Originally Posted by Mahomesmyman (Post 14441353)

She is definitely looking for way more than 75k. Its there to make the case federal not local.

Just found out her supposed gym is fake and never existed.

Becoming stranger and stranger.

Originally Posted by arrwheader (Post 14441338)

I agree with you EXCEPT shes only seeking 75k..........

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 14441369)

AB now being investigated for child endangerment.

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 14441362)

Those texts alone make the NFL look bad. People were going nuts over a blackmail tape and wanted Reek gone FOREVER for calling her a bitch, which was the truth.

75 k split between her layer. Yeah, it is not about the money. According to his texts, AB did what she is claiming and thinks he is above the law. He even insults her mom. I would bet money is the least of her motives.

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 14441366)

Would you take a load on your back and a little rape for over a million?


Set you up for life.....just gotta take a little forced lovin'.

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14441384)

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">To clarify: Allegheny County DA is not investigating sexual assault allegations against Antonio Brown. DA was contacted by Northern Regional Police Department concerning a possible child endangerment situation involving Brown, but did not move forward with investigating the claim</p>&mdash; Kevin Duffy (@KevinRDuffy) <a href="https://twitter.com/KevinRDuffy/status/1171851972904923136?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 11, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Originally Posted by kysirsoze (Post 14440872)

So you made a dumb comment without actually reading the story and that's.... my fault? And you're STILL dying on the McCoy hill?? LMAO

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 14441388)

No way BB wants this much heat LMAO

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 14441394)

Wow. That's not about him throwing his shit over the balcony either. What the **** else has this dude been up to.

Originally Posted by arrwheader (Post 14441390)

said they aren't going forward with investigation tho.....


but the fact shit keeps coming out wheew.

Originally Posted by R8RFAN (Post 14441350)

Raiders get rid of their problem players, Chiefs give the new contracts for breaking kids arms

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 14441320)

Did he say she wasn't?

Originally Posted by Mahomesmyman (Post 14441396)

Did you see these yet?

twitter.com/heybucknasty/status/1171810849801101313

Videos of her in ABs lap, in bed etc.

Originally Posted by Mahomesmyman (Post 14441396)

Did you see these yet?

twitter.com/heybucknasty/status/1171810849801101313

Videos of her in ABs lap, in bed etc.

Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 14441405)

Nice try getting me to download a virus!

Not sure if there's a virus, but I'm not clocking on the link to find out. I'll let DaFace click on the link first.

Originally Posted by Mahomesmyman (Post 14441396)

Did you see these yet?

twitter.com/heybucknasty/status/1171810849801101313

Videos of her in ABs lap, in bed etc.

Originally Posted by JimNasium (Post 14441164)

Is Antonio Brown a dolphin?

Originally Posted by InChiefsHell (Post 14441418)

These will not help her cause...

Originally Posted by InChiefsHell (Post 14441418)

These will not help her cause...

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 14441432)

Meh.

It was never any secret that they were in a relationship.

Originally Posted by Mahomesmyman (Post 14441434)

According to the law suit AB was trying to flirt/hit/**** her but she wanted to keep things friendly because she was with another man.

Then there's a video of her half naked in ABs bed.

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 14441437)

You can have consensual sex with a person and then get raped by them at a different time.

Originally Posted by kysirsoze (Post 14441438)

Bottom half? Because she's wearing a tank top and you can't see below the waist. Did you see the all-22 or something?

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 14441442)

The woman in those videos is Black, no?

Originally Posted by arrwheader (Post 14441443)

I am assuming this is why its in a civil court not criminal because no prosecutor would pick this case up. You can be around someone/be in videos/ even be half naked with someone in their bed and still not consent to anything, it's just very difficult if not impossible to prove that in criminal court.

Originally Posted by arrwheader (Post 14441443)

I am assuming this is why its in a civil court not criminal because no prosecutor would pick this case up. You can be around someone/be in videos/ even be half naked with someone in their bed and still not consent to anything, it's just very difficult if not impossible to prove that in criminal court.

