I don't know about all that.

Ok I over exaggerated. Sorry. Doesn't mean he doesn't deserve a chance in the league but not for the Chiefs.

Pray for Bray:grovel:

Figured this belongs here.


Via Matt Miller. @nfldraftscout

Do not want.

At this rate, his draft weekend could be reminiscent of this guy:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_K1MvYV76DV...my-clausen.jpg

This guy couldn't even scout Dane's taint

If he's going to have any success post-college, it is going to have to be in a WCO, IMO.

Quoting the Bleacher Report. Awesome.

Good thing the assessment didn't come from him but rather from THREE ACTUAL NFL SCOUTS then.

http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/...Talk-8525.html

1. Matt Barkley, Southern California. He is the undisputed top guy right now, but there is a chance he could be passed. One scout said he would not put Barkley in Andrew Luck’s class, but he would put him in Robert Griffin III’s class. That isn’t to say he is a similar player to Griffin, however. Barkley lacks ideal height as Griffin does (some scouts believe he is shorter than the 6-2 he is listed as), but he is not as mobile and won’t make as many second chance plays. He also is a better pocket passer, with decent arm strength and accuracy.


We wouldn't want to be objective would we?

What?

You said Miller wasn't a good judge of talent.

I said Miller didn't say it was HIS evaluation, he was passing on the opinions of 3 NFL scouts.

The above post makes no sense whatsoever.

Bleacher report is the same as War Paint Illustrated.

So?

Again, you said he wasn't a good talent evaluator.

You didn't say his sources were shit.