseason, it was clear he needed some work on his mechanics and footwork.

There's nothing to argue here. Croyle started, as he should have. And he did well given the circumstances.

The point is that Thigpen is not as bad as gogoat has said. He has talents that are valuable, if he didn't he wouldn't be where he is.

Making a determination of a players worth on three downs in a game with virtually no snaps during the week is just plain stupid. i.e. gogoat.

Norman Einstein 09-13-2009 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6068670)
He's been tougher and stronger this year, that you can not deny. And I'll go out on a limb and say that I DO feel comfortable with him at #2, and I trust him at #2.
And unlike Tyler The ****ing Hobbit Thigpen, Croyle has shown us he can function in a pro style offense, and doesn't need a ****ing college offensive scheme to make something happen.

The days of that Mickey Mouse Spread-horseshit are OVER with the Kansas City Chiefs, and that makes Tyler The ****ing Hobbit Thigpen an expendable asset.
Good riddance and case..****ing..closed.

Your argument shows you are as stupid as gogoat. One game and you have announced him as the second coming of Christ. Let me give you a little hint that might help you. The Chiefs lost the game. If your boy was as good as you are trying to tell us he would have had a first down way earlier than he did.

Croyle is not a waste of time and Thigpen is just as good in the way he plays the game. Given equal practice snaps the outcome of the games would be the same. The way the games are played would be different because they play the game differently. Get real and just accept the fact that Thigpen is on the roster because he is better than you think.

FAX 09-13-2009 09:29 PM

Stats wise, he performed pretty well considering the vast amount of NFL experience he's had. Hell, Thigpen's played more regular season snaps than Croyle.

I didn't see the game, but I imagine he saw a lot of pretty big Ravens pretty close up pretty much all day long.

FAX

doomy3 09-13-2009 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6068670)
He's been tougher and stronger this year, that you can not deny. And I'll go out on a limb and say that I DO feel comfortable with him at #2, and I trust him at #2.
And unlike Tyler The ****ing Hobbit Thigpen, Croyle has shown us he can function in a pro style offense, and doesn't need a ****ing college offensive scheme to make something happen.

The days of that Mickey Mouse Spread-horseshit are OVER with the Kansas City Chiefs, and that makes Tyler The ****ing Hobbit Thigpen an expendable asset.
Good riddance and case..****ing..closed.

http://www.legaljuice.com/judge%20le...el%20funny.gif
NEXT!



This is funny because just last night you said you didn't think he should even be on the roster.

doomy3 09-13-2009 09:34 PM

Posted by RoR yesterday at 6:43 PM:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6060065)
I never made Guitierrez out to be a bad QB, and he has a better chance to do something should Cassel go down than the other two. Period.
Croyle and Thigpen ****ing SUCK, Thigpen especially. Croyle is slow as molasses, overthrows/underthrows, and Thigpen is Thigpen; enough said on THAT front.

I don't give a **** if Garcia thinks he's Paris Hilton; he's better as one QB than Thigpen and Croyle are as two, regardless of age. And WCO or no, don't tell me he can't dink and dunk, KC style, down the field.
In case you hadn't noticed, we don't exactly throw long passes. Vertical or otherwise.


Sweet Daddy Hate 09-13-2009 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CTTCS_WLR (Post 6068837)
Your argument shows you are as stupid as gogoat. One game and you have announced him as the second coming of Christ. Let me give you a little hint that might help you. The Chiefs lost the game. If your boy was as good as you are trying to tell us he would have had a first down way earlier than he did.

Croyle is not a waste of time and Thigpen is just as good in the way he plays the game. Given equal practice snaps the outcome of the games would be the same. The way the games are played would be different because they play the game differently. Get real and just accept the fact that Thigpen is on the roster because he is better than you think.

Yeah, NO.

Let me give you a little hint, you ****ing asshat:

The ONLY reason your boyfriend is on this ****ing roster, is because of his performance it St. Louis; he took it right up the ass and sucked his way on to a roster spot because he obliterated his trade value.

