![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If we were going the inexperienced coordinator route, he'd be my guy. I don't think we are though. |
I agree that 64 is old for a head coach in the NFL, but that's really only if you look at the number by itself and not the man. Romeo seems like a pretty sharp guy and he's probably in a lot better health than somebody like Charlie Weis.
Also, the long hours that these guys work aren't really work in the conventional sense. This job isn't exactly rocket science, it's just thinking about ways to improve the team and its performance. I'm not necessarily sold on Crennel, but his age isn't a real compelling argument against. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Jesus, you can't possible be this stupid? And you do realize there ARE some coaches like Tom Coughlin who is older? Oh and that being a head coach in COLLEGE can be just as challenging and yet who was the best coach in the game this year??? Yup a 72 year old. |
Quote:
That's it. Clearly we should follow this developing trend. |
Cut Romeo off of the fried chicken and grape soda. Then get his ass on a treadmill! Problem solved.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
then answer my question.. why are there no coaches with names that start with a D? THAT TREND MUST MEAN SOMETHING RIGHT???? I'm gonna try to force you to USE your brain for once... please explain why one "trend" is more meaningful then the other? Have you heard an NFL exec voice an opinion that 64 years old is the cutoff for an effective coach? Or is this just another thing you pulled out of your ass? (just to be clear, I'm not sold on Romeo yet but Clayton is an idiot, so I going to bury his idiotic ramblings in this thread) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.