ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Earl Thomas a longshot to be a Chief (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=317638)

Mecca 09-24-2018 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 13759257)
Nope.

They're a borderline AFC Champ contender right now.

And they aren't about to get Berry back. Until he starts practicing AT ALL, he's not coming back.

Team's aren't built on HOPE.

There is certainly still a lot of that Chiefs loser mentality going on here...the HOPE of that 1st rounder is better than guaranteed goods on a team that has a shot.

htismaqe 09-24-2018 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13759248)
Way to much valuing of low 1st round picks here, you think Earl Thomas won't be as productive for the next 5 years as Dee Ford has been? And he's one of the Chiefs better defensive picks.

Absolutely.

O.city 09-24-2018 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13759255)
Well he plays the same game Ed Reed did, he was productive well into his 30's.

Ok

htismaqe 09-24-2018 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13759260)
Sound thinking.

50 years, no Super Bowls.

Absolutely sound thinking.

Mecca 09-24-2018 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKchiefs (Post 13759262)
Hey, let's just trade all our draft picks then. We already know they're all going to suck. Just trade for established veterans. Oh, and that thing called a salary cap? I'm sure we'll have no problem fitting even more bloated contracts.

How long is this window going to be open? If you don't strike when you can do something you will sit there with your dick in your hand.

O.city 09-24-2018 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 13759269)
50 years, no Super Bowls.

Absolutely sound thinking.

Touche

O.city 09-24-2018 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13759270)
How long is this window going to be open? If you don't strike when you can do something you will sit there with your dick in your hand.

How's that worked out for Seattle?

htismaqe 09-24-2018 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKchiefs (Post 13759262)
Hey, let's just trade all our draft picks then. We already know they're all going to suck. Just trade for established veterans.

https://vivalavidro.files.wordpress....9acefb6d56.gif

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKchiefs (Post 13759262)
Oh, and that thing called a salary cap? I'm sure we'll have no problem fitting even more bloated contracts.

Good teams find ways to make the cap work ALL THE TIME. It's nothing but an excuse here.

Because Chiefs.

Mecca 09-24-2018 02:05 PM

Some teams are good at evaluating certain positions...Green Bay can't draft a RB for shit, the Steelers are great with WRs. This team has been good at offensive talent in general..

What makes you think they can evaluate defensive talent? What pick tells you they know what they are doing? This team is full of 2nd and 3rd rounders who suck or don't even play.

htismaqe 09-24-2018 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13759272)
How's that worked out for Seattle?

https://weavestream.files.wordpress....champions_.jpg

Mecca 09-24-2018 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13759272)
How's that worked out for Seattle?

You give me a Super Bowl title and another appearance...that's more than I've seen in my 37 years of life so a **** ton more than this team has.

htismaqe 09-24-2018 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13759278)
You give me a Super Bowl title and another appearance...that's more than I've seen in my 37 years of life so a **** ton more than this team has.

:clap:

pugsnotdrugs19 09-24-2018 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13759272)
How's that worked out for Seattle?

To be fair, Seattle hasn’t drafted for shit in the past few years. That team was built from 2010-2012 in terms of drafting.

O.city 09-24-2018 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 13759277)

I've waited my entire life for it, so if it wins a SB go for it.

But I'd prefer to see a Pats like dynasty if we are being wishful.

Mecca 09-24-2018 02:07 PM

Also I don't think Seattle planned for Kam Chancellor and Cliff Avril to have career ending injuries either, you know shit happens so they got their bowl before that happened.

O.city 09-24-2018 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13759280)
To be fair, Seattle hasn’t drafted for shit in the past few years. That team was built from 2010-2012 in terms of drafting.

Yeah, from drafting.

Once they started throwing picks at players later, it went to shit.

Mecca 09-24-2018 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13759281)
I've waited my entire life for it, so if it wins a SB go for it.

But I'd prefer to see a Pats like dynasty if we are being wishful.

Don't you think it's a little insane when the team hasn't been to a bowl in 50 years and some people are thinking about being a Pats dynasty more than making it to 1?

htismaqe 09-24-2018 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13759281)
I've waited my entire life for it, so if it wins a SB go for it.

But I'd prefer to see a Pats like dynasty if we are being wishful.

We've won ONE playoff game - ONE - since I was in college. My oldest child is getting ready to go to freaking college.

