ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs This is how the NFL rigs games (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=341646)

HemiEd 01-04-2022 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 16051541)
The Chiefs were favored by 5.5 points over the Bengals right? Once the Chiefs got ahead by 14 in the first half and were just easily carving them up, I knew the flags were gonna start flying. And right on cue, they came. Big return? Nah, holding. Big run on 3rd and 2? Nah, holding. Big stop on 3rd down? Nah, pass interference. False start on the Bengals on a big play late in the game? Nah, encroachment on the defense.

The 18 penalties they got on their final "game winning drive" was just the icing on the cake. This cake:

http://s3.media.squarespace.com/prod...Bto%252Bus.jpg

Yep, but then you have those that want us to believe as they want to believe, it is just incompetence. They remind me of a kid screaming when they find out there is no easter bunny or Santa Claus.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/igcw0--GcVg" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2022 11:08 AM

I'm sure the news of Orlando Brown's calf injury 30 minutes before the game has zero impact on the lines...

Dartgod 01-04-2022 11:08 AM

Ok, I can't post the link right now because I am on my work computer, but I think Rabblerouser is way off on this line changing stuff. I'd love to see proof if I am wrong. This is all via Oddshark.com. You can go there if you want more detail. I left out dates where the line did not change.

Bovada
Opening line 12/26: Chiefs -4.5
12/28: Chiefs -5
12/30: Chiefs -5
12/31: Chiefs -4.5
1/1: Chiefs -4
1/2: Chiefs -4

BetNow
Opening line 12/26: Chiefs -4.5
12/26: Chiefs -5
12/27: Chiefs -5.5
12/28: Chiefs -5
12/31: Chiefs -4.5
12/31: Chiefs -4
1/1: Chiefs -3.5
1/2: Chiefs -3.5

BetOnline
Opening line 12/26: Chiefs -4.5
12/27: Chiefs -5
12/28: Chiefs -5.5
12/30: Chiefs -5
12/31: Chiefs -4.5
1/1: Chiefs -3.5
1/2: Chiefs -3.5

Clearly, there were no significant jumps in the line, especially on the day of the game. I'd love to know where Rabble is getting his info.

/condescendingprickdisabled

TwistedChief 01-04-2022 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16051810)
I'd like to first establish that the line changed within hours of the announcement of the replacement crew. That should be the baseline for this discussion.

https://www.newspressnow.com/sports/...0f47f2f92.html

Okay. This provides some context.

The NFL tests refs for covid on Monday. On Tuesday, it was announced that this Torbert guy would not be officiating the game, but on Sunday, out of the blue, he ended up working it anyway. I would think it's fairly likely he tested positive for covid but then was asymptomatic during the week and also got a negative test so was able to work it.

I would imagine the other substitutions are covid-related as well.

So, at a minimum, if you can provide evidence that the line moved from Monday to Tuesday to Wednesday, that would at least provide some evidence that perhaps someone somewhere believed this to be some nefarious rigging activity and bet on Cincy as a result.

But then the guy who was subbed out worked the game anyway!? Maybe he had a change of heart and became more rig-friendly during the week?

Fish 01-04-2022 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 16051701)
Thank you.

Logic.



[...]

LMAO... no, you are absolutely not using logic here. This conspiracy nonsense is quite the opposite of that.

Dartgod 01-04-2022 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16051829)
https://www.newspressnow.com/sports/...0f47f2f92.html

Okay. This provides some context.

The NFL tests refs for covid on Monday. On Tuesday, it was announced that this Torbert guy would not be officiating the game, but on Sunday, out of the blue, he ended up working it anyway. I would think it's fairly likely he tested positive for covid but then was asymptomatic during the week and also got a negative test so was able to work it.

I would imagine the other substitutions are covid-related as well.

So, at a minimum, if you can provide evidence that the line moved from Monday to Tuesday to Wednesday, that would at least provide some evidence that perhaps someone somewhere believed this to be some nefarious rigging activity and bet on Cincy as a result.

But then the guy who was subbed out worked the game anyway!? Maybe he had a change of heart and became more rig-friendly during the week?

In all of my examples the line went up Tuesday and Wednesday and then started coming back down later in the week.

rabblerouser 01-04-2022 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 16051812)
I'm not even arguing against you, I'm just trying to figure out how deep this goes in your opinion, since you're clearly ignoring that part of the conversation.

I take it you don't agree with BlackOp's perspective then, and that games aren't performed and the NFL doesn't have control over entire weeks of the season when there are a lot of upsets?

You're saying this is just between the NFL front offices and the refs?

You've said "everyone knows", so of course that includes coaches and players knowing and being okay with it.... even someone like Kaepernick, who completely got screwed by the NFL, hasn't (to my knowledge) come out and put it out in the open.

So once again... your opinion is this is strictly an NFL front office and refs thing, where the NFL steers games based on specific instructions to ref crews (whether it's as real time as "the Chiefs can't score before halftime or slightly less direct like "this game needs to stay close"). No player or coach involvement.

Absolutely I agree with BlackOp's perspective. A lot of us do. And I'm not ignoring anything.

I don't know how deep it goes.

Quote:

In this year’s installment of the*America’s Game*series by NFL Films, former Ravens linebacker Ray Lewis said that he doesn’t buy that the power went out accidentally in a game that the Ravens were winning handily before darkness fell.

“I’m not gonna*accuse nobody of nothing*— because I don’t know facts. But you’re a zillion-dollar company, and your lights go out? No. No way,” Lewis said, via Nate Davis of*USA Today.*“Now listen, if you grew up like I grew up — and you grew up in a household like I grew up — then sometimes your lights might go out, because times get hard. I understand that. But you cannot tell me somebody wasn’t sitting there and when they say, ‘The Ravens [are] about to blow them out. Man, we better do something.’ … That’s a huge shift in any game, in all seriousness. And as you see how huge it was because it let them right back in the game.”

https://www.google.com/amp/s/profoot...-accident/amp/

Quote:

In an interview with the ESPN’s Lisa Salters, fellow Ravens linebacker*Terrell Suggs echoed his teammates’ comments, and openly suggested that Goodell may have ordered the blackout for gambling-related reasons. “I was like Vegas, parlor tricks, you know what I mean?” Suggs told the newspaper. “I was like ahh, Roger Goodell, he never stops, he always has something up his sleeve. He just couldn’t let us have this one in a landside huh?”
https://www.ibtimes.com/super-bowl-f...-proof-1549788

Quote:

One of the heroes of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers’ dominant Super Bowl win back in 2003 has a strong opinion about who decides the winner of the Lombardi Trophy every year.

