ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Let's Talk About Baltimore (AFC Championship) (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=351915)

FloridaMan88 01-25-2024 01:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StalkRavenMad (Post 17361656)
That's tjw same way the Raven Lost to the Browns getting out of rush lanes allowing Watsin to escape the pocket. And Wa5sin Literally had a perfect half against the Ravens. I mean I can't even think of the JAG that picked Mahomes and returned it while pointng at him. These things happen to everyone but the Chiefs.

Paging a Lamar-bonics translator.

Why Not? 01-25-2024 01:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StalkRavenMad (Post 17361657)
Chiefs fans are going to disrespect a top 3 TE in the league.

ROFL. He wouldn't go top 3 in a TE draft this week (talking about remaining TE)

OneWinningDrive 01-25-2024 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Why Not? (Post 17361658)
But, see, that's my point. Fans can ooh and ahh and get excited or freaked out or whatever they want to do. My bet is that if Andrews plays, Spags handles him the same way he would Chuck Kolar. If you think in a key moment in the game Andrews is pulling Sneed away from an actual threat, I think you're wrong.

I just cited an example of a player who had the same injury and then came back and put up a monster game. It's clearly not impossible, so how could Spagnuolo have the confidence to say with certainty that the all pro tight end is a gimp and should be ignored? That's a pretty risky proposition sight unseen. Spagnuolo has no more information than you or I about Andrews' status except that he has been a full participant in practice and has to be accounted for as if he's going to be active. You're hand waving Mark Andrews away in a fashion that I'm sure no one in the Chiefs' building can afford to do. So even if Andrews doesn't actually have nine catches for 122 yards, he has to be gameplanned for.

Why Not? 01-25-2024 01:34 AM

LMAO
Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 17361660)
Paging a Lamar-bonics translator.


FloridaMan88 01-25-2024 01:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneWinningDrive (Post 17361662)
I just cited an example of a player who had the same injury and then came back and put up a monster game.

TO is a HOF player… Mark Andrews is not.

JFC you Ravens fans have no game… try harder.

LMAO

Why Not? 01-25-2024 01:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneWinningDrive (Post 17361662)
I just cited an example of a player who had the same injury and then came back and put up a monster game. It's clearly not impossible, so how could Spagnuolo have the confidence to say with certainty that the all pro tight end is a gimp and should be ignored? That's a pretty risky proposition sight unseen. Spagnuolo has no more information than you or I about Andrews' status except that he has been a full participant in practice and has to be accounted for as if he's going to be active. You're hand waving Mark Andrews away in a fashion that I'm sure no one in the Chiefs' building can afford to do. So even if Andrews doesn't actually have nine catches for 122 yards, he has to be gameplanned for.

This is a lot of posturing for a dude I bet ends up being inactive anyway. If he is active, we shall see how it plays out but I bet you I'm right and Spags sees through the window dressing decoy that Andrews will be if he's out there Sunday. I'll be right here to admit I was wrong if Andrews does anything, even as a decoy, that actually effects the outcome.

OneWinningDrive 01-25-2024 01:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Why Not? (Post 17361661)
ROFL. He wouldn't go top 3 in a TE draft this week (talking about remaining TE)

Well then we damn well know Travis Kelce wouldn't be either given that Andrews had more touchdowns than Kelce in his ten games to Kelce's 15 and Andrews had a higher yards per target than Kelce.

OneWinningDrive 01-25-2024 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Why Not? (Post 17361661)
ROFL. He wouldn't go top 3 in a TE draft this week (talking about remaining TE)

1. LaPorta/Kittle
2. LaPorta/Kittle
3. Likely
4. Andrews
5. Kelce

Guess you're right, Andrews isn't in the top three.

FloridaMan88 01-25-2024 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneWinningDrive (Post 17361667)
Well then we damn well know Travis Kelce wouldn't be either given that Andrews had more touchdowns than Kelce in his ten games to Kelce's 15 and Andrews had a higher yards per target than Kelce.

And yet every team in the league would still take Kelce over Mark Andrews.

Including the Ravens.

DRM08 01-25-2024 01:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 17361665)
TO is a HOF player… Mark Andrews is not.

JFC you Ravens fans have no game… try harder.

LMAO

That's a weird statement. Andrews is a pretty damn good player in the current NFL. Certainly a valuable player in the Ravens offense.

Why Not? 01-25-2024 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneWinningDrive (Post 17361667)
Well then we damn well know Travis Kelce wouldn't be either given that Andrews had more touchdowns than Kelce in his ten games to Kelce's 15 and Andrews had a higher yards per target than Kelce.

Hold on....let me make sure you understand me so I don't write you off as a total jabroni (when I actually think, IMO, you've been the most civil and engaging Ravens fan here.....)

I'm saying, you are a GM drafting a team to play this weekend, pulling from the player pool you have from the 4 remaining teams. You are drafting TEs and you have the first choice in said TEs.

Look me in the internet eye and tell me with a straight face you are not taking Travis Kelce with that pick.

OneWinningDrive 01-25-2024 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 17361670)
And yet every team in the league would still take Kelce over Mark Andrews.

Including the Ravens.

I guarantee the Ravens would not. Andrews and Lamar have as strong of a connection as Mahomes and Kelce do. Kelce is 34. All due respect to one of the best to ever do it, but the Ravens would not make that trade straight up.

Why Not? 01-25-2024 01:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneWinningDrive (Post 17361669)
1. LaPorta/Kittle
2. LaPorta/Kittle
3. Likely
4. Andrews
5. Kelce

Guess you're right, Andrews isn't in the top three.

Holy shit! I was wrong I guess. You are, indeed, a total jabroni.

FloridaMan88 01-25-2024 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRM08 (Post 17361671)
That's a weird statement. Andrews is a pretty damn good player in the current NFL. Certainly a valuable player in the Ravens offense.

Doesn’t mean he has the ability to come back and have the same impact that TO had after a major ankle injury.

TO had 9 catches for 122 yards receiving in his return from a major ankle injury.

Are you suggesting that Andrews will have anything close to that type of performance if he plays Sunday?

FloridaMan88 01-25-2024 01:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneWinningDrive (Post 17361673)
I guarantee the Ravens would not. Andrews and Lamar have as strong of a connection as Mahomes and Kelce do. Kelce is 34. All due respect to one of the best to ever do it, but the Ravens would not make that trade straight up.

How many Super Bowls has Lamar/Andrew’s “strong connection” won?

How many playoff games?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.