ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Rishaw Johnson penciled in as RG starter (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=283135)

ct 04-22-2014 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10578350)
Also, the OL created room for Knile Davis just fine. Could it be that Gray ****ing sucks? :hmmm:

ahem...THIS

OldSchool 04-22-2014 01:49 PM

Zach Martin is very much in play for pick 23.

Just think about it. We have little else behind Fisher and Stephenson, Allen sucks, RG is unsettled, and Martin can fit into any of those positions to become Andy Reid's next Evan Mathis. Both Reid and Dorsey love versatility in their OL players. It's too good to be true for them if Martin falls to 23.

ct 04-22-2014 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10578362)
I'm in the same boat as you are. I'm a fan of Rishaw Johnson only because he represents not drafting offensive line in the first round.

I do have some hope (or maybe it's the koolaid) that he's got some playa in him. I'll take a former 6th round OG who they very much liked but couldn't stick on a superbowl caliber roster over a 1st round OG anyday. Yet I admit it could be the koolaid.

ct 04-22-2014 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10578378)
Zach Martin is very much in play for pick 23.

Just think about it. We have little else behind Fisher and Stephenson, Allen sucks, RG is unsettled, and Martin can fit into any of those positions to become Andy Reid's next Evan Mathis.

Ah I remember a few drafts ago, how excited I was when the Giants took Ron Dayne, when so freakin many drafturbators had us on his jock. DAMN I was so relieved!!!

Also add in a similar story for big Mike Williams going to Detroit, whew, major bullet dodged!

I look forward to Zach Martin getting selected before 23.

RealSNR 04-22-2014 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10578378)
Zach Martin is very much in play for pick 23.

Just think about it. We have little else behind Fisher and Stephenson, Allen sucks, RG is unsettled, and Martin can fit into any of those positions to become Andy Reid's next Evan Mathis. Both Reid and Dorsey love versatility in their OL players. It's too good to be true for them if Martin falls to 23.

Reid loved Danny Watkins for the same reasons.

And Martin gives us a guard replacement. If Fisher or Stephenson go down, do you REALLY want him stepping in at tackle? I mean, Jeff Allen would have been in the exact same position to step in at tackle if need be, only one year removed from being the starting LT all three years in college. But we never even considered him as a swing option for guard or tackle.

I'm fine with versatility from our backups. That's just fine and dandy. But I don't want our starting guard shifting over in the middle of a game and bringing up the backup to fill his spot. That makes ZERO sense. You've basically got TWO backups filling in instead of one in that case. Dumb. Dumb dumb dumb.

**** Zach Martin. **** Su'a Filo. **** Chance Warmack. **** David DeCastro. **** Mike Iupati.

**** drafting guards in the first round. Ever.

-King- 04-22-2014 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10578299)
Linkenbach sucked dick with the Colts.

Schwartz didn't suck dick with the Vikings. He played pretty well, actually.

:spock: Schwartz didn't start a single game for the Vikings.

The Franchise 04-22-2014 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 10578513)
:spock: Schwartz didn't start a single game for the Vikings.

He didn't say that he started did he? He said he played well for them.

-King- 04-22-2014 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10578519)
He didn't say that he started did he? He said he played well for them.

How the hell can you tell that? Schwarz only came in as an extra lineman or during field goals that year. He had less than 10 snaps in the majority of games that season.

Schwartz is terribly overrated on this forum. He's not even an average guard. There's a reason he's started more than 3 games only twice in his career.

Mr. Laz 04-22-2014 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10578378)
Zach Martin is very much in play for pick 23.

Just think about it. We have little else behind Fisher and Stephenson, Allen sucks, RG is unsettled, and Martin can fit into any of those positions to become Andy Reid's next Evan Mathis. Both Reid and Dorsey love versatility in their OL players. It's too good to be true for them if Martin falls to 23.

not going to happen ... Johnson,Hudson,kush etc are going to compete for the RG spot.

There will be a viable WR there at #23 to take like Cook or Lee. Unless someone falls unexpectedly that we decide it too good to pass up.

Saccopoo 04-22-2014 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10578409)
Reid loved Danny Watkins for the same reasons.

And Martin gives us a guard replacement. If Fisher or Stephenson go down, do you REALLY want him stepping in at tackle? I mean, Jeff Allen would have been in the exact same position to step in at tackle if need be, only one year removed from being the starting LT all three years in college. But we never even considered him as a swing option for guard or tackle.

I'm fine with versatility from our backups. That's just fine and dandy. But I don't want our starting guard shifting over in the middle of a game and bringing up the backup to fill his spot. That makes ZERO sense. You've basically got TWO backups filling in instead of one in that case. Dumb. Dumb dumb dumb.

**** Zach Martin. **** Su'a Filo. **** Chance Warmack. **** David DeCastro. **** Mike Iupati.

**** drafting guards in the first round. Ever.

Man, I really wanted them to draft Alex Mack back in 2009.

****ing Gus Bradley knows how to build a team.

The Franchise 04-22-2014 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 10578538)
How the hell can you tell that? Schwarz only came in as an extra lineman or during field goals that year. He had less than 10 snaps in the majority of games that season.

Schwartz is terribly overrated on this forum. He's not even an average guard. There's a reason he's started more than 3 games only twice in his career.

Backups can't play well.....got it.

-King- 04-22-2014 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10578550)
Backups can't play well.....got it.

They're backups for 6 years for a reason.

RealSNR 04-22-2014 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 10578538)
How the hell can you tell that? Schwarz only came in as an extra lineman or during field goals that year. He had less than 10 snaps in the majority of games that season.

Schwartz is terribly overrated on this forum. He's not even an average guard. There's a reason he's started more than 3 games only twice in his career.

Not everything can be said about a player in his resume, dude. I don't know why you, Sac, and sapho are making such a big deal about the "Four teams in four yearsssszzzz!!!!" crap. He's STARTED games before he came to us as a reserve lineman. When he came here as a reserve lineman, he played WELL for us. Does any other shit ****ing matter other than that? When James Harrison got his first starts for the Steelers, did they give a shit about his up-and-down resume before looking to him for the next season?

I don't care if he came in as just a guy. When he played for us, it was okay. He wasn't this massive ****up like Linkenbach has only ever been his entire career with the Colts. We KNOW what Schwartz is, and that's consistency. That's his entire value. It's not Will Shields, but he doesn't need to be. He doesn't even need to be a top 10 guard, which he's not. That's all I or anybody has ever said about him. I fail to see how that in any way is overrating the player.

And if you want to still call it overrating, then I'd rather overrate Schwartz than draft guard at #1, and I'd rather start Schwartz than Rishaw Johnson or Jeff Linkenbach.

OldSchool 04-22-2014 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 10578544)
not going to happen ... Johnson,Hudson,kush etc are going to compete for the RG spot.

There will be a viable WR there at #23 to take like Cook or Lee. Unless someone falls unexpectedly that we decide it too good to pass up.

So you hope.

TEX 04-22-2014 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10578580)
So you hope.

Naw, I think he's got more than just hope here. This is a deep draft and there will be a good WT there.

Regarding the RG position, their actions suggest that the reason they let Schwartz and Asuckamoah walk is because they felt they had their replacement on the roster. Id be shocked if they go Guard at 1.23.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.