Appearing on Tampa’s WDAE on Wednesday, former Bucs defensive back Dwight Smith told listeners that “Vegas decides who will win the Super Bowl,” based on which team will make them the most money. "Games aren't decided on the field."

Smith had a pair of pick-sixes in Tampa Bay’s 48-21 win over the Oakland Raiders in Super Bowl XXXVII.

https://bucswire.usatoday.com/2021/0...-dwight-smith/

Quote:

When the Jets, 18 1/2-point underdogs, beat the Baltimore Colts, 16-7, in 1969 in the third Super Bowl, it was considered the biggest upset in the history of professional football. Now, more than 14 years later, Bubba Smith, a former Baltimore defensive lineman, is suggesting that the game may have been fixed to give the American Football League credibility in its merger with the National Football League.

Smith, who voiced his suspicions in a new autobiography, ''Kill, Bubba, Kill,'' and in an interview in the November issue of Playboy magazine, repeated them last night in a television interview with Marv Albert. He said he was told by ''a bookmaker in New York and members of the N.F.L. Players Association,'' none of whom were named, that the game had been fixed. He initially rejected the idea, he said, but changed his mind after reflecting on the game. ''I knew something was wrong, you know, through the whole day, because if you look back at the films, we were inside the 20 five times in the first half and came away with no points.''*

https://www.nytimes.com/1983/09/29/s...ix-hinted.html

Super Bowl III is interesting, because of the whole merger. And Don Shula (with Earl Morrall) going to the hapless Dolphins, who within 2 years had the NFL's only perfect season. In paradise.

And then Super Bowl IV...

Donald Dawson ...the cash...Len Dawson getting arrested and basically telling the FBI that it had nothing to do with Vegas and everything to do with establishing the legitimacy of the NFL...

The Kansas City Shuffle.

How deep DOES it go??

Dartgod 01-04-2022 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 16051842)
Absolutely I agree with BlackOp's perspective. A lot of us do. And I'm not ignoring anything.

I don't know how deep it goes.



https://www.google.com/amp/s/profoot...-accident/amp/



https://www.ibtimes.com/super-bowl-f...-proof-1549788



https://bucswire.usatoday.com/2021/0...-dwight-smith/



https://www.nytimes.com/1983/09/29/s...ix-hinted.html

Super Bowl III is interesting, because of the whole merger. And Don Shula (with Earl Morrall) going to the hapless Dolphins, who within 2 years had the NFL's only perfect season. In paradise.

And then Super Bowl IV...

Donald Dawson ...the cash...Len Dawson getting arrested and basically telling the FBI that it had nothing to do with Vegas and everything to do with establishing the legitimacy of the NFL...

The Kansas City Shuffle.

How deep DOES it go??

All you are doing is providing examples of players and others who think like you do. None of this is proof.

What about your assertion that the line moved right before the game when the replacement ref crew was announced? Can you refute the stuff I posted?

rabblerouser 01-04-2022 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 16051839)
LMAO... no, you are absolutely not using logic here. This conspiracy nonsense is quite the opposite of that.

The only thing that doesn't pass the logic test is "boy them refs sure are bad at their jobs, herp-a-derp! They need to be gettin' them there eyes checked! Need new glasses ref?? DERP!"

rabblerouser 01-04-2022 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 16051839)
LMAO... no, you are absolutely not using logic here. This conspiracy nonsense is quite the opposite of that.

The only thing that doesn't pass the logic test is "boy them refs sure are bad at their jobs, herp-a-derp! They need to be gettin' them there eyes checked! Need new glasses ref?? DERP!"

And, for the record, I was responding to someone else's comment.

I said that they were being logical. I agreed with that person's statement.

Dartgod 01-04-2022 11:35 AM

Someone please quote my posts in case Rabble put me on ignore...again.

I'd love to hear his side on this and have him prove me wrong, if possible.

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2022 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod (Post 16051849)
All you are doing is providing examples of players and others who think like you do. None of this is proof.

What about your assertion that the line moved right before the game when the replacement ref crew was announced? Can you refute the stuff I posted?


https://c.tenor.com/sElmhbybTFAAAAAC...urt-thingy.gif

rabblerouser 01-04-2022 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod (Post 16051849)
All you are doing is providing examples of players and others who think like you do. None of this is proof.

What about your assertion that the line moved right before the game when the replacement ref crew was announced? Can you refute the stuff I posted?

No, I can't refute anything about the line. It is what is. They move all the time.

And those are Super Bowl champions who also think like I do. Correct. People who have played the game at the highest of levels.

crispystl 01-04-2022 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 16051812)
I'm not even arguing against you, I'm just trying to figure out how deep this goes in your opinion, since you're clearly ignoring that part of the conversation.

I take it you don't agree with BlackOp's perspective then, and that games aren't performed and the NFL doesn't have control over entire weeks of the season when there are a lot of upsets?

You're saying this is just between the NFL front offices and the refs?

You've said "everyone knows", so of course that includes coaches and players knowing and being okay with it.... even someone like Kaepernick, who completely got screwed by the NFL, hasn't (to my knowledge) come out and put it out in the open.

So once again... your opinion is this is strictly an NFL front office and refs thing, where the NFL steers games based on specific instructions to ref crews (whether it's as real time as "the Chiefs can't score before halftime or slightly less direct like "this game needs to stay close"). No player or coach involvement.

I'll say this....in Tim Donaghy's book he specifically states the league told them to steer games certain ways. i.e. extend playoff series etc.
Now, I know I'm referring to an NBA ref from 15 years ago, but if that shit goes on in the NBA I don't see how it doesn't in the NFL.

I think it's more of an attempt to keep games close or steer them for better matchups/more revenue. I don't think they have a huge conspiracy from one year to the next where they say " Ok this is the Bengals year boys!" People like Brady definitely get preferential calls too.

straycash 01-04-2022 11:38 AM

I'd say the fact of the NFL being entertainment and not a sport is pretty good proof

Red Dawg 01-04-2022 11:39 AM

I certainly don't think every game is rigged but football is a business and it's worth so many billions that it isn't left totally up to chance in my opinion. No business this valuable would be.

Before Goodell I think it was pretty clean but since he took over I don't think it is. Kraft got him the job and it just so happens he gets 3 rings immediately and Brady is constantly getting big calls at the right time even after the mass video tape stuff that the league totally covered up. That scandal was massively big and they destroyed the evidence. Brady games have hosed us hard with officiating to say the least.

Al Davis sues the other owners the same year as the tuck rule game. It was an obvious fumble to everyone in America. Coincidence?

Katrina hit and the Saints win the SB. Is that not odd?

LA gets the Rams and then the famous no call PI gets them to the SB. Coincidence?

Manning goes to Denver and in his worse season ever gets another ring, then walks away.

