Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 12635487)

I think most QB play... good or bad... is conducive to playcalling. Particularly when the playcalling consists of so many sideways plays that have proven to be useless. Particularly when the ball is not going to your clear and proven playmakers.

Is Alex a good enough QB to overcome the playcalling? Though the win column suggests yes.. I think we all can see past that a bit.

I'm still locked in on Andy being the clear frontrunner of offensive problems.

Until he cuts the offense loose for entire games (within reason), and we see Alex sink or swim on this approach, Andy Reid remains the prime suspect.

Originally Posted by Snica (Post 12635422)

RAndom picture thread. :)
http://globalgamejam.org/sites/defau...?itok=9dymM8JD

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12635503)

So.....Reid's fault? Got it.

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 12635487)

I think most QB play... good or bad... is conducive to playcalling. Particularly when the playcalling consists of so many sideways plays that have proven to be useless. Particularly when the ball is not going to your clear and proven playmakers.

Is Alex a good enough QB to overcome the playcalling? Though the win column suggests yes.. I think we all can see past that a bit.

I'm still locked in on Andy being the clear frontrunner of offensive problems.

Until he cuts the offense loose for entire games (within reason), and we see Alex sink or swim on this approach, Andy Reid remains the prime suspect.

Originally Posted by Dagnabit (Post 12635552)

Now that Smith no longer runs, the offense has really taken a nose-dive.

Originally Posted by Dagnabit (Post 12635552)

I'm beginning to understand Sacc's wisdom in wanting to acquire an RB in round 1, though that usually is not the way most teams would go. With no dynamic threat in the backfield, the Chiefs offense doesn't stand much chance of getting back to it's best performance in this particular era of the franchise.

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12635562)

Offense took a nosedive? We have the same total yards/game as last season. 331 yards/game.

Fact.

Can't wait to see how you move the goalposts this time.

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12635581)

Hard to take a nosedive when your nose is already in the shit.

Our $17M a year, franchise QB is leading the 23rd overall offense.

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 12635596)

23rd in what? yardage? That would appear to be what you base that ranking on.

So let me ask you this, and keep it real...

The defense.. in yardage.. is ranked 26th in yards given up.

Tell me, is this a fair representation of how awful the defense is?

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12635598)

How many points has the offense scored versus what the defense has scored?

EDIT: And I'm only using yardage because that's what reerunBob brought up.

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 12635604)

so you agree that to judge the O off of yardage is as dumb as judging the D on yardage... yes?

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12635625)

How about this?

Offensive Points - 164
Defense/STs Points - 152

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12635625)

How about this?

Offensive Points - 164
Defense/STs Points - 152

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12635625)

How about this?

Offensive Points - 164
Defense/STs Points - 152

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 12635634)

so you are not going to directly answer my question... and here, I thought it time for genuine discussion. Guess not?