ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Alex Smith was not the problem Sunday, sorry haters. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=303901)

Lex Luthor 11-21-2016 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12569184)
Smith: QBR 94.1, QB rating 99, PFF 71.9
Winston: QBR 83.6, QB rating 97, PFF 50.7

http://i.onionstatic.com/avclub/5809...iginal/304.jpg

Sandy Vagina 11-21-2016 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inmem58 (Post 12569238)
Only an Alex Smith fan would says it's irrelevant.

omg this guy's dumb as ****. ^ Okay.. we're done here. ROFL

#napsrawesome

TigeRRUppeRRcut 11-21-2016 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lex Luthor (Post 12569239)
I've always liked Alex Smith, but I'm going to have to side with the Smith critics on this one. Smith may not have been THE problem, but he sure as hell had a chance to be part of the solution, and he blew it with the pick in the end zone.

This goes back to the argument people make about Smith not being able to step up and carry the team in crucial situations. He failed at that yesterday.

Which side were you on when the team was 1-5 in 2015?

Just curious.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 11-21-2016 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 12569244)
omg this guy's dumb as ****. ^ Okay.. we're done here. ROFL

#napsrawesome

Inmem is on track to be the 10th person to be on my ignore list. But the beating he gets from Dane is too good not to read.

pugsnotdrugs19 11-21-2016 11:03 AM

tweeted minutes ago..

"Watch....learn...correct.....on to the next. #denverweek #ChiefsKingdom" - Jeremy Maclin

Sounds like he'll be back.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 11-21-2016 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12569252)
tweeted minutes ago..

"Watch....learn...correct.....on to the next. #denverweek #ChiefsKingdom" - Jeremy Maclin

Sounds like he'll be back.

https://media.giphy.com/media/rl0FOxdz7CcxO/giphy.gif

The Franchise 11-21-2016 11:04 AM

What will the excuses be when the offense doesn't improve with Maclin back?

Offensive line sucks?
Playcalling?
Defense not giving the offense enough TOP?

CoMoChief 11-21-2016 11:05 AM

When the defense held the bucs to fg's over and over...how did alex smith respond? He continued to stall drives and go 3nout.

Yes the defense couldnt get off the field. But giving up 19 pts at home to a very avg bucs team should put your team in a position to win. But alex smith has to play almost perfect mistake free football in order for him to be effective. He needs to run in order to be effective. He needs to get kelce the ball in order to be effective. When he does neither he becomes a liability.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 11-21-2016 11:05 AM

Thanks for driving up the traffic on CP today folks, I'm headed to the ER to save some folks from a visit with the grim reaper. Should be back by 10

The Franchise 11-21-2016 11:06 AM

You know who else takes blame in that time of position battle? The offense for not converting 3rd downs. The offense hung the defense out to dry on Sunday.

The Franchise 11-21-2016 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12569259)
Thanks for driving up the traffic on CP today folks, I'm headed to the ER to save some folks from a visit with the grim reaper. Should be back by 10

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/vdT2Wbr5Ons" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

TigeRRUppeRRcut 11-21-2016 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 12569257)
When the defense held the bucs to fg's over and over...how did alex smith respond? He continued to stall drives and go 3nout.

Yes the defense couldnt get off the field. But giving up 19 pts at home to a very avg bucs team should put your team in a position to win. But alex smith has to play almost perfect mistake free football in order for him to be effective. He needs to run in order to be effective. He needs to get kelce the ball in order to be effective. When he does neither he becomes a liability.

You understand the 2 TD's our offense scored happened in 4 minutes or less?

And that rather than giving up FG's we could've held them to zero but the defense gave up 50+ yards on each drive that led to those field goals?

Facts. Not fiction.

Beef Supreme 11-21-2016 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12569165)
"The Defense. Who didn't show up and allowed Winston/Martin to hold the ball for 35 minutes, earn 24 first downs, and convert 68% of 3rd downs. "


Read thru the whole thing next time buddy.

The Chiefs had the ball 9 times. The Bucs had the ball 8 times. While the Bucs did have long drives where our defense couldn't get off the field, the Chiefs had more opportunities to do the same to them. Didn't.

Bowser 11-21-2016 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12569264)
You understand the 2 TD's our offense scored happened in 4 minutes or less?

And that rather than giving up FG's we could've held them to zero but the defense gave up 50+ yards on each drive that led to those field goals?

Facts. Not fiction.

The Bucs were playing prevent. The Bucs have one of the worst defenses in football. Alex didn't have it in him to pull it off.

Facts. Not fiction.

Bowser 11-21-2016 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12569262)
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/vdT2Wbr5Ons" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

LMAO LMAO


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.