These are just a few situations that don't compute but there are more shady games. The Bengals game is just like insane. Give me a break with all those game changing flags. One after another and 3 were totally bogus.

mkp785 01-04-2022 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 16051789)
Yup.

No one wants to pay attention to that.

Bearcat and Dartgod would rather be pricks than to address it.

Are you STILL crying about this? It's been like 2 days, you're like a distraught woman that's upset. We lost, due to crappy calls but OUR DEFENSE gave up 300 yards to a WR.

That's why we lost. ****, quit being a bitch. Stop watching and maybe you and blackops can go off together and make sense of all of this. Bring that 1 guy who thinks the Earth is only 600 years old and figure it all out.

TwistedChief 01-04-2022 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod (Post 16051827)
Ok, I can't post the link right now because I am on my work computer, but I think Rabblerouser is way off on this line changing stuff. I'd love to see proof if I am wrong. This is all via Oddshark.com. You can go there if you want more detail. I left out dates where the line did not change.

Bovada
Opening line 12/26: Chiefs -4.5
12/28: Chiefs -5
12/30: Chiefs -5
12/31: Chiefs -4.5
1/1: Chiefs -4
1/2: Chiefs -4

BetNow
Opening line 12/26: Chiefs -4.5
12/26: Chiefs -5
12/27: Chiefs -5.5
12/28: Chiefs -5
12/31: Chiefs -4.5
12/31: Chiefs -4
1/1: Chiefs -3.5
1/2: Chiefs -3.5

BetOnline
Opening line 12/26: Chiefs -4.5
12/27: Chiefs -5
12/28: Chiefs -5.5
12/30: Chiefs -5
12/31: Chiefs -4.5
1/1: Chiefs -3.5
1/2: Chiefs -3.5

Clearly, there were no significant jumps in the line, especially on the day of the game. I'd love to know where Rabble is getting his info.

/condescendingprickdisabled

rabble - Please post your evidence that the line moved as a result of announcement on Tuesday. And also, did you notice it move back once it was announced that the originally-replaced ref was actually going to be working?

This will help us further the debate more than your posting the same links (for the hundredth time) about a handful of random ex-players alledging something with zero proof.

rabblerouser 01-04-2022 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by straycash (Post 16051864)
I'd say the fact of the NFL being entertainment and not a sport is pretty good proof

The whole "having the same antitrust laws as the WWE" is pretty damning, too.

There's just so much evidence that points to the league's manipulation during games and absolutely no evidence to refute it.

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck...why would someone assume it's anything BUT a duck?

rabblerouser 01-04-2022 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16051867)
rabble - Please post your evidence that the line moved as a result of announcement on Tuesday. And also, did you notice it move back once it was announced that the originally-replaced ref was actually going to be working?

This will help us further the debate more than your posting the same links (for the hundredth time) about a handful of random ex-players alledging something with zero proof.

I have none. We've established that lines move.

Whatever. I don't need to make anyone believe what others see as blatantly obvious.

That was a horseshit travesty on Sunday. You can believe that the officials were that terrible if you want. If league officials and players' accounts aren't enough for you, it's okay.

TwistedChief 01-04-2022 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 16051858)
No, I can't refute anything about the line. It is what is. They move all the time.

And those are Super Bowl champions who also think like I do. Correct. People who have played the game at the highest of levels.

Wait. You kept throwing this 'STOP AVOIDING THE DISCUSSION OF WHY THE LINE MOVED' card and then you fold like a Bills mafia brokedick table?

And then cited people who were SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS as backing up your outrageous, evidence-less claims?

You're a smart guy, dude. But this is not your best moment. I've wasted enough time playing these games of make-believe with you. Enjoy fantasyland, Peter Pan.

Mr. Plow 01-04-2022 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 16051812)
I'm not even arguing against you, I'm just trying to figure out how deep this goes in your opinion, since you're clearly ignoring that part of the conversation.

I take it you don't agree with BlackOp's perspective then, and that games aren't performed and the NFL doesn't have control over entire weeks of the season when there are a lot of upsets?

You're saying this is just between the NFL front offices and the refs?

You've said "everyone knows", so of course that includes coaches and players knowing and being okay with it.... even someone like Kaepernick, who completely got screwed by the NFL, hasn't (to my knowledge) come out and put it out in the open.

So once again... your opinion is this is strictly an NFL front office and refs thing, where the NFL steers games based on specific instructions to ref crews (whether it's as real time as "the Chiefs can't score before halftime or slightly less direct like "this game needs to stay close"). No player or coach involvement.

JUST WATCH THE GAME

Pepe Silvia 01-04-2022 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Dawg (Post 16051865)
I certainly don't think every game is rigged but football is a business and it's worth so many billions that it isn't left totally up to chance in my opinion. No business this valuable would be.

Before Goodell I think it was pretty clean but since he took over I don't think it is. Kraft got him the job and it just so happens he gets 3 rings immediately and Brady is constantly getting big calls at the right time even after the mass video tape stuff that the league totally covered up. That scandal was massively big and they destroyed the evidence. Brady games have hosed us hard with officiating to say the least.

Al Davis sues the other owners the same year as the tuck rule game. It was an obvious fumble to everyone in America. Coincidence?

Katrina hit and the Saints win the SB. Is that not odd?

LA gets the Rams and then the famous no call PI gets them to the SB. Coincidence?

Manning goes to Denver and in his worse season ever gets another ring, then walks away.

These are just a few situations that don't compute but there are more shady games. The Bengals game is just like insane. Give me a break with all those game changing flags. One after another and 3 were totally bogus.

Don’t forget Jerome Bettis winning a SB in his hometown and the Harbaugh brothers facing off in the big one.

rabblerouser 01-04-2022 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Dawg (Post 16051865)
I certainly don't think every game is rigged but football is a business and it's worth so many billions that it isn't left totally up to chance in my opinion. No business this valuable would be.

Before Goodell I think it was pretty clean but since he took over I don't think it is. Kraft got him the job and it just so happens he gets 3 rings immediately and Brady is constantly getting big calls at the right time even after the mass video tape stuff that the league totally covered up. That scandal was massively big and they destroyed the evidence. Brady games have hosed us hard with officiating to say the least.

Al Davis sues the other owners the same year as the tuck rule game. It was an obvious fumble to everyone in America. Coincidence?

Katrina hit and the Saints win the SB. Is that not odd?

LA gets the Rams and then the famous no call PI gets them to the SB. Coincidence?

Manning goes to Denver and in his worse season ever gets another ring, then walks away.

These are just a few situations that don't compute but there are more shady games. The Bengals game is just like insane. Give me a break with all those game changing flags. One after another and 3 were totally bogus.

Correct.

