ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Royals *** Official 2016 Royals Offseason Repository *** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=295826)

Anyong Bluth 12-23-2015 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 11972808)
I don't think we're going to sign him either. I just kind of want to get it over with so it's done.

I think it's all on Dayton... no way he wants to be paying someone $20M per when they're 34, 35, 36. Moore CAN afford him, but he won't want to. It was either Mellinger or McCullough that wrote earlier that Royals scouts think he's already lost a step in the field. They've spent the whole offseason trying to soften the blow because it will be a major PR hit.


And that's okay, because he's not going to fully earn that contract in those extra years.
Bully to Alex if he can get it on the open market and likes the situation. I have little problem with the organization accounting for upcoming spending if that's the case.

Everyone would like him back, but the business side of things don't work out economically. Under a new TV deal, maybe?

Lex Luthor 12-23-2015 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 11972788)
I'm probably in the minority but as much as I like and have appreciated Gordon's play, I think it would be foolish to give him a 5/80+ contract.

He's had significant injuries the past two seasons and at his age, future injuries are likely.

Completely agree. If this team ties up that much money in Alex Gordon, we are out of the running when Hosmer, Moose, Cain, Escobar and Davis are all free agents after the 2017 season. We may wind up losing most of those guys anyway, but I'd like to at least have a shot at retaining them.

If Alex Gordon were 5 years younger or if the Royals were a big market team, keeping him would be an easy decision. But neither of those things are true.

Lex Luthor 12-23-2015 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anyong Bluth (Post 11972847)
Under a new TV deal, maybe?

Yep, it's too bad the current deal lasts until after the 2019 season.

From what I can tell with Google searches, it looks like Dayton Moore signed this contract in 2007. It's too bad he signed such a long-term contract. That was bad Dayton Moore: the guy who hired Trey Hillman and brought in guys like Yuniesky Betancourt and Jose Guillen.

The Dayton Moore we have now is a genius. The Dayton Moore from 2007? Not so much. I'm glad he figured it out.

tk13 12-23-2015 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lex Luthor (Post 11972858)
Completely agree. If this team ties up that much money in Alex Gordon, we are out of the running when Hosmer, Moose, Cain, Escobar and Davis are all free agents after the 2017 season. We may wind up losing most of those guys anyway, but I'd like to at least have a shot at retaining them.

If Alex Gordon were 5 years younger or if the Royals were a big market team, keeping him would be an easy decision. But neither of those things are true.

I would generally agree. Re-signing Hos will no doubt be tough... but if you're going to offer a $20+M a year contract... I'd rather give it to Hos. I feel pretty good about Cuthbert, so if Moose walks, he walks. If you could sign Esky, Cain and somehow get Hos... you could fill in the gaps with Mondesi, Cuthbert, maybe Starling or one of the other young OFs. You could still field a competitive team.

Plus waiting to sign any of those guys means you're working under a new TV contract (for part of the deal, at least).

duncan_idaho 12-23-2015 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 11972880)
I would generally agree. Re-signing Hos will no doubt be tough... but if you're going to offer a $20+M a year contract... I'd rather give it to Hos. I feel pretty good about Cuthbert, so if Moose walks, he walks. If you could sign Esky, Cain and somehow get Hos... you could fill in the gaps with Mondesi, Cuthbert, maybe Starling or one of the other young OFs. You could still field a competitive team.

Plus waiting to sign any of those guys means you're working under a new TV contract (for part of the deal, at least).


I have no interest in re-signing Escobar, and I doubt the team does, either, unless Mondesi collapses. Extending a speed and defense SS into his 30s seems like a bad prop, especially when you have a cheap internal replacement whose floor is the current guy's ceiling.

As such, I'd swap Moustakas and Escobar in your consideration. I also need to see Cain maintain the XBH power this season before I'm comfortable extending him (because his O is eventually going to have to carry him if you extend beyond current years of control).

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 11972788)
I'm probably in the minority but as much as I like and have appreciated Gordon's play, I think it would be foolish to give him a 5/80+ contract.

He's had significant injuries the past two seasons and at his age, future injuries are likely.


I'll give you the "significant injury" in 2015, but his wrist injury in 2014 can't be classified as such, IMO.

If you play a full season through an injury, it's not "significant."

Regardless, your point still has merits. From a financial/long-term perspective, Alex Gordon at $15 million/year for 5 years makes sense. At 90? Not so much.

