I guess I Don't understand why the guy is going for a tackle? He could have just blocked it #mizzou
|
Refs 1 - Mizzou 0
|
Quote:
|
Wow.
I think the first two calls were right (it wasn't a fumble and not targeting), but I'm not sure I agree with that call. I guess it's because he got the punt off. |
That is a screwjob....and I question whether he was really in the Tackle box....
|
Quote:
That one I'm not sure. It's close because the snap was botched but he got the punt off. That is awful to have a close game even have that play. |
What a joke.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Always something with MU. Never seen anything like it
|
SEC officials will always side with their own.
Mizzou is the Big 12 implant that will always get the shaft on borderline calls / close games. It is what it is. |
Quote:
Total **** job by the refs. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
They’re scripted losses, they make Mizzou lose the same way every year. SEC will make sure they are never competitive again.
|
they did the ole dave toub play
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Refs refuse to let us win this gsme
|
Quote:
I guess Mizzou REALLY pissed some of the old school guard off when they won the SEC East two of those first 3 years in the league. They’re gonna make sure nothing like that ever even has a slight chance of happening again. I get it. They know where there bread is buttered. Gotta take care of your boys. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
These refs need to be put in a firing squad
|
Quote:
‘Just be grateful we allowed you to join our premier conference’ Different rules for different fools. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If I were the Mizzou player in that same situation, I would've done the exact same thing. |
I don’t think I’ve ever blamed the refs for a loss becasue it’s such a weak-minded Pete thing to do, but this was squarely on the refs. The ball was coming out and the punt…lol come on. Not to mention their receivers pushed off consistently.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Also, current mood after getting another win in CoMo, just like 2018.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">BALLLINNNNNNNN.<a href="https://twitter.com/UKFootball?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@UKFootball</a>'s Mark Stoops crowd-surfing to Mo Bamba > all other celebrations. <a href="https://t.co/TvtaYv5dZ7">pic.twitter.com/TvtaYv5dZ7</a></p>— FOX College Football (@CFBONFOX) <a href="https://twitter.com/CFBONFOX/status/1056352264300879872?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 28, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Quote:
|
Quote:
NO ONE (outside of Mizzou fans, of course) wants to see Mizzou be even remotely successful in the SEC. They just don’t. And why would they? There is no benefit to the SEC if Mizzou wins and is competitive. There just isn’t. And like I said before, I DO think Mizzou REALLY pissed some people in the SEC off when they won the East two of those first 3 years in the league. They want to make sure something like that never even has a remote chance of happening again. Best way to do that is keep Mizzou buried at the bottom. Like I said, I get it. It is what it is. |
Quote:
Additionally, Mizzou geographically isn't rivals with anyone in the SEC aside from maybe Arkansas. None of the premier revenue sports Mizzou competes are they remotely a powerhouse or national power in. |
So the SEC decided to screw Mizzou…thus making the climb to have one of their schools be bowl eligible really difficult….
TOTALLY CHECKS OUT. Christ some of you need to get out and touch some grass lol…the big bad SEC isn’t out to get Mizzou. How about we focus on the real issues with this team? The fact the QB is an abomination and the dummy coach keeps running him out there. |
Quote:
Mizzou never did a good job with branding. And I think the SEC would rather see traditional teams succeed than Mizzou. Missourians love the Cardinals and Chiefs, that’s who they are most passionate for. Not Mizzou I think SEC people see this and compare our situation with places like South Carolina. That’s a school with no real success in football (first bowl win in 1995) but are assumed to be a better team than Mizzou every year (even when we beat them regularly). It’s because they have a better brand and marketing than we do, and a more passionate fan base. The SEC would rather see those kinds of teams win than Mizzou. We’re an outsider here, just like Arkansas probably felt like an outsider in the All-Texas SWC conference. It is what it is |
Quote:
The SEC is fine with this. 8-4 UK and 5-7 Mizzou going bowling looks better than 7-5 UK and 6-6 Mizzou |
Quote:
Part of that also has to do with the schools located near or in the region. Yes, Mizzou is the only FBS school in the state, but Kansas, Illinois, Arkansas, Iowa aren't too far either. And with middling success or short bursts that aren't sustained, that gets you nowhere. |
Kentucky has their ceiling as well, no matter how competitive they get or what favor they receive from officials they will still never play for a National Championship.