Fish 01-04-2022 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 16051851)
The only thing that doesn't pass the logic test is "boy them refs sure are bad at their jobs, herp-a-derp! They need to be gettin' them there eyes checked! Need new glasses ref?? DERP!"

Ironically that would be an example of actual logic. In this case, Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is the most likely.

Like I said, you don't understand logic.

rabblerouser 01-04-2022 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16051875)
Wait. You kept throwing this 'STOP AVOIDING THE DISCUSSION OF WHY THE LINE MOVED' card and then you fold like a Bills mafia brokedick table?

And then cited people who were SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS as backing up your outrageous, evidence-less claims?

You're a smart guy, dude. But this is not your best moment. I've wasted enough time playing these games of make-believe with you. Enjoy fantasyland, Peter Pan.

I folded because I'm just not knowledgeable enough about gaming and odds making to get that deep into it.

I'm smart enough to know that isn't my bread and butter here and will simply convolute the point.

And also, people with more knowledge than me about gambling have addressed the line, and I moved on accordingly

rabblerouser 01-04-2022 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 16051886)
Ironically that would be an example of actual logic. In this case, Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is the most likely.

Like I said, you don't understand logic.

It's only simple if it makes sense.

If those refs were THAT terrible...how come all the shit calls went to the Bengals' benefit?

straycash 01-04-2022 11:54 AM

https://youtu.be/V0EZobdiJ4M

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2022 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 16051886)
Ironically that would be an example of actual logic. In this case, Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is the most likely.

Like I said, you don't understand logic.

Athletic officiating has been poor for my entire lifetime. This isn't a new phenomenon.

And it will continue to be, because humans are falliable. Players make numerous mistakes in the course of play, but we expect officials to be perfect.

Calls are missed in every game, in every sport, every day.

But it's easier to claim the fix is in rather than accept that shit happens and your team lost.

rabblerouser 01-04-2022 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16051898)
Athletic officiating has been poor for my entire lifetime. This isn't a new phenomenon.

And it will continue to be, because humans are falliable. Players make numerous mistakes in the course of play, but we expect officials to be perfect.

Calls are missed in every game, in every sport, every day.

But it's easier to claim the fix is in rather than accept that shit happens and your team lost.

Again if they were THAT terrible...really just pert near incompetent...how come all the shit calls went against the Chiefs?? Wouldn't they just...suck? And not just suck for one team's benefit??

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2022 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 16051905)
Again if they were THAT terrible...really just pert near incompetent...how come all the shit calls went against the Chiefs?? Wouldn't they just...suck? And not just suck for one team's benefit??

It's almost like you've never watched sports before.

Again, happens in every sport.

Why does Team A get 6 Power Plays in a hockey game while Team B gets 1?

Why does Team A go to the free throw line 26 times in a basketball game while Team B only goes 10?

Why are the Raiders the most penalized team in football year after year?

Because sometimes, teams are just undisciplined and take stupid/bad penalties.

Hell, the officials could have called MORE penalties on KC than they did Sunday, I recall several instances where I told my wife we got away with no calls - DB's holding jerseys and Wylie (I think) absolutely tackling a pass rusher.

As much as you don't like it, several of the calls that went against us were the right call - but add the few that were poor calls at inopportune times to the others and you have people like yourself that chalk it up to RIGGED.

mkp785 01-04-2022 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 16051905)
Again if they were THAT terrible...really just pert near incompetent...how come all the shit calls went against the Chiefs?? Wouldn't they just...suck? And not just suck for one team's benefit??

You're a moron. Calls go both ways all the time. This is you whining like a little bitch. You want to blame someone for this loss? Start with Spags and Fat Andy.

Simply Red 01-04-2022 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spott (Post 16048188)
The NFL absolutely has and always will rig games.

I wish like hell I could find the Dick Butkus story. Yes it is.

Molitoth 01-04-2022 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brother (Post 16051550)
Games are steered. Not rigged but absolutely steered a certain way.

Steered is a much better word than rigged.

Like someone mentioned before... in many games, (especially hyped matchups/primtime) the refs provide the rubber band handicap (like racing video games) once a blowout is in order.

Watch any game this weekend that starts to get out of hand. Refs will start tossing flags to make the game closer.

They want close games and drama, they do not want complete blowouts because it deters viewers.... and what is the big money maker in the NFL???? TV contracts.

The Chiefs got some calls in 2019 because it was the greatest story in the NFL. EXACTLY 50 years since the last super bowl... NEW Exciting QB changing the game with no look passes, etc...

rabblerouser 01-04-2022 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 16051936)
I wish like hell I could find the Dick Butkus story. Yes it is.

I know. It's like it's gone. It's been removed from the internet.

rabblerouser 01-04-2022 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkp785 (Post 16051931)
You're a moron. Calls go both ways all the time. This is you whining like a little bitch. You want to blame someone for this loss? Start with Spags and Fat Andy.

If they "go both ways all the time", why was last Sunday such an exception?

It's okay, I'll wait here while you call me names and figure it out.

Bearcat 01-04-2022 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16051925)
It's almost like you've never watched sports before.

Again, happens in every sport.

Why does Team A get 6 Power Plays in a hockey game while Team B gets 1?

Why does Team A go to the free throw line 26 times in a basketball game while Team B only goes 10?

Hell, the officials could have called MORE penalties on KC than they did Sunday, I recall several instances where I told my wife we got away with no calls - DB's holding jerseys and Wylie (I think) absolutely tackling a pass rusher.

As much as you don't like it, several of the calls that went against us were the right call - but add the few that were poor calls at inopportune times to the others and you have people like yourself that chalk it up to RIGGED.

Yeah, I saw someone point out 4 calls in the game, but two were pretty obvious. One DPI was horrible, but the whole uncatchable thing is missed a decent amount. And I didn't see the dual holdings, and saw someone say the illegal hands to the face was hard enough that the receiver had to adjust his helmet mid-route. There was also a missed offsides and the encroachment call.

It's a convenient slope that "holding like that happens every play" or other vague rationalizations when it comes to letting them play.

The 3rd down DPI was the worst of it, IMO, in terms of calling a penalty when there clearly wasn't one, minus not seeing the replays of the dual holding calls.

After that, it's just biased reaching to fulfill a theory.

And like I've said in this thread already, I really don't know WTF to believe in terms of if and how games are influenced and to what extent. To believe BlackOps is to believe a pretty widespread conspiracy that most likely involves players, if entire weeks of the season are suddenly rigged with upsets.

End of the day though, we can guess and debate how deep it goes or if at all, but the NFL certainly doesn't help with the total lack of accountability... and it doesn't even matter to me why games are completely ruined, just that they have been.

mkp785 01-04-2022 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 16051950)
If they "go both ways all the time", why was last Sunday such an example?

