![]() |
Quote:
Yes joeckel would be a long te move. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
If they are signing or tagging Albert its likely to play lt, hence we will probably look elsewhere at #1.
At this point I don't know what they look at there though so anyone's guess is as good as mine |
Quote:
And joeckel to my knowledge has never played eithe spot so that's probably not working out. |
Either way I'm off to bed
Enjoyed it patteu |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Signing/tagging Albert AND drafting Joeckel would be so incredibly dumb.
A huge ****ing waste of a 1st rd pick. |
You'd have to be a buffoon to want the team to not resign Albert only to blow the number one pick by not improving a 2-14 team with it.
|
Who the **** is Alberts?
Why is our fan base comprised of 2/3 reeruns? |
First, what no one even begins note, is that last season was only Albert's 4th season in his playing career at the. LT position.
He had to learn on the job essentially, and has just started to touch his potential. He still has more upside, and hasn't even come close to reaching his cceiling, and he is already a top LT. If you want to argue that Joekel. Has more potential, I would disagree with argument. Second, to patteau's idea, it simply is not a sound financial decision. Forget the fact that you'd be paying LT money to guard. With your plan, with the rookie slotting, you would be committing 15 to 16 mil a year to just 2 line positions. Not a sound Llotment of. |
ALBERT IS NOT A GUARD JFC
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.