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 14441445)

yeah i didn't grasp the point of that either.

Originally Posted by kysirsoze (Post 14441447)

LMAO What are you guys looking at?!

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 14441450)

but Britney is white, right? I am not understanding the video i saw, I guess. (Maybe it's because I can't do audio right now?)

Originally Posted by Mahomesmyman (Post 14441448)

I guess the point is that they said in the suit that there was only professional relationship nothing intimate and then there's a video of her sitting half naked in ABs bed which would suggest that there indeed was an intimate relationship.

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 14441450)

but Britney is white, right? I am not understanding the video i saw, I guess. (Maybe it's because I can't do audio right now?)

Originally Posted by arrwheader (Post 14441338)

I agree with you EXCEPT shes only seeking 75k..........

She also chose to not redact her name and go public....

Doesn't it seem to reason that she would seek more if it were really about money? She could have went after him to 7x that and kept her name out of the news. To me it seems like a person who wants some type of justice.

I have known a victim of such a crime, one in which the accused had friends in high places and I can tell you that there could have been a lot of intimidation going on from his lawyers/friends/ etc. it is a possibility that she tried to go to the police and the DA declined to prosecute. It could be that she got legal advice and they told her she wouldn't likely win in criminal court.

If this were the case, one would think there would be a police report somewhere. However, there is different confidentiality rules and I am not aware of all of them. It's possible she went to the police station and no charges were filed. This is all just speculation of course we don't know. It could also be entirely possible she made it all up. At this point we need the evidence to show up to make a call on it.

I do think he should be put on the Commish Exempt list based on his recent actions and now this. Looking at the history of players put on it though i doubt it. No if a criminal charge comes out.... yea he's toast.

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 14441450)

but Britney is white, right? I am not understanding the video i saw, I guess. (Maybe it's because I can't do audio right now?)

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 14441458)

Oh no.

We don't have someone else who thinks the Gruden pictures look suspiciously like Gruden, do we?

Parody is well and truly dead...

Originally Posted by JohnnyHammersticks (Post 14441456)

Anyone else using Firefox and not seeing any embedded tweets?

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 14441457)

FYI, Mr. Internet Attorney ...

75k is the minimum you must demand in order for a case to be filed in Federal court. That is not the final demand and usually isn't.

An example is the case of the Nigerians vs. Jessie Smollett et al. in which they wanted to file in Federal court (due to the interstate aspect of the case ... which is the same situation here). They filed for 75k (the minimum). Once filed, the damages can be requested in court and awarded by the jury (or not ... as the case may be).


The 75k is meaningless in real terms.

FAX

Originally Posted by Tonka83 (Post 14441461)

Same thing on Chrome. Only started happening today.

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 14441372)

link?

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 14441457)

FYI, Mr. Internet Attorney ...

75k is the minimum you must demand in order for a case to be filed in Federal court. That is not the final demand and usually isn't.

An example is the case of the Nigerians vs. Jessie Smollett et al. in which they wanted to file in Federal court (due to the interstate aspect of the case ... which is the same situation here). They filed for 75k (the minimum). Once filed, the damages can be requested in court and awarded by the jury (or not ... as the case may be).


The 75k is meaningless in real terms.

FAX

Originally Posted by arrwheader (Post 14441473)

yep corrected myself in a few other post my bad.

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 14441488)

Had I taken the time to actually read through the entire thread, I would have left this alone, Mr. arrwheader. I even thought about deleting my post after reading further through the thread, but I didn't see any major grammatical errors, so I just ... couldn't ... do ... it.

Anyway, it's a confusing rule the Feds have. I suppose they do it in order to allow cases to proceed while reducing the number of frivolous lawsuits for a buck here and a ten-spot there. One would think the baseline would be higher, but attorneys make those rules and you know what attorneys are like. Any case is better than no case to those guys.

FAX

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 14441458)

Oh no.