It's okay, I'll wait here while you call me names and figure it out.

Sigh.....

Do you remember our game last year when we stomped Buffalo in the AFC championship game?

Do you remember that a lot of people thought our CBs got too grabby and handsy? Hell, the announcers were saying it I rememeber. I'll bet that over at whatever the Bills version of CP is, those fans were saying that the league wanted us to win and let Badger and everyone else grab and hold as much as they wanted.

Meanwhile back over here, we were all celebrating. No thoughts of defense holding and pass interfering.

Point is, like I just said call go both ways. We got away with shit in AFC title game, Sunday, we didn't. Refs called it shitty...I'm not disagreeing with you about that. Happens every week.

You're asking me about why last week happened? Because the refs had shitty calls. No more, no less.

Bigger question is why didn't Spags double Chase? Why didn't we use the 2 high shell defense that teams having been using on us all year long so that we make Cincy go the distance the long way and take away the deep ball. Why didn't Andy let them score at the end so Mahomes could get the ball back?

^^^^These are much better questions as to refs wanting the biggest star in the league to lose^^^^

Fish 01-04-2022 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 16051946)
Steered is a much better word than rigged.

Like someone mentioned before... in many games, (especially hyped matchups/primtime) the refs provide the rubber band handicap (like racing video games) once a blowout is in order.

Watch any game this weekend that starts to get out of hand. Refs will start tossing flags to make the game closer.

They want close games and drama, they do not want complete blowouts because it deters viewers.... and what is the big money maker in the NFL???? TV contracts.

The Chiefs got some calls in 2019 because it was the greatest story in the NFL. EXACTLY 50 years since the last super bowl... NEW Exciting QB changing the game with no look passes, etc...

How do you explain the televised week 16 games? Chiefs routed the Steelers for the entire game. Didn't seem to be any ref action to even that. How about the game that followed, where the Cowboys put up 56 points on WSH? The Monday night game where the Saints couldn't score more than a FG? Just ignore those examples?

Regardless, TV contracts are not dependent on viewership of individual games. That's not how it works.

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2022 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 16051974)
How do you explain the televised week 16 games? Chiefs routed the Steelers for the entire game. Didn't seem to be any ref action to even that. How about the game that followed, where the Cowboys put up 56 points on WSH? The Monday night game where the Saints couldn't score more than a FG? Just ignore those examples?

Regardless, TV contracts are not dependent on viewership of individual games. That's not how it works.

IIRC, 9 of this week's games had a winning margin of 10 points or more.

8 of those 9 had a winning margin of 17 points or more.

Bengal_Guy 01-04-2022 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 16051950)
If they "go both ways all the time", why was last Sunday such an exception?

It's okay, I'll wait here while you call me names and figure it out.

I registered just for this thread. The Bengals had two penalties called on them on the final drive. Same number as Chiefs. Both were killer. One took them out of relatively easy FG range and is often a drive killer...holding on 1st and 10 at 24 yard line to 1st and 20 at the 34...why call THAT flag if they wanted Bengals to win?

On goal line, the offsetting penalties cost Bengals a TD. IF no holding call on Bengals, Mixon would have been given a TD on review. Ball crossed before his elbow hit, you can look it up. So refs not only called a penalty on Bengals they also marked him down short. Neither seem indicative of refs nudging Bengals to win. Boyd had to adjust his helmet after the hands to the face...do you really think if the roles were reversed you wouldn't agree with that penalty if it was on Hill?

On Pringles TD...the flag was thrown well before it was obvious he would return for a TD and he was obviously held. The refs had no way to know at that moment of the penalty he would run it back.

I thought the unnecessary roughness call on Chase was BS and there was a ticky tack PI that was also, I thought, a bad call. Otherwise it was a pretty typical Bengals game as far as penalties go. We are one of the least penalized teams in the NFL.

You guys are passionate fans and hurt by the loss so I am not trying to stir sht up. Just trying to bring some opposite view points. Peace

Fish 01-04-2022 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bengal_Guy (Post 16052002)
I registered just for this thread. The Bengals had two penalties called on them on the final drive. Same number as Chiefs. Both were killer. One took them out of relatively easy FG range and is often a drive killer...holding on 1st and 10 at 24 yard line to 1st and 20 at the 34...why call THAT flag if they wanted Bengals to win?

On goal line, the offsetting penalties cost Bengals a TD. IF no holding call on Bengals, Mixon would have been given a TD on review. Ball crossed before his elbow hit, you can look it up. So refs not only called a penalty on Bengals they also marked him down short. Neither seem indicative of refs nudging Bengals to win. Boyd had to adjust his helmet after the hands to the face...do you really think if the roles were reversed you wouldn't agree with that penalty if it was on Hill?

On Pringles TD...the flag was thrown well before it was obvious he would return for a TD and he was obviously held. The refs had no way to know at that moment of the penalty he would run it back.

I thought the unnecessary roughness call on Chase was BS and there was a ticky tack PI that was also, I thought, a bad call. Otherwise it was a pretty typical Bengals game as far as penalties go. We are one of the least penalized teams in the NFL.

You guys are passionate fans and hurt by the loss so I am not trying to stir sht up. Just trying to being some opposite view points. Peace

Good first post. Don't mind the small handful of conspiracy knuckleheads. They do this after about every Chiefs loss that involves any kind of officiating mistakes. Not a word when it happens during a Chiefs win.

ThaVirus 01-04-2022 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkp785 (Post 16051931)
You're a moron. Calls go both ways all the time. This is you whining like a little bitch. You want to blame someone for this loss? Start with Spags and Fat Andy.

Cool avatar. Is that fireball supposed to be Earth?

Bengal_Guy 01-04-2022 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 16052009)
Good first post. Don't mind the small handful of conspiracy knuckleheads. They do this after about every Chiefs loss that involves any kind of officiating mistakes. Not a word when it happens during a Chiefs win.

Appreciate the welcome...I have enjoyed reading the board these last few days as the Chiefs and their success are what we aspire to become.

Dartgod 01-04-2022 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bengal_Guy (Post 16052002)
I registered just for this thread. The Bengals had two penalties called on them on the final drive. Same number as Chiefs. Both were killer. One took them out of relatively easy FG range and is often a drive killer...holding on 1st and 10 at 24 yard line to 1st and 20 at the 34...why call THAT flag if they wanted Bengals to win?

On goal line, the offsetting penalties cost Bengals a TD. IF no holding call on Bengals, Mixon would have been given a TD on review. Ball crossed before his elbow hit, you can look it up. So refs not only called a penalty on Bengals they also marked him down short. Neither seem indicative of refs nudging Bengals to win. Boyd had to adjust his helmet after the hands to the face...do you really think if the roles were reversed you wouldn't agree with that penalty if it was on Hill?

