Please answer the bold questions. I am fine with that response for 2009, although I don't blame him for OC/DC decisions his first year as a head coach. I am guessing most rookie head coaches make mistakes like that. Again, the tougher questions please.

We had 180 yards rushing and held the 0-4 Colts scoreless for an entire half and we still barely beat them.

I don't see your point. :shrug:

With Charles on offense, are we going to do much better than 180 yards rushing?

With Berry on defense, are we going to do much better than holding the Colts scoreless for an entire half?

The Packers had huge injury problems last year and won the Super Bowl, so I'm not going to give Haley a free pass just because of injuries.

I will give him a pass for being stuck with Cassel for three years. JMO.

He has the option of not sending him on the field. JMO.

It was good to see the D make adjustments at halftime.

Indy isn't that bad. If Manning were healthy, they'd be 3-2 maybe 4-1.

Then your opinion is factually incorrect.
A) he has not had viable alternatives
B) he would get shitcanned by Pioli

Although I can see how constant wildcat formations could improve the offense. [/sarcasm]

You think Stanzi would do worse than Cassel? I mean... I know throwing 5 yard slants is a lot to ask, but...

Aaron Rodgers

I am about as big of a "cassel-hater" as you can find, but I still can't answer that. I don't have enough information. The head coach might. Hell, he might even agree with you but be unable to pull Cassel due to pressure from Pioli.

I'm not expecting the Chiefs to win the Super Bowl.

gochiefs is still a worthless troll without a mind of his own. I wouldn't expect him to understand this.

The only way Pioli would fire Haley for switching QB's is if it completely ****ing flopped and blew the Chiefs chances of making the playoffs.

My point is, if you have a stud QB, you can overcome a lot.