The "dynasty" talk needs to stop. It's absolutely silly.

Yes, Patrick Mahomes could be the cornerstone of a dynasty.

But this year is special, even by Tom Brady/Peyton Manning standards. If you're not going to go all in this year to win it all, might as well not even try. That's chickencaca thinking.

pugsnotdrugs19 09-24-2018 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13759284)
Yeah, from drafting.

Once they started throwing picks at players later, it went to shit.

Not my point.

The picks that they did have, especially early, sucked ass. Not even average contributors in many spots.

They put the icing on the cake in FA the year they won it all.

O.city 09-24-2018 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13759286)
Don't you think it's a little insane when the team hasn't been to a bowl in 50 years and some people are thinking about being a Pats dynasty more than making it to 1?

We haven't been past the divisional round of the playoffs in damn near 30 years and you guys are ready to go all in on a SB this year.

htismaqe 09-24-2018 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13759284)
Yeah, from drafting.

Once they started throwing picks at players later, it went to shit.

The core of our team - the offense - was built through the draft. Free agency/trades should be used to finish off that last little bit, which is exactly what Earl Thomas would be.

O.city 09-24-2018 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 13759288)
We've won ONE playoff game - ONE - since I was in college. My oldest child is getting ready to go to freaking college.

The "dynasty" talk needs to stop. It's absolutely silly.

Yes, Patrick Mahomes could be the cornerstone of a dynasty.

But this year is special, even by Tom Brady/Peyton Manning standards. If you're not going to go all in this year to win it all, might as well not even try. That's chickencaca thinking.

It's just the randomness of it. I'm all about giving myself as many chances to win as I can.

Mecca 09-24-2018 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13759290)
We haven't been past the divisional round of the playoffs in damn near 30 years and you guys are ready to go all in on a SB this year.

Yea cause the conference is wide open right now, do you realize having 1 playmaker on this defense may be the difference in winning in the playoffs?

If that middle isn't wide open that's a huge thing.

htismaqe 09-24-2018 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13759290)
We haven't been past the divisional round of the playoffs in damn near 30 years and you guys are ready to go all in on a SB this year.

And you want to avoid going all in because it might prevent them from being a "dynasty".

Seriously man, think about what you are saying.

RunKC 09-24-2018 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 13759288)
We've won ONE playoff game - ONE - since I was in college. My oldest child is getting ready to go to freaking college.

The "dynasty" talk needs to stop. It's absolutely silly.

Yes, Patrick Mahomes could be the cornerstone of a dynasty.

But this year is special, even by Tom Brady/Peyton Manning standards. If you're not going to go all in this year to win it all, might as well not even try. That's chickencaca thinking.

Well I will say Veach was hired for his scouting prowess. At least we’d have 2 2nd rd picks next year.

Hopefully in this scenario Justin Houston takes a paycut.

htismaqe 09-24-2018 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13759294)
It's just the randomness of it. I'm all about giving myself as many chances to win as I can.

Like I said last night:

When you're up $50 on the nickel slots, you freaking cash out and go somewhere else.

The guys that sit at the slot machine and put in more nickels don't end up with more money, they end up BROKE.

Mecca 09-24-2018 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13759297)
Well I will say Veach was hired for his scouting prowess. At least we’d have 2 2nd rd picks next year.

Hopefully in this scenario Justin Houston takes a paycut.

We need some more fat ass OLB's that run like they are stuck in the sand.

O.city 09-24-2018 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 13759296)
And you want to avoid going all in because it might prevent them from being a "dynasty".

Seriously man, think about what you are saying.

When has going all in ever worked though in this sense?

I don't have a problem trading for someone. But I'm not giving up a high pick and a big new contract to do it.

MIAdragon 09-24-2018 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 13759296)
And you want to avoid going all in because it might prevent them from being a "dynasty".

Seriously man, think about what you are saying.

I’d mortgage the future for a substantial increase in SB probability.

htismaqe 09-24-2018 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13759300)
When has going all in ever worked though in this sense?

I don't have a problem trading for someone. But I'm not giving up a high pick and a big new contract to do it.

When has stockpiling picks and playing for next year ever worked for the Chiefs?

RunKC 09-24-2018 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13759299)
We need some more fat ass OLB's that run like they are stuck in the sand.