On Pringles TD...the flag was thrown well before it was obvious he would return for a TD and he was obviously held. The refs had no way to know at that moment of the penalty he would run it back.

I thought the unnecessary roughness call on Chase was BS and there was a ticky tack PI that was also, I thought, a bad call. Otherwise it was a pretty typical Bengals game as far as penalties go. We are one of the least penalized teams in the NFL.

You guys are passionate fans and hurt by the loss so I am not trying to stir sht up. Just trying to being some opposite view points. Peace

I don't buy into the rigged or conspiracy stuff, but the worst call was the PI on your final TD drive. You guys were punting with us still leading if that horrible call was not made.

Then there was the inexcusable defensive call we made on that 3rd and 27 play. Just brutal.

Fish 01-04-2022 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bengal_Guy (Post 16052020)
Appreciate the welcome...I have enjoyed reading the board these last few days as the Chiefs and their success are what we aspire to become.

You guys have a shitload of young talent. Lots of potential. Hopefully we'll see many more competitive games like that over the next few years.

mkp785 01-04-2022 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 16052019)
Cool avatar. Is that fireball supposed to be Earth?

Thanks. I would assume so but we never really see what the astronaut looks like...could be some weird alien looking at a different planet.

Bearcat 01-04-2022 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bengal_Guy (Post 16052002)
I registered just for this thread. The Bengals had two penalties called on them on the final drive. Same number as Chiefs. Both were killer. One took them out of relatively easy FG range and is often a drive killer...holding on 1st and 10 at 24 yard line to 1st and 20 at the 34...why call THAT flag if they wanted Bengals to win?

On goal line, the offsetting penalties cost Bengals a TD. IF no holding call on Bengals, Mixon would have been given a TD on review. Ball crossed before his elbow hit, you can look it up. So refs not only called a penalty on Bengals they also marked him down short. Neither seem indicative of refs nudging Bengals to win. Boyd had to adjust his helmet after the hands to the face...do you really think if the roles were reversed you wouldn't agree with that penalty if it was on Hill?

On Pringles TD...the flag was thrown well before it was obvious he would return for a TD and he was obviously held. The refs had no way to know at that moment of the penalty he would run it back.

I thought the unnecessary roughness call on Chase was BS and there was a ticky tack PI that was also, I thought, a bad call. Otherwise it was a pretty typical Bengals game as far as penalties go. We are one of the least penalized teams in the NFL.

You guys are passionate fans and hurt by the loss so I am not trying to stir sht up. Just trying to bring some opposite view points. Peace

Welcome, and agreed. There's always a lot of bias that goes into these threads, as with any forum for any sport, and we often ignore or blindly accept whatever happens on the opponent's side of things while diving head first into any supposed wrongdoing for the Chiefs.

And when there are obvious calls, like the holding on the kickoff return, it becomes a slope of "that's never called" or "you can call that every play".

And if you're part of Bengals Board, tell your mods to lighten up a little and allow other fans... it's more fun that way. :)

Red Dawg 01-04-2022 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bengal_Guy (Post 16052002)
I registered just for this thread. The Bengals had two penalties called on them on the final drive. Same number as Chiefs. Both were killer. One took them out of relatively easy FG range and is often a drive killer...holding on 1st and 10 at 24 yard line to 1st and 20 at the 34...why call THAT flag if they wanted Bengals to win?

On goal line, the offsetting penalties cost Bengals a TD. IF no holding call on Bengals, Mixon would have been given a TD on review. Ball crossed before his elbow hit, you can look it up. So refs not only called a penalty on Bengals they also marked him down short. Neither seem indicative of refs nudging Bengals to win. Boyd had to adjust his helmet after the hands to the face...do you really think if the roles were reversed you wouldn't agree with that penalty if it was on Hill?

On Pringles TD...the flag was thrown well before it was obvious he would return for a TD and he was obviously held. The refs had no way to know at that moment of the penalty he would run it back.

I thought the unnecessary roughness call on Chase was BS and there was a ticky tack PI that was also, I thought, a bad call. Otherwise it was a pretty typical Bengals game as far as penalties go. We are one of the least penalized teams in the NFL.

You guys are passionate fans and hurt by the loss so I am not trying to stir sht up. Just trying to bring some opposite view points. Peace

Least penalized teams? Exactly the point. Joe is becoming a star. Chase is already there. The league wants you in the playoffs and we were housing your ass. So here comes the flags to get control and they did. 6 times they gave you a first down from flags. If not for the flags we would have kicked you ass. 5 were on 3rd down when we stopped you.

Bengal_Guy 01-04-2022 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 16052029)
You guys have a shitload of young talent. Lots of potential. Hopefully we'll see many more competitive games like that over the next few years.

Oddly...it looks like we get you guys at Paul Brown Stadium again next year...not sure why it's not alternating. If we managed to win a game in playoffs we could also face you at Arrowhead in division round. So could be three times over this year and next.

Here’s a look at who the Bengals will play on the 2022 schedule.

Home:

PIT
BAL
CLE
BUF
MIA
ATL
CAR
KC

Away:

PIT
BAL
CLE
NE
NYJ
NO
TB
TEN
DAL

Bengal_Guy 01-04-2022 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Dawg (Post 16052039)
Least penalized teams? Exactly the point. Joe is becoming a star. Chase is already there. The league wants you in the playoffs and we were housing your ass. So here comes the flags to get control and they did. 6 times they gave you a first down from flags. If not for the flags we would have kicked you ass. 5 were on 3rd down when we stopped you.

I sure wish they would have lent us a hand in OT losses vs Packers and Chargers!

frozenchief 01-04-2022 01:20 PM

Interesting info about the effect of the penalties on the KC/Cin game:


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Bengals?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Bengals</a> gained over 60% Win Probability from penalties in their Week 17 win over the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a><br><br>It was the 3rd largest WP gained from penalties in any <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NFL?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NFL</a> game this year<br><br>The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Eagles?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Eagles</a> again overcame a large WP loss from penalties and clinched a spot in the playoffs<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NFLStats?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NFLStats</a> <a href="https://t.co/aGLQU8oUzi">pic.twitter.com/aGLQU8oUzi</a></p>&mdash; acCOUNTable refs (@AcCOUNTableRefs) <a href="https://twitter.com/AcCOUNTableRefs/status/1478432910449549315?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 4, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

ThaVirus 01-04-2022 01:23 PM

There might have been a few questionable calls, but I'd point to any number of Chase catches (Sorenson blown coverage, the one where he outran literally our entire defense, and 3rd and 27), a dipshit penalty by that other white guy on our roster who I also hate on the kick return TD, Hill's dropped pass before halftime, or just putting up 3 points total in the entire second half before I really get into the officiating.

