I wasn't "wrong", ****STICK.

He's pretty easy to "neutralize" due to his flat-feet and not so nimble moves.

Again, Dumbass, he's not a ****ing Pro Bowl player. He's just someone you have to account for each week.

Unlike the other 10 guys on the field.

You are wrong as usual

Why do you think the other team has to account for him?

Cuz he's just 'complimentary'.....

Bringing up his flat feet and not so nimble moves....lol.

Funny, he was in on a three man rush that actually got pressure on Romo. Amazing, what with his flat feet and not so nimble moves.

He gets doubled and he still has to play his coverage responsibilities in base defense. And, he still gets pressure regularly.

I don't go through threads to prove what other people said. Frankly, I don't have the time.

But, even now, you don't give him the credit that he is due.

Big surprise.... color me shocked.

The draftubators have never been right about anything except guessing each other's colored underwear

They (me) weren't right about Jackson being a stupid ****ing pick at #3?


Wait for it.....

''THERE WASN'T ANYBODY ELSE THERE FOR US!"

"IT'S TOO EARLY TO TELL!"

''THIS DRAFT SUXED!"

ROFLROFL

Is that what a drafturbator is? Someone who argues about the draft?

I've been using the term to mean someone who overvalues draft picks, usually at the expense of current players.

I see why guys are just so annoyed with them. They are a bunch of self important jerks who take turns dutch ruddering each other on a pointless fan message board.

Even still, they have had good points at times. They just really have an inflated opinion of themselves and devalue any opinion that is not in line with their own.

So it's established that Jackson was a stupid pick?

you think it was a good pick?

They rudder each other all right. They each take turns with each other except for NoNutz he is the designated catcher I am sure you can guess why.

Okay, I have not been 'enamored' with the Jackson pick.

The difference is that I at least try to understand where the team is going, and why they do what they do.

Is he who I would have chosen? No. But, do I understand why they did it? Do I think they had better options? Yes. Do I think he is a huge mistake? No. A huge bust? No.

The thing about Herm and Pioli... they would rather draft guys that like football over a guy that has more talent who isn't as motivated.

A guy like DJ or Ryan Sims will never be drafted by Pioli. Now, Jackson may never be a superstar... but he is a high effort player.

You have to draft guys that love the game, and it is even better if you can draft guys that love to work at the game. There is a difference.

And, there are many guys who only play for the money and fame. And, IF those guys don't have success, they are more likely to put less into it rather than more.

The other kind of kid is determined. If they don't have success they work harder.

Hey, **** you, Asswipe.

How many sacks does Hali have through 5 games?

TWO.

TWO through 5 games.

Wow, that's amazing.

Go **** yourself.

Yeah, and you're such a contributor around here.

You're ****ing more worthless than that sack of shit you just quoted.

Go back to the DC and spew some more of your patented bullshit, okay?

Leave the football talk to those who actually know something about the game.

Cockbreath.

NTTATWWT.