And that means exactly what?

Asamoah took no snaps at center in any regular season or PS game. He started at guard for the entirety of his college career. Practicing at center in college. Wow.

I guess the Patriots should start giving Edelman reps as the scout team QB since he played the position in college, or perhaps the Bears should play Urlacher at safety.

We could play Berry at quarterback since that's what he played in high school. Cassel could be our tight end. (Shit, he couldn't possibly be any worse than Pope.)

But then, we did put Branden Albert at left tackle after he played guard his entire college career and the majority around here seem fine with that ongoing project.

Apparently, Chiefs fans love moving guys to brand new positions after never having played them.

Lilja will remain at RG. Remember Waters was originally brought in to play center and if he could have fit the ball under his ass when snapping it probably would still be there. Asamoah WILL start somewhere so that leaves Waters to either play LG, C or be traded since he won't be a backup. So Waters slides to C or Asamoah plays C if BOTH are still on the team. Do you dispute that fact? Personally I think Waters makes the more natural transition especially with his experience.

Again, I ask what do you THINK will happen?

It speaks to what the team might be thinking about using him at a different position. I don't advocate moving him. I'm just trying to figure out whether or not it's plausible that the Chiefs might move him to Center. It seems odd to me that the Chiefs would mention that he practiced at Center in his profile (second sentence of the section, no less) if it didn't mean anything. That's not to say that it necessarily does mean something, but it provides a little insight.

Now I know why you're in the red.

:facepalm:

They learned that from the other side of the parking lot.

Yeah, I guess my first Rep under the new system came from Hamas for this. I think is upset he would have lost our loser leave the board bet last year on Bradford having a better Rookie QB rating then Sanchez.

"There more then that IMO like Rivers and Orton, but that's a whole different arguement.

Throwing accuracy and leadership abilities are the most important qualities in a QB. Football IQ and durability are up there as well, but college system is way down the line of things teams now look at. That's why I knew Bradford would be a success in the NFL despite all the nay sayers on the board. Accuracy and leadership were never in question with him.

It's also the reason despite all the 1st round QB grades this year, I'm not a fan of guys like Locker and Mallet who are missing one or the other of the key makings of a good QB. Gabbert and Newton I believe have both of those so they can play in the league. It's just a matter of being able to take it to another level.
"

Dude, you bitch but never give your take. Who will play and who will sit?

You never give it a rest do you?

In spite of the the fact that Albert still hasn't mastered the position, in the last two years, he has given up one fewer sack than Ryan Clady, the guy that everyone points to as the psoter boy LT.

Your boy, Russel Okung, gave up 4 sacks in 10 games.

How the **** do I know? The personnel decisions have been questionable throughout Haley's tenure.

Furthermore, there's no CBA, we're weeks away from the Combines and months away from the draft. Trying to predict who will be the opening day starters on the offensive line is an exercise in futility.

Predicting shit seems to be 1/2 the post on the boards right now including the MUTHER ****ING WEATHER!

Every football discussion on this board is an exercise in futility.

While Albert and Richardson were far from perfect this past season, you know as well as anyone that the interior of the Chiefs offensive line was the real culprit in their failures to convert on third down and in short yardage situations.

Also, as much as I hope the Chiefs upgrade their center and right guard positions (with Asamoah, at least IMO, being an upgrade over Lilja), the Chiefs had the #1 rushing attack in the NFL and that line protected a mediocre QB with questionable decision making, yet threw for 27 TD's and 7 INT's.

Again, I hope the Chiefs upgrade the interior but they have far greater needs than offensive tackles.

I completely disagree.

It's one thing to discuss the weekly successes and failures of the offense, defense, special teams and coaching decisions, which are completely and undoubtedly unrelated to "predicting" who will line up on the offensive line, especially when there's no CBA, no Combine, no draft and no free agency.

However, you are posting in the draft forum.