Plus, why would the NFL want to rig this game for Cinci? What sense does that make? Their market is just as small as KC's. Plus they've been historically bad. No one gives a shit about seeing the Bengals in the postseason.

And by hurting us, they help the Titans. Why? Now there's a good shot the AFCCG is played in Nashville. It's a cool party city and decent weekend travel spot for basic chicks, but the football world gives no shits about it. Another AFCCG at Arrowhead would be a lot cooler.

Red Dawg 01-04-2022 01:23 PM

^ Well there you have it.

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2022 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frozenchief (Post 16052066)
Interesting info about the effect of the penalties on the KC/Cin game:


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Bengals?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Bengals</a> gained over 60% Win Probability from penalties in their Week 17 win over the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a><br><br>It was the 3rd largest WP gained from penalties in any <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NFL?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NFL</a> game this year<br><br>The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Eagles?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Eagles</a> again overcame a large WP loss from penalties and clinched a spot in the playoffs<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NFLStats?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NFLStats</a> <a href="https://t.co/aGLQU8oUzi">pic.twitter.com/aGLQU8oUzi</a></p>&mdash; acCOUNTable refs (@AcCOUNTableRefs) <a href="https://twitter.com/AcCOUNTableRefs/status/1478432910449549315?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 4, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I saw this too but they have like 400 followers and they aren't transparent on how they collect/interpret data.

Though if you're inclined to believe, it's interesting that KC/CIN was only 3rd most impactful game of the season regarding penalties.

Some here would lead you to believe it was the most egregious match fixing in the history of sport.

Bearcat 01-04-2022 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bengal_Guy (Post 16052043)
Oddly...it looks like we get you guys at Paul Brown Stadium again next year...not sure why it's not alternating. If we managed to win a game in playoffs we could also face you at Arrowhead in division round. So could be three times over this year and next.

Here’s a look at who the Bengals will play on the 2022 schedule.

Home:

PIT
BAL
CLE
BUF
MIA
ATL
CAR
KC

Away:

PIT
BAL
CLE
NE
NYJ
NO
TB
TEN
DAL

This year was based on divisional alignment, where all AFCW teams played all AFCN teams... and that is on a home/road rotation, so in a few years the game will be at Arrowhead.

Next season they'll play because they're both 1st place teams. I'm sure there's some reason for home vs away, but it's not tied to the divisional rotation.

Bengal_Guy 01-04-2022 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 16052104)
This year was based on divisional alignment, where all AFCW teams played all AFCN teams... and that is on a home/road rotation, so in a few years the game will be at Arrowhead.

Next season they'll play because they're both 1st place teams. I'm sure there's some reason for home vs away, but it's not tied to the divisional rotation.

Ah ok thanks for the clarification

SupDock 01-04-2022 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bengal_Guy (Post 16052002)
I registered just for this thread. The Bengals had two penalties called on them on the final drive. Same number as Chiefs. Both were killer. One took them out of relatively easy FG range and is often a drive killer...holding on 1st and 10 at 24 yard line to 1st and 20 at the 34...why call THAT flag if they wanted Bengals to win?

On goal line, the offsetting penalties cost Bengals a TD. IF no holding call on Bengals, Mixon would have been given a TD on review. Ball crossed before his elbow hit, you can look it up. So refs not only called a penalty on Bengals they also marked him down short. Neither seem indicative of refs nudging Bengals to win. Boyd had to adjust his helmet after the hands to the face...do you really think if the roles were reversed you wouldn't agree with that penalty if it was on Hill?

On Pringles TD...the flag was thrown well before it was obvious he would return for a TD and he was obviously held. The refs had no way to know at that moment of the penalty he would run it back.

I thought the unnecessary roughness call on Chase was BS and there was a ticky tack PI that was also, I thought, a bad call. Otherwise it was a pretty typical Bengals game as far as penalties go. We are one of the least penalized teams in the NFL.

You guys are passionate fans and hurt by the loss so I am not trying to stir sht up. Just trying to bring some opposite view points. Peace

You forgot the two uncalled false start penalties and the failure to call delay of game on the final drive.

Dayze 01-04-2022 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Dawg (Post 16051865)
I certainly don't think every game is rigged but football is a business and it's worth so many billions that it isn't left totally up to chance in my opinion. No business this valuable would be.

Before Goodell I think it was pretty clean but since he took over I don't think it is. Kraft got him the job and it just so happens he gets 3 rings immediately and Brady is constantly getting big calls at the right time even after the mass video tape stuff that the league totally covered up. That scandal was massively big and they destroyed the evidence. Brady games have hosed us hard with officiating to say the least.

Al Davis sues the other owners the same year as the tuck rule game. It was an obvious fumble to everyone in America. Coincidence?

Katrina hit and the Saints win the SB. Is that not odd?

LA gets the Rams and then the famous no call PI gets them to the SB. Coincidence?

Manning goes to Denver and in his worse season ever gets another ring, then walks away.

These are just a few situations that don't compute but there are more shady games. The Bengals game is just like insane. Give me a break with all those game changing flags. One after another and 3 were totally bogus.

and didn't Jerome Bettis go out as a SB Champ in his final game in his home town in Detroit when Detroit hosted it?

saphojunkie 01-04-2022 02:00 PM

The only truly atrocious call was illegal hands to the face on 4th and goal with a tie game and 33 seconds left.

In basketball, you'd say "swallow your whistle."

You can't throw that flag. You can't. It's just unacceptable.

comochiefsfan 01-04-2022 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 16052169)
The only truly atrocious call was illegal hands to the face on 4th and goal with a tie game and 33 seconds left.

In basketball, you'd say "swallow your whistle."

You can't throw that flag. You can't. It's just unacceptable.

Idk man. It was pretty blatant. Nothing ticky tack should be called there, but Boyd's head got turned sideways.

That shit is on Fenton, not the refs.

Dayze 01-04-2022 02:05 PM

at a minimum / in general, I think games are steered to stay a 1 possession game for as long as possible during the game to peoples eyes stay on the TV and commercials.

I have no idea what the stats of that are; ..but it always seems like margin of victory in most games is like 4 or 10.

Frazod 01-04-2022 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Dawg (Post 16051865)
I certainly don't think every game is rigged but football is a business and it's worth so many billions that it isn't left totally up to chance in my opinion. No business this valuable would be.

Before Goodell I think it was pretty clean but since he took over I don't think it is. Kraft got him the job and it just so happens he gets 3 rings immediately and Brady is constantly getting big calls at the right time even after the mass video tape stuff that the league totally covered up. That scandal was massively big and they destroyed the evidence. Brady games have hosed us hard with officiating to say the least.