We don't have someone else who thinks the Gruden pictures look suspiciously like Gruden, do we?

Parody is well and truly dead...

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 14441488)

Had I taken the time to actually read through the entire thread, I would have left this alone, Mr. arrwheader. I even thought about deleting my post after reading further through the thread, but I didn't see any major grammatical errors, so I just ... couldn't ... do ... it.

Anyway, it's a confusing rule the Feds have. I suppose they do it in order to allow cases to proceed while reducing the number of frivolous lawsuits for a buck here and a ten-spot there. One would think the baseline would be higher, but attorneys make those rules and you know what attorneys are like. Any case is better than no case to those guys.

FAX

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 14441511)

FTR, so you don't get conspiracyminded, the federal jurisdictional requirements are set by statute. This isn't a gentleman's agreement, or an informal rule ginned up by the judges, or the bar. It's United States Code, ie, voted on by Congress.

Wouldn't be surprised if the $75K number isn't revisited and revised sometime relatively soon, as it's not nearly the money it was when enacted.

But yeah, the purpose is to keep small local matters out of federal court.
The entirety of the jursidictional requirement isn't just the dollar amount though. You also have to involve entities of different states [if they're both from the same state, it's entirely state business], and the matter has to be filed in a federal court that has a connection to the issue at hand [ie, can't file a federal suit in a federal court in California for a car accident that happened in Maine, etc.].

So like, take Tracy Morgan's accident. NY resident, extensively injured in NJ by a GA truck driver working for an INTL corp HQed in AR. Claim filed in US Dist Ct, Dist of NJ.

Originally Posted by RollChiefsRoll (Post 14441525)

This guy paid attention in 1L civ pro.

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 14441511)

FTR, so you don't get conspiracyminded, the federal jurisdictional requirements are set by statute. This isn't a gentleman's agreement, or an informal rule ginned up by the judges, or the bar. It's United States Code, ie, voted on by Congress.

Wouldn't be surprised if the $75K number isn't revisited and revised sometime relatively soon, as it's not nearly the money it was when enacted.

But yeah, the purpose is to keep small local matters out of federal court.
The entirety of the jursidictional requirement isn't just the dollar amount though. You also have to involve entities of different states [if they're both from the same state, it's entirely state business], and the matter has to be filed in a federal court that has a connection to the issue at hand [ie, can't file a federal suit in a federal court in California for a car accident that happened in Maine, etc.].

So like, take Tracy Morgan's accident. NY resident, extensively injured in NJ by a GA truck driver working for an INTL corp HQed in AR. Claim filed in US Dist Ct, Dist of NJ.

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 14441547)

I was born conspiracy-minded and in the name of Chandra Dangi's Stepladder, I shall remain so, Mr. Baby Lee.

Besides, if I'm not mistaken, over 90% of Congress is comprised of attorneys. Therefore, lawyers do, in fact, set that 75k standard.

In the spirit of Amicus Curiae, put that in your jury box.

FAX

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 14441555)

I meant the royal you, not you specifically, Mr. Fax the Quick to Offense.

But I mean yeah, if the more I point out how checks and balances and separation of powers and consensus and all that factors into a decision, the bigger one makes the conspiracy, we're just stuck in an endless loop.

Originally Posted by JimNasium (Post 14441164)

Is Antonio Brown a dolphin?

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14441585)

It blows my mind how narratives work.

The narrative form day one was Tyreek was guilty. The narrative the second this news broke was that it was a cash grab simply because of timing and the fact that it’s a civil suit.

People make up their minds so ****ing quickly.

Originally Posted by Ubeja Vontell (Post 14441199)

The ...THREE TIMES....thing is where it all falls apart.

This needs to just be ignored by the NFL/Pats.

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 14441589)

Because Tyreek Hill plead guilty to punching and choking his pregnant gf.

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 14441573)

Originally Posted by BDj23 (Post 14441582)

They exempt list this piece of shit yet?