ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Fantasy Football Russel Wilson and Friends agree to deal. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=293658)

Rausch 08-01-2015 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 11631448)
I didn't specify, so apparently that makes me even dumber. You know, because every QB contract isn't an extension or anything.

Slow your ****ing roll egor, I'm honestly asking. Was he a FA this offseason?...

Eleazar 08-01-2015 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 11631440)
And this is not an extension, right? This is a new deal?

he didn't, he got 5/88 with 60.

Hootie 08-01-2015 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 11631453)
Slow your ****ing roll egor, I'm honestly asking. Was he a FA this offseason?...

This was the final year of his rookie deal

Rausch 08-01-2015 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 11631459)
This was the final year of his rookie deal

Based on this I'd guess it's a 2 year deal asking him to "prove it" that the team can opt out of in year 3.

Just me guessing.

Rausch 08-01-2015 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 11631457)
he didn't, he got 5/88 with 60.

Are the years and guaranteed money correct here?...

Saul Good 08-01-2015 09:59 AM

There is nobody in the world who would have taken a comment about a new contract to have included the last year of the current deal. Anyone pretending otherwise is flat out lying. The new contract/extension/whatever talk was 100% in reference to additional years and additional money beyond the current contract. He got four additional years. He's getting 88 million additional dollars. That's $22,000,000 per year for four years. Hootie guessed $22,000,000 per year for five years. If anything, that would have been a better deal for Seattle because adding a fifth year to the contract would have been the most expensive year and likely would have made the extension more like 5/$115,000,000.

Saul Good 08-01-2015 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 11631466)
Are the years and guaranteed money correct here?...

No. The extension was 4/88.

Shaid 08-01-2015 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 11629282)
Pretty much everyone here thought Berry was done. I have tried to explain that he didn't have the same thing an elderly relative you may have saw struggle with cancer had, that Berry's was very treatable, but no one seemed to take notice. (I'm surprised he is back in pads this year vs next year but I thought he would be back) Dane's view was shared by almost everyone here, he wasn't sticking his neck out to be dumb.

Yeah, not really. I was pretty sure he'd be back but I didn't expect this year. I am not sure that he's needed(at his contract level) with how the rest of the D has been playing but perhaps they can start to use him in smarter ways going forward. He does shoot run gaps nicely which was very much missing last year. Same with DJ.

O.city 08-01-2015 10:02 AM

Here you guys go, lacanfora broke it all down.


http://mweb.cbssports.com/nfl/writer...n-year-by-year

Brock 08-01-2015 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11631474)
There is nobody in the world who would have taken a comment about a new contract to have included the last year of the current deal. Anyone pretending otherwise is flat out lying. The new contract/extension/whatever talk was 100% in reference to additional years and additional money beyond the current contract. He got four additional years. He's getting 88 million additional dollars. That's $22,000,000 per year for four years. Hootie guessed $22,000,000 per year for five years. If anything, that would have been a better deal for Seattle because adding a fifth year to the contract would have been the most expensive year and likely would have made the extension more like 5/$115,000,000.

Yep. People are just trying to spin it.

Rausch 08-01-2015 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11631480)
Here you guys go, lacanfora broke it all down.


http://mweb.cbssports.com/nfl/writer...n-year-by-year

Quote:

With the cap soaring and with quarterback salaries on the rise, these sides could easily be back at the bargaining table by 2017.
Called it.

It's a "prove it or lose it" deal...

Rausch 08-01-2015 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 11631484)
Yep. People are just trying to spin it.

So this is just another "close, but not EXACTLY spot on" ripping of a contract prediction?

Feh...

Saul Good 08-01-2015 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 11631492)
So this is just another "close, but not EXACTLY spot on" ripping of a contract prediction?

Feh...

...by people who predicted Wilson would be traded or not re-signed, no less.

Rausch 08-01-2015 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11631541)
...by people who predicted Wilson would be traded or not re-signed, no less.

I could see a trade if it happened before the draft...

Hootie 08-01-2015 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 11631487)
Called it.

It's a "prove it or lose it" deal...

:spock:

he got $60M guaranteed

so if Russell flat out falls on his dick, he'll get $60M no matter what. He got $31M just to sign his name.

This isn't a "prove it or lose it" deal. It's a massive deal. $60M guaranteed. Rodgers got $53M on his extension. (Note, extension. Apparently you have to mention it as an extension otherwise you're a moron).

What they mean is ... by 2017 or 2018, if Russell develops the way they think he will with this contract (into a top 2, top 3 NFL QB), they'll have to extend him, again, with a hoard of new money, again, before the 2018 season.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.