Al Davis sues the other owners the same year as the tuck rule game. It was an obvious fumble to everyone in America. Coincidence?

Katrina hit and the Saints win the SB. Is that not odd?

LA gets the Rams and then the famous no call PI gets them to the SB. Coincidence?

Manning goes to Denver and in his worse season ever gets another ring, then walks away.

These are just a few situations that don't compute but there are more shady games. The Bengals game is just like insane. Give me a break with all those game changing flags. One after another and 3 were totally bogus.

Don't forget, we won our second Super Bowl exactly 50 years after winning our first. That made for a great story, too.

Do I think the league conspired to get the Chiefs that win? No. But I do think they didn't pull their usual machinations to stop it, either. Remember when Miami beat New England to help secure us a bye? Normally the ref$ would have NEVER allowed the Dolphins to score on that final drive. But during that one game there were no obvious/questionable Brady-saving flags thrown. That just.... never happens. But it did that day.

We're a small market team with a limited fanbase. Even having Mahomes can't change that. I don't think the league will ever pull out all the stops to actually help us win like they've done with so many other teams. The best we can hope for is that they call a rare honest game.

Rainbarrel 01-04-2022 02:13 PM

This game mirrors SB LV too much. Not to trigger PTSD( players handled it pretty well)

TimBone 01-04-2022 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bengal_Guy (Post 16052043)
Oddly...it looks like we get you guys at Paul Brown Stadium again next year...not sure why it's not alternating. If we managed to win a game in playoffs we could also face you at Arrowhead in division round. So could be three times over this year and next.



Here’s a look at who the Bengals will play on the 2022 schedule.



Home:



PIT

BAL

CLE

BUF

MIA

ATL

CAR

KC



Away:



PIT

BAL

CLE

NE

NYJ

NO

TB

TEN

DAL

in Cincy again?

RIGGED!

Red Dawg 01-04-2022 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 16052162)
and didn't Jerome Bettis go out as a SB Champ in his final game in his home town in Detroit when Detroit hosted it?

Yes he did and Ben was given a td but he was short of the goal line
Plain as day.

eDave 01-04-2022 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bengal_Guy (Post 16052020)
Appreciate the welcome...I have enjoyed reading the board these last few days as the Chiefs and their success are what we aspire to become.

Why don't you guys allow fans of opposing teams to post on your forum?

Mecca 01-04-2022 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PackerinMo (Post 16051879)
Don’t forget Jerome Bettis winning a SB in his hometown and the Harbaugh brothers facing off in the big one.

That Seattle/Pitt SB is one of the most rigged games I've seen.

Mecca 01-04-2022 03:19 PM

Also Chiefs/Broncos was moved to a stand alone Saturday game, Chiefs win Sunday that probably doesn't happen...

Bengal_Guy 01-04-2022 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 16052326)
Why don't you guys allow fans of opposing teams to post on your forum?

The Bengals Board(dot)com? I honestly wasn't aware we didn't. Has someone tried to register and was denied? I always like seeing fans of other teams post in my other teams forums.

lcarus 01-04-2022 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 16052073)
There might have been a few questionable calls, but I'd point to any number of Chase catches (Sorenson blown coverage, the one where he outran literally our entire defense, and 3rd and 27), a dipshit penalty by that other white guy on our roster who I also hate on the kick return TD, Hill's dropped pass before halftime, or just putting up 3 points total in the entire second half before I really get into the officiating.

Plus, why would the NFL want to rig this game for Cinci? What sense does that make? Their market is just as small as KC's. Plus they've been historically bad. No one gives a shit about seeing the Bengals in the postseason.

And by hurting us, they help the Titans. Why? Now there's a good shot the AFCCG is played in Nashville. It's a cool party city and decent weekend travel spot for basic chicks, but the football world gives no shits about it. Another AFCCG at Arrowhead would be a lot cooler.

The moral of the story is: no more white safeties. You'd think the Chiefs would've figured this out by now.

Bearcat 01-04-2022 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bengal_Guy (Post 16052340)
The Bengals Board(dot)com? I honestly wasn't aware we didn't. Has someone tried to register and was denied? I always like seeing fans of other teams post in my other teams forums.

At least 3 or 4 of us tried, as we wanted to be part of the "what Chiefs fans are saying" thread and welcome people to register here... but, we were all denied, except one person who registered as a Bengals fan. Never even got to post. :shrug:

ThaVirus 01-04-2022 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 16052361)
The moral of the story is: no more white safeties. You'd think the Chiefs would've figured this out by now.

I couldn't believe that dumbass committed that penalty at that moment. It had no effect on the play; he didn't even need to do it.

Cost us 7 and a shit ton of momentum.

ToxSocks 01-04-2022 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bengal_Guy (Post 16052340)
The Bengals Board(dot)com? I honestly wasn't aware we didn't. Has someone tried to register and was denied? I always like seeing fans of other teams post in my other teams forums.

Not just Bengals forums, most forums are that way. This forum is a rare bird where we welcome the opportunity to shit on opposing fans.

It seems like most fan bases around the league are way too sensitive for that.

eDave 01-04-2022 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16052376)
Not just Bengals forums, most forums are that way. This forum is a rare bird where we welcome the opportunity to shit on opposing fans.

It seems like most fan bases around the league are way too sensitive for that.

Don't be like that. We only shit on them if they are ****heads first.

Dartgod 01-04-2022 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 16052382)
Don't be like that. We only shit on them if they are ****heads first.

This guy seems cool, but someone is intent on keeping him his rep red. ROFL

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2022 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 16052169)
The only truly atrocious call was illegal hands to the face on 4th and goal with a tie game and 33 seconds left.

In basketball, you'd say "swallow your whistle."

You can't throw that flag. You can't. It's just unacceptable.

LOL Boyd's helmet was turned sideways on his head.

Dartgod 01-04-2022 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16052443)
LOL Boyd's helmet was turned sideways on his head.

I've been looking for the replay of that and can't find it.

ChiefsCountry 01-04-2022 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod (Post 16052889)
I've been looking for the replay of that and can't find it.

NFL hides it rigging duh. ;)

GloryDayz 01-04-2022 10:11 PM

So far I've learned that if we don't play the perfect game, great game plan, not bad coaching decisions, no blown plays, all the sins committed by the zebras are forgiven.

I'm not lost that we maybe could have overcome the sins of the zebras, but at some point they should be evaluated on their performance outside of the players mistakes. From calling things both ways, to selectively swallowing their whistle, to flat-out just not calling things because "those things happen on every play", at some point there has to be a separation between each group's individual performances.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.