|
Quote:
A guy like Gladney would make a lot more sense since we are thin on talent at the CB position. A Gladney - Cushenberry - Moss as your top 3 would be one hell of a draft. |
Just finished The Draft Networks Mock Simulator and feel it was pretty accurate:
1. Murray ILB 2. Hall CB 3. Moss RB 4. Bredson IOL 5. Gandy-Golden WR |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The draft is super deep at that position. They have already their established top 4 WRs for next year. They already have what looks likely to be their 1WR in Hill and 2WR in Hardman for the next few years. If they draft a WR it will likely be round 3 or later but they could very well not draft one before next year. |
A lot of people say that the interior oline is terrible how can a running back fix the running game? If there are no holes to run thru more times than not there is nothing the back can do and if the runner can make something happen with no holes he won't be around when the Chiefs draft. If the line is opening holes pretty much any back can make yards. If Murray or Queen aren't there at 32 try and trade back draft
someone to play right guard 2-5 and depending on how many picks are obtained maybe a center. Fisher, Rankin, Reiter, draftee, Schwartz. Algrettie (spelling?) is still her after a year of learning who could possibly play center. |
I'm not sure why CP is fixated on KC drafting a center @ #32....they just beat (arguably) the best d-line in football to win a SB....with a terrible interior line (if you listen to this forum)
No one has ever won a championship because their center took over a game.....you can get one later in the draft. If Mahomes were 34 and no longer mobile...yeah...maybe. Chiefs o-line is serviceable... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
So are elite LT's. So are elite DT's. So are elite QB's. So are elite WR's. So are elite any thing. There is a reason why it is called elite. Elite players are difference makers, period. Regardless of their position. |
Quote:
It's what we do. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I wouldn't discount taking a safety though; remember that we have shown a preference for versatility. Other than the outside CB's, we don't really line up in a traditional set so much as put guys on the field with versatile skillsets. It's kind of like....we have linemen, we have linebackers, and we have defensive backs. A guy like Jeremy Chinn, for example might be a real interesting chess piece; sort of a Honey Badger that is a LB/S hybrid to go with Mathieu's S/CB hybrid. |
Quote:
I think Fulton wasn't quite as mobile as Reid would prefer. I think Reiter is not nearly as good as either. Just my thoughts. |
Quote:
But an elite fatty is still an elite player, and can have a big effect on your offense. I'm not picking a hill to die on, I trust Veach and Reid to make the call. I'm just saying we've got playmakers all over. One more playmaker may not make that much difference, but a stud offensive lineman could make more of a difference than people think. |
Quote:
Are Cesar Ruiz or Lloyd Cushenberry elite guys, though? Really? Doesn’t seem to be the consensus. |
Quote:
I think it could very well be that NFL teams view the prospects differently. Erik McCoy lasted until the 2nd last year and he looked like a great pick. https://www.si.com/nfl/saints/editor...iew-erik-mccoy I think Cushenberry might even be better than McCoy but the reason he isn't on your mock draft list is he jumped from last year to this year. Many of these lists favor guys that were already "supposed to be there" in the summer. These same mock draft people said nothing about KJ Hamler and now every day I am seeing him on TV and suddenly getting featured on ESPN. Was he on the mock draft lists as an top prospect?! Nope. But someone at ESPN got told he's going high now. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:19 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