Did you see our pass rush last year?

Giving up a 1st for Earl Thomas will look silly when we let Ford walk, have no real resource to replace him and watch QB’s have all day to destroy our all-pro safeties.

htismaqe 09-24-2018 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIAdragon (Post 13759303)
I’d mortgage the future for a substantial increase in SB probability.

Yep, me too.

Mecca 09-24-2018 02:14 PM

How much of the future are you even mortgaging? You are trading a pick for a DB..you're likely drafting at least one if not 2 DB's...Thomas is proven and this team has 18 million of dead money coming off after this year a long with several big money contracts.

Why does it matter if they trade for Thomas or sign a FA other than Thomas can help right ****ing now when we are a contender.

OKchiefs 09-24-2018 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13759270)
How long is this window going to be open? If you don't strike when you can do something you will sit there with your dick in your hand.

I have no problem capitalizing on our opportunity, but there's a limit. I absolutely would not give up our first round pick for a 29 year old expensive safety that would require a new contract. I also don't understand this defeatist attitude about our ability to draft defensive talent. I agree we haven't been great, but that doesn't mean you give up. If anyone really thinks that Veach is incapable of improving at finding defensive talent then he absolutely has to go. Either you trust the guy to find talent in the draft and continue to build the team or you don't. Over paying on trades isn't the answer.

jaa1025 09-24-2018 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13759219)
If Seattle is asking for that many picks, he isn't getting traded. No one is trading higher than a 3, maybe a 2 (doubt it).

He's 29 and he needs a new contract.

They most likely get a conditional 3rd for him even if they just let him walk next year. Plus, they could tag and trade him as well.

It will take a 2nd+ to get him.

Mecca 09-24-2018 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13759309)
Did you see our pass rush last year?

Giving up a 1st for Earl Thomas will look silly when QB’s have all day to destroy our all-pro safeties.

Yea this front office sucks ass at picking pass rushers.

Dee Ford, Kpass, Breeland Speaks

that's a 1,2,2 I will bet anything you wanna bet Earl Thomas is more productive for the rest of his career than all 3 of them are combined.

htismaqe 09-24-2018 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13759309)
Did you see our pass rush last year?

Giving up a 1st for Earl Thomas will look silly when QB’s have all day to destroy our all-pro safeties.

QBs already have all day.

And still the reason they are getting carved up is because our safeties are constantly out of position.

Earl Thomas fixes THE huge gaping hole in this defense and it's not even close.

Plus, if they need pass rush so bad, why would you trust them to draft it? Speaks and KPass aren't doing squat. Great picks.

Sassy Squatch 09-24-2018 02:16 PM

Damn. A lot of angst over a throwaway tweet by Mortenson and Reid denying interest today. It's just meh unless it comes out that we are in fact working on a trade. Guess I just don't see Thomas in the same way some of you guys do.

htismaqe 09-24-2018 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13759311)
How much of the future are you even mortgaging? You are trading a pick for a DB..you're likely drafting at least one if not 2 DB's...Thomas is proven and this team has 18 million of dead money coming off after this year a long with several big money contracts.

Why does it matter if they trade for Thomas or sign a FA other than Thomas can help right ****ing now when we are a contender.

The whole future, of course. The team will fall apart if they don't have those extra draft picks.

And you know, Clark is cheap but please don't spend his money!

htismaqe 09-24-2018 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKchiefs (Post 13759314)
I have no problem capitalizing on our opportunity, but there's a limit. I absolutely would not give up our first round pick for a 29 year old expensive safety that would require a new contract. I also don't understand this defeatist attitude about our ability to draft defensive talent. I agree we haven't been great, but that doesn't mean you give up. If anyone really thinks that Veach is incapable of improving at finding defensive talent then he absolutely has to go. Either you trust the guy to find talent in the draft and continue to build the team or you don't. Over paying on trades isn't the answer.

NOBODY is suggesting they give up.

It's ONE pick. :facepalm:

htismaqe 09-24-2018 02:18 PM

I gotta log off.

30 years to get our franchise QB, he's playing like no other QB ever has in the history of football, and "there's always next year".

This place! ROFL

MIAdragon 09-24-2018 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13759311)
How much of the future are you even mortgaging? You are trading a pick for a DB..you're likely drafting at least one if not 2 DB's...Thomas is proven and this team has 18 million of dead money coming off after this year a long with several big money contracts.

