![]() |
There is no scenario where not taking a QB at #1 would be justifiable.
If you stick with the 3-4.....you've got Hali and Houston....no Jarvis Jones. Poe is your NT....no Star. ILBs and CBs don't go #1 overall. If you re-sign Albert.....no OT. If you don't re-sign Albert...you drafted Donald Stephenson last year.....****ing play him. |
Quote:
If we take a QB in the first, and he turns out to be a bust... :shrug: Draft another one. |
To me with Andy Reid right now, I think Barkley is going to be the target.
|
Quote:
However, if they are able to trade down 5-6 spots without jeopardizing choosing one of the three top prospects...I could see them doing that. On the other hand if they are not going to be availble, if there was ever a year Chief's fans will forgive the FO on a "reach" for a QB--this would be it. Either way...our first round pick will most likely be a QB. Unless they are dead certain that "their" guy will be there when we pick in the second... :spock: :( |
Clark has never taken a QB in the 1st and he won't this year either.
Too risky... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think they take a QB because it gives him something singular to galvanize the fanbase. Don't think he didn't notice that there were more Joe Montana and Trent Green (and even ELVIS GRBAC) jerseys in the stadium vs. Matt Cassel jerseys. |
Quote:
In what ways is Barkley better than Smith? |
Quote:
:# http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-conte...ulking-out.gif |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'd still rather have Smith. I'd be good with Smith, Wilson, or Barkley. In that order. |
Quote:
Of course unless they get a king's ransom in return. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.