Here's the deal with Landry - he looks the part. Good size, pocket passer and he has a really good arm. But, and I don't know if it is because of his mental makeup, or conservative coaching, or a combo of both - he doesn't trust or have confidence in his arm. He doesn't try to fit the ball in tight places. He doesn't look as smooth as Barkley or Griffin under pressure.

Kyle ****ing Orton is now the best QB on our roster.

How the **** could we NOT have a better option at QB on the board when we pick?...

The Chiefs need to stop being a scared organization. The safe choice isn't going to work for us.

Totally agree with that. I see so many fans saying we need more depth. Well, that is true but if we had a good QB, it would certainly make up for the lack of depth in our offense.

As for the defense, we lack depth at certain positions but as we`ve seen this year, it`s really not that bad overall as our defense without Berry has played good despite being on the field all the time.

When healthy and with a good QB this team would look really good. Of course if Houston doesn't keep progressing we will need more pass rush, as well as a NT of the future and a RT, but overall its looking pretty damn good with a QB.

With the money we have and draft, fixing the QB gives us a much clearer picture of what we need to fix. Not to mention how much better an offense looks with a good QB. With Cassel, we need the rest of our offense to be great. With a good QB, you don't need a top 3 oline and top 3 set of weapons, even though with a new RT, we look pretty good with both.

Even with Berry out, little pass rush outside of Hali, and only an aged Gregg, our D looks pretty damn good. Just having a solid O with that makes the D better with no other changes.

http://www.kansascity.com/2011/12/01...cks-since.html


After seeing this i hope there is a QB there.

**** this shit. If they think the QBOTF isn't going to be there you trade up. Not every team in front of us is going to be looking for a QB.

Even if thats the case, teams behind us will be. Whats more likely to happen....MIA or WAS trading up or us doing so? Unless we finish 2nd or 3rd in the draft there are multiple reasons why a QB won't be there for us.

The dog is my QB.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/MDaB9wj1rIQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

LMAO

The only reason there's no QB available to us is because we refuse to trade up. That's it.

That could very well be true. Do you doubt that we would refuse to trade up?

I'm clinging to the fact that since Pioli has been here there hasn't been a qb that he really likes so he hasn't drafted one high. This year is gonna be different.

I don't think its unreasonable to think that. Reality is in NE he never really had to look for a QB since they lucked into Brady. If you say alright Pioli believed in Cassel but isn't a complete moron, this would be the season he would have to take a QB.

I am still giving him the benifit of the doubt with the roster ect, this offseason is the line though. If he doesn't get a QB and address the other 3 spots we need I am going to offically give up. Hell, if he just gets a QB I will be fine with it. I just can't believe 100% he will get a QB because I can't take the heartbreak if I am expecting it to come.

What other 3 spots you thinking? RT, NT and ....

I pray that Pioli's expectations in the draft aren't too far from ours. I'd admire him if he moves up to get his QB and help me understand why he was one of the masterminds at NE. On the other hand, pure devastation if he doesn't. This is one of the biggest and exciting draft of finally landing our QBOTF and to really see if this organization wants to head anywhere.