Prison Bitch 12-23-2015 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 11972915)
I have no interest in re-signing Escobar, and I doubt the team does, either, unless Mondesi collapses. Extending a speed and defense SS into his 30s seems like a bad prop, especially when you have a cheap internal replacement whose floor is the current guy's ceiling. the

This. The aging curve for defense is even younger than hitting, peaking at 25 or 26. Escobar derives all his value from his glove and baserinning so at age 30 he will be in severe decline stage, most likely

srvy 12-23-2015 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 11972458)
I don't think Gallardo would qualify as a "bargain bin" acquisition. Kazmir is in pretty high demand.

I would look at a guy like Lincecum as a true bargain bin opportunity.

You have mentioned him before and I liked the idea a lot. If that guys arm isn't wrecked and would come cheap he could be a real gem in the junk heap. I would be all for this if Royals think there is still some life left.

Coach 12-23-2015 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 11972915)
I have no interest in re-signing Escobar, and I doubt the team does, either, unless Mondesi collapses. Extending a speed and defense SS into his 30s seems like a bad prop, especially when you have a cheap internal replacement whose floor is the current guy's ceiling.

Would you consider signing him to play 2nd base if that was an option? Granted, I know his speed will decline, but even with that, would he still be a viable average to above average 2B with the glove and not have to cover much range, compared to SS?

Plus, they can always have him bat at the 8-9 hole anyways.

duncan_idaho 12-23-2015 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach (Post 11973166)
Would you consider signing him to play 2nd base if that was an option? Granted, I know his speed will decline, but even with that, would he still be a viable average to above average 2B with the glove and not have to cover much range, compared to SS?

Plus, they can always have him bat at the 8-9 hole anyways.


No, not really. His value is so tied up in abilities that don't age well, I don't think even moving him to 2B would work unless he becomes a much better hitter all of a sudden.

Coach 12-23-2015 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 11973184)
No, not really. His value is so tied up in abilities that don't age well, I don't think even moving him to 2B would work unless he becomes a much better hitter all of a sudden.

That's reasonable, and I can agree with that. I just wasn't sure if it would be a cheaper option to go that route instead of finding an Omar Infante (overpaying a 2B with horrific production).

That being said, does KC even have a 2B of the future in the minors somewhere, or someone that can translate well into that position offensively and defensively?

tk13 12-23-2015 08:08 PM

I was thinking 2B too, I certainly wouldn't let him block Mondesi. But, he'll be miles cheaper than Moose. I have no problem signing Moose and letting Escobar walk. I know how much Dayton values defense up the middle of the field though. I don't think Escobar has to be a subpar 2B in his 30's. Lots of guys have done it.

Lex Luthor 12-23-2015 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach (Post 11973210)
That's reasonable, and I can agree with that. I just wasn't sure if it would be a cheaper option to go that route instead of finding an Omar Infante (overpaying a 2B with horrific production).

That being said, does KC even have a 2B of the future in the minors somewhere, or someone that can translate well into that position offensively and defensively?

I'd like to see them give Christian Colon a shot.

KChiefs1 12-23-2015 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 11972458)
I don't think Gallardo would qualify as a "bargain bin" acquisition. Kazmir is in pretty high demand.



I would look at a guy like Lincecum as a true bargain bin opportunity.


Lincecum is a Moore kinda signing.

KChiefs1 12-23-2015 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anyong Bluth (Post 11972847)
Under a new TV deal, maybe?


That TV contract is going to haunt them.

Anyong Bluth 12-23-2015 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 11972915)
I have no interest in re-signing Escobar, and I doubt the team does, either, unless Mondesi collapses. Extending a speed and defense SS into his 30s seems like a bad prop, especially when you have a cheap internal replacement whose floor is the current guy's ceiling.

As such, I'd swap Moustakas and Escobar in your consideration. I also need to see Cain maintain the XBH power this season before I'm comfortable extending him (because his O is eventually going to have to carry him if you extend beyond current years of control).




I'll give you the "significant injury" in 2015, but his wrist injury in 2014 can't be classified as such, IMO.

If you play a full season through an injury, it's not "significant."

Regardless, your point still has merits. From a financial/long-term perspective, Alex Gordon at $15 million/year for 5 years makes sense. At 90? Not so much.

Took the words right out of my mouth.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.