Why does it matter if they trade for Thomas or sign a FA other than Thomas can help right ****ing now when we are a contender.

I’m in total agreeance. It’s a need, one that we could utilize right now and the cost to acquire isn’t absorbent. This should have been done yesterday.

The Franchise 09-24-2018 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13759309)
Did you see our pass rush last year?

Giving up a 1st for Earl Thomas will look silly when we let Ford walk, have no real resource to replace him and watch QB’s have all day to destroy our all-pro safeties.

Because we only have our 1st round pick next year? We don't have any picks after that?

MIAdragon 09-24-2018 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 13759326)
I gotta log off.

30 years to get our franchise QB, he's playing like no other QB ever has in the history of football, and "there's always next year".

This place! ROFL

It’s only a few, not everyone is a tiger.

Eleazar 09-24-2018 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 13759308)
When has stockpiling picks and playing for next year ever worked for the Chiefs?

I don't understand this. Pioli and Carl and Herm and Marty and whomever else are not haunting the franchise. Why does everyone think that we can't build a sustainable, long term contender because we're the Chiefs?

If teams like Pittsburgh and New England and Green Bay etc., can do it after they find their franchise QB, then we can do it too.

ChiefaRoo 09-24-2018 02:22 PM

TRADE FOR THE SAFETY AND GIVE HIM A NEW CONTRACT NOW!!

The Franchise 09-24-2018 02:22 PM

The Patriots built a dynasty because Brady takes his pay under the table.

O.city 09-24-2018 02:23 PM

I would rather have an all pro player in his prime over a pick for sure. I'm not sure how long Thomas will stay in his prime but if it would last the life of the contract, sure, lets do it.

The Franchise 09-24-2018 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13759343)
I would rather have an all pro player in his prime over a pick for sure. I'm not sure how long Thomas will stay in his prime but if it would last the life of the contract, sure, lets do it.

If it was guaranteed that you would get his prime for 3 years here....would you do it?

O.city 09-24-2018 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Pest (Post 13759347)
If it was guaranteed that you would get his prime for 3 years here....would you do it?

Yeah for sure.

htismaqe 09-24-2018 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eleazar (Post 13759336)
I don't understand this. Pioli and Carl and Herm and Marty and whomever else are not haunting the franchise. Why does everyone think that we can't build a sustainable, long term contender because we're the Chiefs?

If teams like Pittsburgh and New England and Green Bay etc., can do it after they find their franchise QB, then we can do it too.

We're talking about the defense.

What exactly has Reid and company done to convince you they're actually capable of fixing the defense through the draft?

Sassy Squatch 09-24-2018 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Pest (Post 13759347)
If it was guaranteed that you would get his prime for 3 years here....would you do it?

Of course. Seahawks have to agree to a trade, Thomas has to agree to a new contract, and we have to assume he plays at a high level into his thirties. Lots of moving parts there.

carcosa 09-24-2018 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by srvy (Post 13759251)
Well thats nice but Hunt foods has no relationship to the Hunts we know as owners of the Chiefs.

You sure???!?!?!

MIAdragon 09-24-2018 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 13759353)
Of course. Seahawks have to agree to a trade, Thomas has to agree to a new contract, and we have to assume he plays at a high level into his thirties. Lots of moving parts there.

Drafts bust every year, this is a known commodity. Trade the pick, pay the man his fair value. Sit back and enjoy the show.

philfree 09-24-2018 02:32 PM

I guess an important question would be , Is adding one player to our defense going to make enough of a difference? I'd give a 2nd and throw in some other pick but I wouldn't give a 1st or even two 2nds. If it doesn't work out then we didn't win it all and have less capital to rebuild this defense and to keep stocking the o line for our Franchise QB. With Mahomes were looking at a 15 year window so there's no need to make desperation moves.

Chiefnj2 09-24-2018 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13759300)
When has going all in ever worked though in this sense?

.

Was Denver all in when they acquired Manning?

Sassy Squatch 09-24-2018 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIAdragon (Post 13759359)
Drafts bust every year, this is a known commodity. Trade the pick, pay the man his fair value. Sit back and enjoy the show.

Seahawks could very well want more than a 1st rounder. They want to be "blown away", whatever that means.

