ChiefsPlanet
Page 11 of 11 « First 78910 11
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Andy Reid is Sorry (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=288804)

ILChief 12-03-2014 08:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Williams (Post 11164893)
When this hire went down, my first reaction was, "they're trying to recreate the 90's". And you and I know the drill on that decade ALL to well.

The only problem is, Reid ****ing sucks within his own division now and we've become 90's San Diego.

Success!
90's San Diego went to a Super Bowl

Rausch 12-03-2014 08:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILChief (Post 11164908)
90's San Diego went to a Super Bowl
We're not them then...

Reerun_KC 12-03-2014 08:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Williams (Post 11164893)
When this hire went down, my first reaction was, "they're trying to recreate the 90's". And you and I know the drill on that decade ALL to well.

The only problem is, Reid ****ing sucks within his own division now and we've become 90's San Diego.

Success!
This fan base wants the 90s so bad. Well Reid will bring it. Parking lot full. Hope for playoff noise is resounding. Failure will reign = full stadium.

Shit franchise will always be shit.

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-03-2014 08:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILChief (Post 11164908)
90's San Diego went to a Super Bowl
My bad. I thought they didn't take off until after the turn of the century.

I was referring to "Seau the only legit player while Chiefs stomp that ass"-era SD.

stevieray 12-03-2014 09:34 PM
gotta be honest. just don't care, been listening to the same BS excuses for so long, it's just seems futile.

even the debates about the team are getting STALE.

Rausch 12-03-2014 09:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 11165060)
gotta be honest. just don't care, been listening to the same BS excuses for so long, it's just seems futile.

even the debates about the team are getting STALE.
This.

Different actors - same story...

Simply Red 12-03-2014 10:43 PM
Gets criticized for not running Charles enough.

Runs Charles more - rip off like 3 wins straight.

Face toughest competition in a CRITICAL game.

Decides to run Charles 10 times.

Gets ass kicked at home.

....Great plan bud!

Simply Red 12-03-2014 10:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OctoberFart (Post 11164183)
You could put Andy in green and switch out Charles for Westbrook and you dudes sound like Eagles fan's 7 years ago.
You seem nice to me.

ViperVisor 12-04-2014 12:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 11165182)
Gets criticized for not running Charles enough.

Runs Charles more - rip off like 3 wins straight.

Face toughest competition in a CRITICAL game.

Decides to run Charles 10 times.

Gets ass kicked at home.

....Great plan bud!
KC only ran about 40 plays on offense.
0 Carries in the 4th quarter because down 2 scores.

This past game was not getting too clever going zig zig zig because nobody would expect that.

And it's not like KC has a dominant run game. They have a HOF back.
To make it work Reid and co have to think up ways to cheat and steal some openings for Jamaal to run through.

Do you think they want to spend time doing this? No. But they have to because the OL sucks.
If KC had a decent OL you would have to reason not to expect Jamaal to be fed the ball in big games.

He did get a decent portion of the plays early in the game and 10 for 35 yards isn't good.

vailpass 12-04-2014 01:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViperVisor (Post 11165266)
KC only ran about 40 plays on offense.
0 Carries in the 4th quarter because down 2 scores.

This past game was not getting too clever going zig zig zig because nobody would expect that.

And it's not like KC has a dominant run game. They have a HOF back.
To make it work Reid and co have to think up ways to cheat and steal some openings for Jamaal to run through.

Do you think they want to spend time doing this? No. But they have to because the OL sucks.
If KC had a decent OL you would have to reason not to expect Jamaal to be fed the ball in big games.

He did get a decent portion of the plays early in the game and 10 for 35 yards isn't good.
Honest question: is Jamaal already a HOF back? If his career ended today does he get in?

Ragged Robin 12-04-2014 02:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 11159360)
With our OL, lack of WR's, and shit stained DB's, I am SHOCKED that we are 7-5. It's a ****ing miracle this team has done what it has done, in spite of the Front Office reeruns. This isn't anywhere close to being a Good playoff team. It's a jumbled mess of puzzle pieces, and nothing really fits. I am surprised Denver didn't beat us by 30. Seriously.

I was immensely pissed off the last two games, but not at the players. This colossal mess belongs to Dorsey and his dumb **** staff. Not even attempting to address some of the basic needs for this Team was criminal. Deepest WR draft in decades and we take Dee Ford? BRILLIANT!
This x100. Limp roster has been overachieving thus far

EPodolak 12-04-2014 04:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Headcreeps (Post 11158571)
the last playoff spot will come down to you fruits and the chargers on the last game of the season and you will lose.

You will win a superbowl in the year 2037
Thank God. I was worried.

We'll be the Manchester Chiefs or something by then.

ThaVirus 12-04-2014 11:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 11165271)
Honest question: is Jamaal already a HOF back? If his career ended today does he get in?

We've had this conversation on here many times.

The answer is no.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:33 PM.
Page 11 of 11 « First 78910 11
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.