|
Kentucky football is a ****ing joke. Absolutely GIVEN the game
|
Quote:
I'll take bowl eligibility in a sport that people continue to say that Kentucky has no business in competing in while winning titles in basketball. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Kentucky is an ‘outsider’ in their own way, just not in the same way as Mizzou. |
Quote:
Kansas has a number of fans in Kansas City. People move here and cheer for a blue blood basketball team over a 6-6 football team that can’t decide what it’s logo is Iowa has good branding and is consistent, and is usually playing above .500 football. Not alot of Iowa fans in Missouri but they do have a legit brand Arkansas has a solid brand and certainly has some fans in southern Missouri. I think with the success of Pinkel you see a lot more Missouri fans in that region than before, though. |
Quote:
Mizzou isn't. Not a remotely comparable situation. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And OK. Quote:
|
Quote:
Aside from that, you’re kind of making my point for me regarding Mizzou vs. Kentucky. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
1. Knoxville 2. Lexington 3. Athens 4. CoMo 5. Tuscaloosa 6. Auburn |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Wait until basketball season starts in the Kansas thread. ;) |
Kentucky players were literally throwing punches at Mizzou players on the sideline during that scuffle. At the very least, it should have been off setting penalties.
I would say it will be interesting to see when the SEC takes a look at it this week to see if any further decisions to be made, but we all know how that will turn out. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But you know that already. You’re being purposely obtuse because you don’t want to admit that your team won due to the officiating. |
Quote:
I'd be pissed if Kentucky lost the way Mizzou did. I get it. But Mizzou had 4 quarters to outscore Kentucky, didn't, and made crucial mistakes throughout the game. |
Quote:
The obvious tone when speaking of Mizzou is one of disdain. You may not hear it now, but it is obvious when the local sports broadcasters (most of whom are old guard SEC) talk about playing Mizzou. |
Quote:
No one cares here in Alabama and Kentucky's been either too irrelevant in football or too dominant in basketball to have a rival. |
The history of a program should be immaterial. The rules should be applied in a straightforward fashion. We all know that doesn't happen. It was awful at Allen Field House when we were in the previous conferences, but this is an entirely new beast.
Every game they play in conference they get ****ed over. This was the most egregious I've yet seen. Mizzou could hire Don Draper to design an ad campaign and pour tens of millions into market research and advertising, but it's not going to change the fact that they are going to get continually ****ed over because they aren't one of the good ol' boys. Even if they had the talent of the early 2000's Miami Hurricanes it wouldn't matter, because the conference is bound and determined to **** them over. It's not a matter of this happening one time, five times, or twenty times, it happens all the time. Eventually, it's not just an accident. The BOC should have just bided their time and joined the Big Ten. |
Quote:
I was so pissed at the Chris Jones call in the AFC championship game when he barely grazed Brady’s face mask with his arm and a 3 and out turned into a touchdown drive. But this game didn’t happen in a vacuum and it was criminal what the refs did to us today. To celebrate this win as a true win is weak as ****. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It is what it is. Drink needs to not be a shit play caller and actually get a real QB. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And I bet it is that way in Athens, Knoxville and Tuscaloosa when Mizzou is brought up in football conversations. If you Don't think there is an Old Guard SEC clique you are a bit jaded. |
Quote:
Each team in the playoff is an extra $6 million for the SEC. |
Oh...for clarification sake....the biggest problem Mizzou had today was a QB that wore Black and Gold and couldn't beat a HS football team.
|
Quote:
|
The ref that spotted that 1st down that was clearly at least a yard short should be investigated. He walked at a 45 degree angle to spot it and emphatically waved for a 1st down. That was just blatant cheating.
|
Quote:
But I'm saying Mizzou is too irrelevant for a majority of the states to care one way or another, partially due to success and partially due to location. The same meat heads say the same dumb shit over and over. I get it. Kentucky gets bashed too (deservedly so) because of their historic success or lack thereof. Win big consistently and it goes away. |
Agreed completely. But Kentucky-Mizzou has nothing to do with that. There wasn’t some SEC conspiracy. It was simply really bad officiating and terrible QB play.
|
Quote:
And probably so. Enjoy your weekend and please win in Knoxville next week. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.