The Franchise 09-24-2018 02:33 PM

He's already at $10 million a season....which puts him at #6 on the highest paid safeties. Offer him a 3 year extension. His cap hit would be $8.5 million for us this year. Offer him a mid level cap hit next season, a high cap hit in year 2 and a cap hit in year 3 that we can maybe get out of. Berry will be gone by year 2 of his extension anyways.

O.city 09-24-2018 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 13759367)
Was Denver all in when they acquired Manning?

Not really a similar situation, but ok.

Eleazar 09-24-2018 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 13759351)
We're talking about the defense.

What exactly has Reid and company done to convince you they're actually capable of fixing the defense through the draft?

If Reid, Veach et al can't draft well and Mahomes' career is going to be wasted playing for teams that don't have enough talent, then they should be replaced.

There's no reason why we can't succeed where the franchises that are the class of the league have done so. There's no reason why the Chiefs should not be one of the franchises that are the class of the league that are more or less a perennial contender. We have the elite QB now and we will have him for the next decade at least.

Why would we set our sights so low? Because people who've been gone for 20 or 30 years didn't get it done way back when?

Molitoth 09-24-2018 02:35 PM

The year is 2015 and some trade rumors for Zobrist and Cueto start circulating.....

"You can't trade Aaron Brookes, Sean Manaea, Brandon Finnegan, John Lamb, and Cody Reed! It will set the Royals back years!"


Haha... there you go htismaqe. ;)

RunKC 09-24-2018 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 13758993)
Just do what was working prior. Did just fine against the Steelers after they raped it in the 2nd quarter and we went back to what was working. Shit goes sideways and they get a quick score? Have faith in Mahomes. We aren't hamstrung by Smith anymore.

They blitzed and got burned badly

Mecca 09-24-2018 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eleazar (Post 13759336)
I don't understand this. Pioli and Carl and Herm and Marty and whomever else are not haunting the franchise. Why does everyone think that we can't build a sustainable, long term contender because we're the Chiefs?

If teams like Pittsburgh and New England and Green Bay etc., can do it after they find their franchise QB, then we can do it too.

Scott Pioli drafted the best defensive players on this team..think about that.

Eleazar 09-24-2018 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13759387)
Scott Pioli drafted the best defensive players on this team..think about that.

Why would I think about that? Scott Pioli is long gone and is irrelevant to the people in the front office and on the team today.

Mecca 09-24-2018 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eleazar (Post 13759394)
Why would I think about that? Scott Pioli is long gone and is irrelevant to the people in the front office and on the team today.

It's an example of how shit this team has been at drafting defensive talent.

htismaqe 09-24-2018 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 13759380)
The year is 2015 and some trade rumors for Zobrist and Cueto start circulating.....

"You can't trade Aaron Brookes, Sean Manaea, Brandon Finnegan, John Lamb, and Cody Reed! It will set the Royals back years!"


Haha... there you go htismaqe. ;)

ROFL

htismaqe 09-24-2018 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eleazar (Post 13759375)
If Reid, Veach et al can't draft well and Mahomes' career is going to be wasted playing for teams that don't have enough talent, then they should be replaced.

There's no reason why we can't succeed where the franchises that are the class of the league have done so. There's no reason why the Chiefs should not be one of the franchises that are the class of the league that are more or less a perennial contender. We have the elite QB now and we will have him for the next decade at least.

Why would we set our sights so low? Because people who've been gone for 20 or 30 years didn't get it done way back when?

What does any of that have to do with this year?

At this rate, they are well on their way to wasting one of the best years by a QB in the history of football.

Replacing Veach, drafting help, all of that crap doesn't help them now. And they should be doing EVERYTHING it takes to help them now.

htismaqe 09-24-2018 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 13759366)
I guess an important question would be , Is adding one player to our defense going to make enough of a difference? I'd give a 2nd and throw in some other pick but I wouldn't give a 1st or even two 2nds. If it doesn't work out then we didn't win it all and have less capital to rebuild this defense and to keep stocking the o line for our Franchise QB. With Mahomes were looking at a 15 year window so there's no need to make desperation moves.

Absolutely yes.

Replacing Eric Murray with Earl Thomas makes an instant contender to win it all.

