I'm honestly not even sure what the **** this means, but to spare you the the awkward virtual silence...

ROFL

That's the thing, Milk.

The guys I've been advocating are younger guys that WOULD start on this team.

OJ Otogwe
Ryan Clark
Dwan Edwards
Kevin Walter
Chester Pitts (stopgap, but at least talented)

This fanbase is content with not only stopgaps, but stopgaps that are marginal players.

LeKevin Smith? Justin Fargas?

Get the **** out of here.

And FTR, I won't be upset if they sign Thomas Jones, I just think it's a ridiculous waste considering RB's are a dime-a-dozen, and we all know what happens to RB's after they hit 30.

This franchise should take a page from the Colts draft playbook. Draft a back. Use him up. Release him. Rinse, repeat.

Signing RB's in FA is a monumentally bad decision, IMO.

You are making comparisons based on one year LOL. You also have no sense in ecomonics either. I'm not going to buy a microwave that only works for 2 years when I can buy basically the same product that will last longer.

Neither of these guys are long-term options. Both Chambers and Walters are effective, but not stud receivers. Chambers at 35 and Walters at 33 aren't exactly the guys I want on this receiver corps when we're hopefully making a playoff push several years from now.

This isn't a signing I'm crushed about. Both of them are stopgaps. Nobody should look at either of these guys as being even close to a 5-year solution.

Sure, you need stopgaps.

But not a roster full of them.

This comes down to who was available. Walters got over 4 million a year having never caught for more than 899 yards in a year. 8 TD's was the most he had in a year and that's double his 2nd highest total.

IMO, the only thing Walters has over Chambers is that he's 3 years younger. We know what Chambers can do in this offense. I also don't see why Chambers can't be a good option for 3-4 years. Wideouts can play into their mid 30's easy.

I'm not saying Walters wouldn't have been a good get, but Chambers is established here. There's no reason to think he'll do any worse than he did last year.

Walters isn't a long term option? You're a ****ing dumbass. Please go to Jonestown and see if theres anymore Kool Aid left to drink.

He was the #1 option for 4 games while Bowe was out.

How much do you want to bet Chambers was targeted more than Bowe? For ****s sake some games Long got targeted more than Bowe. Did you even watch the games?

Speaking of which, any possibility Haley might actually, you know, develop Bowe this year instead of playing stupid games?

Bowe runs too far for Cassel.

Yes, genius...the most recent one.
And in that one... Chambers outplayed the younger WR.

Walter isn't going to be a 5 year solution.
I don't know why you suggested that.
I would much rather re-sign Chambers as a #2 who can stretch the field (something that he's better at than Walter) and DRAFT his replacement.

C'mon, Flop.

How can you expect a guy that hasn't been consistent over the last 5 seasons to magically maintain that level of play here - as he's aging?

You know, if he had consistently put up 800+ yards over the past 5 years, I wouldn't have nearly the issue.

Problem is, he hasn't. He had an average year catching punts from Matt Cassel, people forget about his past, and now he's a legit WR2?

It doesn't work that way. Unless you're just going out of your way to be optimistic, I see no evidence to lead me to believe that Chambers will replicate his performance of 2009.

cassel will have more time with Okong blocking for him

It's painfully obvious you don't watch the games.

What about the 2 years before where Walters outplayed Chambers?

Care to explain why Walter isn't a 5 year option other than it's made up and makes your argument look better?