OH, WE ALL HAVE SEEMED TO CONVENIENTLY FORGOTTEN ABOUT THAT LITTLE FACTOID, NOW DIDN'T WE?!

And I can guaran-****ing TEE YOU that Pioli is kicking himself in the ass every time he has to look at that little shit, for not taking a 5th when it was offered!

So **** you, **** your boyfriend, **** your attitude, and don't waste anymore of my time with your utter lack of knowledge and reality.

doomy3 09-13-2009 10:06 PM

Who the **** knows if we were actually offered a fifth for him. 1 Arrowhead Drive is Fort Knox, but somehow that information is going to get out? I find it strange that some people believe everything they hear, even if it is speculation.

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-13-2009 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CTTCS_WLR (Post 6068814)
The point is that Thigpen is not as bad as gogoat has said. He has talents that are valuable, if he didn't he wouldn't be where he is.

Making a determination of a players worth on three downs in a game with virtually no snaps during the week is just plain stupid. i.e. gogoat.

Being able to not die when hit and running ability are pretty ****ing far down the list when it comes to talents required for a QB.

He has no poise, footwork, mechanics, arm strength, ability to read a defense, situational awareness, or competency from under center...but aside from that, he's a ****ing great QB prospect.

Jesus Christ, he's a ****ing white Willie Beamen.

chiefzilla1501 09-13-2009 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6068864)
This is funny because just last night you said you didn't think he should even be on the roster.

Exactly. Pioli and Haley thought he was good enough for the roster. Period. That has nothing to do with playing favorites. And that's in light of a 4th string QB who isn't exactly horrendous.

bringbackmarty 09-13-2009 10:20 PM

Croyle was a great qb today. That was a top notch defense, playing with a lead at home, he still almost found a way to win, with virtually no help. I think our receivers are better than we thought, and the line is worse.

I guess Castle is in next week, He'll look great against choadland.

It wouldn't surprise me if we end up missing out on the better quarterback because of the castle injury deal.

I think Brodie is the better QB for us VS Oakland.

chiefzilla1501 09-13-2009 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bringbackmarty (Post 6069065)
Croyle was a great qb today. That was a top notch defense, playing with a lead at home, he still almost found a way to win, with virtually no help. I think our receivers are better than we thought, and the line is worse.

I guess Castle is in next week, He'll look great against choadland.

It wouldn't surprise me if we end up missing out on the better quarterback because of the castle injury deal.

I think Brodie is the better QB for us VS Oakland.

I was thinking the same thing too, only because it took Croyle a full half to really look comfortable. But the argument against that is that he was playing a mammoth of a defense and he hasn't had any reps with the first team.

Cassel's had a lot of practice and preseason game reps with the first team, so I expect him to be ready from the get-go. Couple that with the Arrowhead advantage.

Norman Einstein 09-14-2009 05:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6069001)
Yeah, NO.

Let me give you a little hint, you ****ing asshat:

The ONLY reason your boyfriend is on this ****ing roster, is because of his performance it St. Louis; he took it right up the ass and sucked his way on to a roster spot because he obliterated his trade value.

OH, WE ALL HAVE SEEMED TO CONVENIENTLY FORGOTTEN ABOUT THAT LITTLE FACTOID, NOW DIDN'T WE?!

And I can guaran-****ing TEE YOU that Pioli is kicking himself in the ass every time he has to look at that little shit, for not taking a 5th when it was offered!

So **** you, **** your boyfriend, **** your attitude, and don't waste anymore of my time with your utter lack of knowledge and reality.

"you and all of your she/he girlfriens use statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination."

Sweet Daddy Hate 09-14-2009 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CTTCS_WLR (Post 6069527)
"you and all of your she/he girlfriens use statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination."

You are the biggest dumbass I have ever seen.

Ever.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.