ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft *****2022 NFL DRAFT THREAD - NO SPOILERS***** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=343596)

UChieffyBugger 04-28-2022 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16266115)
I like it.

Mafe's age scares me a bit but whatever.

I just can't see how they would leave Dotson or Pickens on the board for a 24 year old DE but we'll see.

The Franchise 04-28-2022 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger (Post 16266155)
I just can't see how they would leave Dotson or Pickens on the board for a 24 year old DE but we'll see.

If they drafted Dotson over any of those DEs I mentioned.....it would be ****ing stupid.

UChieffyBugger 04-28-2022 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16266157)
If they drafted Dotson over any of those DEs I mentioned.....it would be ****ing stupid.

Hell he's even left Wyett, Elam and Booth completely out of the first round and I can't see KC taking Mafe over them tbh.

staylor26 04-28-2022 09:13 AM

They really need to maximize those top 50 picks.

We should be able to come away with 3 really good players.

Whether they trade up from 29, and/or trade back from 30, or up from 50, just move around to make sure you get the most out of those first 3 picks.

The Franchise 04-28-2022 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger (Post 16266168)
Hell he's even left Wyett, Elam and Booth completely out of the first round and I can't see KC taking Mafe over them tbh.

Wyatt? Maybe.

Why would they take Elam or Booth when they just took Gordon?

UChieffyBugger 04-28-2022 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16266178)
Wyatt? Maybe.

Why would they take Elam or Booth when they just took Gordon?

Because both are better than Gordon??

MahomesMagic 04-28-2022 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16266157)
If they drafted Dotson over any of those DEs I mentioned.....it would be ****ing stupid.

I like the player. Just think most years his value is mid 2nd.

The Franchise 04-28-2022 09:17 AM

I think my prediction right now is:

Trade up for Karlaftis. My guess is jumping Arizona at 23...most logical spot is the Pats at 21.
Elam, Booth or Gordon at 30 but a trade down could be possible. Hopefully not down far enough to where they miss out on one of those CBs.
WR at 50....maybe a slight trade up to get one.

After I said all that....they'll probably take Gordon at 29, trade down from 30 and grab Drake Jackson and George Pickens in the 2nd.

TomBarndtsTwin 04-28-2022 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16266113)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Filed my final mock draft for ESPN last Friday. Obviously a lot has changed since then. <br><br>Here&#39;s my best guess based on what I&#39;m hearing now. <a href="https://t.co/Q7irJUg8ln">pic.twitter.com/Q7irJUg8ln</a></p>&mdash; Matt Miller (@nfldraftscout) <a href="https://twitter.com/nfldraftscout/status/1519679873261850627?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 28, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Mafe and Gordon.

There's a lot of mock drafts that have Gordon to the Chiefs and I'm here for all of them.

IF the draft were to unfold similar to this, and Karlaftis is sitting there at #21 when the Pats turn comes up, I think KC would prefer him to Mafe and might package #29 and that last fourth (#135) to move up and get him.

Pats are notorious for wanting to move back and add picks and their asking price usually isn't too high, so I think a late 4th could get it done (maybe throw in a 7th too). If Pats like the LB from Georgia (Walker), they could likely still get him at #29.

Chiefs get Karlaftis at #21, and agree that they still grab Gordon at #30 (assuming he's there and they keep the pick, versus trading back into the 2nd for more picks).

Rasputin 04-28-2022 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16266140)
Also Matt Cassel is in GMFB and he is terrible LMAO

<img src="https://i.imgur.com/fdMgN3X.gif" alt="Just play it off... - GIF on Imgur"/>


Spoiler!

RunKC 04-28-2022 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16266176)
They really need to maximize those top 50 picks.

We should be able to come away with 3 really good players.

Whether they trade up from 29, and/or trade back from 30, or up from 50, just move around to make sure you get the most out of those first 3 picks.

I’ll only be pissed if we take a player that is not on the field. No more Dee Ford’s that sit for a year before they do anything.

Need every player we draft in the first 2 rds (at least) on the field get in playtime week 1

Sassy Squatch 04-28-2022 09:24 AM

The only surprising thing Veach could do today for me is trade down.

Rasputin 04-28-2022 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TomBarndtsTwin (Post 16266187)
IF the draft were to unfold similar to this, and Karlaftis is sitting there at #21 when the Pats turn comes up, I think KC would prefer him to Mafe and might package #29 and that last fourth (#135) to move up and get him.

Pats are notorious for wanting to move back and add picks and their asking price usually isn't too high, so I think a late 4th could get it done (maybe throw in a 7th too). If Pats like the LB from Georgia (Walker), they could likely still get him at #29.

Chiefs get Karlaftis at #21, and agree that they still grab Gordon at #30 (assuming he's there and they keep the pick, versus trading back into the 2nd for more picks).

Yeah i said Andy has a history with BB they would be a prime suitor to trade up with and probably not cost a lot but I'd only do it for DE like Karlaftis.

O.city 04-28-2022 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16266195)
I’ll only be pissed if we take a player that is not on the field. No more Dee Ford’s that sit for a year before they do anything.

Need every player we draft in the first 2 rds (at least) on the field get in playtime week 1

Depends who they take. If they're really building for the future, they need to prioritize long term instead of ready day 1

staylor26 04-28-2022 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16266195)
I’ll only be pissed if we take a player that is not on the field. No more Dee Ford’s that sit for a year before they do anything.

Need every player we draft in the first 2 rds (at least) on the field get in playtime week 1

That’s not as important for me.

Preferably, they have an impact right away, but I’m all for taking a big swing like Ojabo or Metchie.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.