Originally Posted by Eleazar (Post 14272691)

I don't understand why CP is so triggered about the idea of losing Hill. This team is a Super Bowl favorite even if they cut Hill today.

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14272869)

Oh go **** yourself.

You’re such a contrarian pillowbitergot that you continue to play both sides of the fence. It’s such a polarizing topic that you don’t know which side to be on.

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 14272909)

So because I think those labels being used unironically is funny and cringey, I'm a contrarian and don't know what side to he in?

Lol ok.

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14272918)

This is your schtick. Find a group of people saying one thing and be a contrarian. There’s a reason multiple people have referred to you as a contrarian, just like there’s a reason these kinds of people get labeled SJW’s.

If the shoe fits, wear it.

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 14272722)

This is a total hit piece. It's even WORSE than the Star's clickbait.

Digging up 30-year old dirt to try and paint the Chiefs as some sort of haven for domestic abusers?

Extending that "reveal" to people who have nothing to do with the football program?

It's total schlock.

I hope we win the Super Bowl by 80 points, Tyreek Hill wins MVP, and pulls out a newspaper and wipes his ass with it.

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 14272925)

Can you tell me how I'm being a contrarian on the particular subject? Thanks

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14272933)

You pretend like you don’t know why we’re choosing to call them SJW’s, though you agree with pretty much everything else.

Are you unaware that some people legitimately fit this label?

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14272933)

You pretend like you don’t know why we’re choosing to call them SJW