He didn't get to the Superbowl. Dane counts that as a fail. I presume you must also.

Personally, I think it's a good start. The odds are still against him making it to a Superbowl though, IMO.

You take an educated risk, we should have taken Sanchez last year, but no.

That's all I've been saying. You take an educated risk when it makes sense. I don't think it makes sense this year. Do you?

Absolutely, it makes sense every year as long as you don't have a franchise QB on your roster.

HE'S 22 YEARS OLD GODDAMNIT!

****!:mad:

So who do you pick with the #5?

Well of course it depends on who goes before him, and I will get ripped for this, but I really like Bradford.

I also like Berry if he is there, playmaker!

oh FFS, why is this fanbase satisfied with mediocrity?!?

OK. If you like Bradford, I'm not going to argue with you. If we draft him, I hope he turns into a hall of famer.

My personal preference is for Berry. A Tennessee fan friend of mine loves him and has nothing but good things to say about him. Apparently Lane Kiffin said he was one of the smartest and hardest working football players he's ever been around. (Of course, you can't really trust anything Lane Kiffin says, LOL). He's also apparently a model citizen off the field. Those things and the fact that he's a stud player make for a pretty solid combination.

and you're a ridiculous, puffed up, completely ridiculous impotent shitbag. You're pathetic. Somehow you feel like you have some sort of status on an internet forum that allows you to enact some sort of dominant type A behavior? I bet you're a ****ing janitor. Or worse, I bet you work in a cubicle doing pointless data entry and kiss ass for a living. That might explain your attitude.

Weak. Anytime you'd like to discuss in person, you shoot me a pm, chief. You sure do like to call people pussies under cover of the interwebs. Let's just call this what it is: YOU are a joke. Everyone here knows it. Shitheads like you drive thinking folks away from this site based on your juvenile bullshit. No more GAZ, for example-to actually talk football with respect.

You're a joke, Dane. Now clean your room before your mom grounds you.

no, according to Dane, you just take best QB on the board whenever you pick in round one until you get Johnny Unitas. Because, with no offensive line, no running game, no WR's, and no defense, Johnny Unitas will still be Johnny Unitas. Pay no attention to Joey Harrington, Heath Schuler, David Carr, Tim Couch, Rick Mirer, Byron Leftwich (yep, that's a first round QB pick!) Matt Leinart , Akili Smith, Jamarcus Russell...because whether or not you thought Russell was worth the top pick overall NOBODY would've said he wasn't worth a #1 SOMEWHERE...
And there you are. Like no other position, you just never know with QB's. If you don't have a longterm answer, yeah, I think you need to draft one every friggin' year until you do. But according to dipshit Dane's own math, you have a 60% chance of doing so in rounds other than ONE. So there you go.

By the way, I'd take one if I thought there was one worthy. I just generally don't think so. Matt Ryan was the last one that I personally thought was tempting. I don't think you should take one just because he's the 'highest rated' and a 'first round value'. Bullshit. Jamarcus was first round 'value' on any board. Can't read a defense to save his life. So what does that tell you?

According to Dane, you should draft him every year regardless, until he works out. Whatever. Dipshit.

You're going a bit overboard here.

That Al Davis is the ****ing idiot we always knew him to be?

But thanks for playing Carl! We miss you buddy!

no, I used to love this site, and was a regular at the old Star site before it. I used to really enjoy talking football-even with those I disagreed with, but with a certain civility general decency that has been sorely lacking in the last few years. I don't have to agree with you. I'll respect your opinion though, if you have anything at all to back it up.

I'm going overboard? I've been called derogatory names for voicing my opinion, called a pussy, for chrissakes, but I AM GOING OVERBOARD by calling that shitheel out? Really?

I think there ought to be a bit more of my 'overboardness' around here. I think it ought to be acceptable to have different ****ing opinions here without cowardly internet bullies that like to call names from dark corners of their mothers' basements.

I've been lurking here a lot, because I DO miss talking about my favorite team and football in general, and I certainly don't agree with you on a LOT of fronts, Mecca, but I don't see you going HERE, where Dane goes, with stupid namecalling bullshit. He's a coward. I don't buy this whole 'it's just my internet persona, dude' crap that people like him like to put forward. Asshole in print is an asshole in person, sorry to say. If you're not willing to say it in person to someone's face, perhaps you should self edit.

You have to take Dane for what he is, I've been personally attacked numerous times by several posters, it happens.