The Franchise 09-24-2018 02:43 PM

Say that we trade our 1st for Thomas......we still have two ****ing 2nd round picks this year that they can use to trade up if there is a player that they really ****ing want. Yeah sure...you could keep your 1st round pick and end up with 3 starters from the first two rounds. Or you could end up with two projects and a bust. It's all a ****ing crapshoot.

We KNOW what Earl Thomas is.

Mecca 09-24-2018 02:43 PM

Veach better do something because his desire to ignore the secondary looks like the worst shit he could have ever done...oh and all of his front 7 moves, the 49ers were running the ball yesterday.

Mecca 09-24-2018 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Pest (Post 13759408)
Say that we trade our 1st for Thomas......we still have two ****ing 2nd round picks this year that they can use to trade up if there is a player that they really ****ing want. Yeah sure...you could keep your 1st round pick and end up with 3 starters from the first two rounds. Or you could end up with two projects and a bust. It's all a ****ing crapshoot.

We KNOW what Earl Thomas is.

That's a better scenario this team really needs some proven players that still perform and their peak level.

RunKC 09-24-2018 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13759409)
Veach better do something because his desire to ignore the secondary looks like the worst shit he could have ever done...oh and all of his front 7 moves, the 49ers were running the ball yesterday.

Not much you can do when the 2 safeties you were counting on are hurt.

Eric Murray is a clear example of why Dorsey is overrated around here.

htismaqe 09-24-2018 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13759409)
Veach better do something because his desire to ignore the secondary looks like the worst shit he could have ever done...oh and all of his front 7 moves, the 49ers were running the ball yesterday.

6.1ypc. :bolt:

htismaqe 09-24-2018 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13759415)
Not much you can do when the 2 safeties you were counting on are hurt.

Eric Murray is a clear example of why Dorsey is overrated around here.

They deserve at least partial blame for counting on people that were hurt in the first place.

Mecca 09-24-2018 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13759415)
Not much you can do when the 2 safeties you were counting on are hurt.

Eric Murray is a clear example of why Dorsey is overrated around here.

Eric Berry is a brokedick? You don't say? He's only missed a crap ton of games his whole career...and thinking Dan Sorenson is a good starter is funny.

Matter of fact Earl Thomas actually doesn't miss games...amazing.

Beef Supreme 09-24-2018 02:48 PM

I am also a longshot to be a Chief.

RunKC 09-24-2018 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13759409)
Veach better do something because his desire to ignore the secondary looks like the worst shit he could have ever done.

Yeah Fuller and Scandrick have been turrribbbbbllleeee!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Before yesterday&#39;s game, Chiefs CB Orlando Scandrick was rated #4 in CB success rate and #3 in yards per target among qualified CB&#39;s, per <a href="https://twitter.com/fboutsiders?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@fboutsiders</a>.<br><br>Kendall Fuller was #14 in success and #10 in yards per target.<br><br>San Francisco&#39;s WR&#39;s had 92 yards on 14 targets yesterday.</p>&mdash; Craig Stout (@barleyhop) <a href="https://twitter.com/barleyhop/status/1044228583005327360?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 24, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

O.city 09-24-2018 02:49 PM

Hell, I wish they'd have let them run the ball better earlier in the 2nd half. Had they done that a drive or two earlier we'd have won by 3 scores.

Molitoth 09-24-2018 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13759421)
Eric Berry is a brokedick? You don't say? He's only missed a crap ton of games his whole career...and thinking Dan Sorenson is a good starter is funny.

Matter of fact Earl Thomas actually doesn't miss games...amazing.

I wish we could trade Eric Berry for Earl Thomas straight up.

Mecca 09-24-2018 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13759423)
Yeah Fuller and Scandrick have been turrribbbbbllleeee!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Before yesterday&#39;s game, Chiefs CB Orlando Scandrick was rated #4 in CB success rate and #3 in yards per target among qualified CB&#39;s, per <a href="https://twitter.com/fboutsiders?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@fboutsiders</a>.<br><br>Kendall Fuller was #14 in success and #10 in yards per target.<br><br>San Francisco&#39;s WR&#39;s had 92 yards on 14 targets yesterday.</p>&mdash; Craig Stout (@barleyhop) <a href="https://twitter.com/barleyhop/status/1044228583005327360?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 24, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Actually Scandrick hasn't been that bad, Fuller is up and down....but those safeties are horrible hence why we are talking about Earl Thomas.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.