![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Because even if they get the best of Andy/PM for a quarter, if they stay in a bear front the whole damn game, those two WILL unlock it and by the 4th quarter they'll be marching up and down the field. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Everything I've read is that the Eagles run their defense the way they run it and they don't make a lot of situational adjustments. That's going to be a huge problem for them because the only real way to slow Mahomes down is to mix up coverages and rush packages so that he can't settle in. If they don't switch it up, it's going to be a long day for their defense. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
On the other side of it, if they feel confident emough to get home with 4 then they will have no reason to blitz. |
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">KC won't do the split back stuff as much (unless it's the Toney package maybe?) but I love testing PHI's 5-down (Penny here) fronts with RPOs. If that DE has to drop because of formation, test him with bubbles/swing, see how they handle it from base <a href="https://t.co/b2gLxWcc4b">pic.twitter.com/b2gLxWcc4b</a></p>— Nate Christensen (@natech32) <a href="https://twitter.com/natech32/status/1623895973318516736?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 10, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
This split back play is pretty awesome, I'd steal that. |
Quote:
The only thing that can really slow down the Chiefs offense is poor execution, IMO. And if you start sending heat, you speed them up and may actually HELP them get locked in. It's like a manager putting on a hit and run call when he has a hitter struggling. Now the hitter HAS to swing the bat and maybe he gets out of his own head and finds the barrel. You blitz Mahomes early and you're going to immediately get him focused. And if that happens, you're boned. |
Quote:
He needs to get the ball |
Quote:
We've seen it - the Chiefs are the best team in the league at those 10-12 play drives, despite not being a real running team. It's all about efficiency and the Eagles really have to play to that. If they blitz him, they risk giving up a big play and they just can't afford that the way they play offense. |
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I'm sure PHI has built in more counters since but man their offense just devolves after getting looks of pressure. It's either Go-balls or screens<br><br>You can bait them by dropping everyone out, and DBs can play much more downhill because playcalls get simpler<br><br>Unleash the clip <a href="https://t.co/x6FsE377iv">pic.twitter.com/x6FsE377iv</a></p>— Nate Christensen (@natech32) <a href="https://twitter.com/natech32/status/1622788009069256704?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 7, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
Quote:
So who do you feel had the bigger advantage? The 49er DLine vs that KC OLine? Or Philly's Dline vs. this Oline for KC? I think that might be a better gauge then a straight head to head comparison of the two Dlines. |
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The #1 thing Vance Joseph did; he blitzed the crap out of Hurts<br><br>Blitzing took offense completely out of rhythm. Passing game isn't well-built to counter lot of blitzing, since Hurts in MOF is just not a great option<br><br>Had to resort to a ton of screens, and ARI got a beat on those <a href="https://t.co/Xlosp2edr2">pic.twitter.com/Xlosp2edr2</a></p>— Nate Christensen (@natech32) <a href="https://twitter.com/natech32/status/1622785659944505344?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 7, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
Quote:
|
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Terrific bait by Vance Joseph here. Motion ID's the man, but they still get rotation into C1, drop that WS safety down. Hurts sees but doesn't look off S in any way, he's able to drop post-snap into hole<br><br>If S wasn't there, good read, but no manipulation of S leads to near INT <a href="https://t.co/cTWz0rBxi2">pic.twitter.com/cTWz0rBxi2</a></p>— Nate Christensen (@natech32) <a href="https://twitter.com/natech32/status/1622783013321859072?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 7, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.