ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs A dash of Curry solidifies Chiefs defense. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=203480)

htismaqe 03-02-2009 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bdeg (Post 5546861)
Brian Johnston might shine.

I don't think Flowers will be hurt as much as people think.

I'm not suggesting he's gonna be hurt by it.

I'm just saying that in an ideal world, he's not perfect for a pressure defense.

bdeg 03-02-2009 01:14 PM

All good points. It sucks that none of our safeties are fast enough for it. I couldn't find Morgan's 40, but he wasn't projected as a fs either.

MOhillbilly 03-02-2009 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5547305)
I'd rather play bump and run with the SS at the line and the FS playing Cover 1.

soft zone with young DBs will give em a chance to get there head turned, less chance of BS calls.

htismaqe 03-02-2009 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MOhillbilly (Post 5547948)
soft zone with young DBs will give em a chance to get there head turned, less chance of BS calls.

Absolutely.

I'm just saying that my ideal scenario would be that we don't have to compensate inside the scheme. But we're going to be doing it for a while so we might as well get used to it. They're going to be turning over personnel on defense for a couple of years if they're intent on going pure 3-4.

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-02-2009 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5547305)
I'd rather play bump and run with the SS at the line and the FS playing Cover 1.

This!

MOhillbilly 03-02-2009 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5547965)
Absolutely.

I'm just saying that my ideal scenario would be that we don't have to compensate inside the scheme. But we're going to be doing it for a while so we might as well get used to it. They're going to be turning over personnel on defense for a couple of years if they're intent on going pure 3-4.

Safties are the key. we will have to see what the new staff can do with page and pollard. i got the feeling that there was alot of confusion on the field when it came to safety play either do to flat out poor player performance, poor coaching or a combination of both.
To be honest i feel that Gunther had alot to do with ****in up our young players the past couple years.

edit- you can get away with alot at the line with good safety play.

Delano 03-02-2009 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bdeg (Post 5547460)
All good points. It sucks that none of our safeties are fast enough for it. I couldn't find Morgan's 40, but he wasn't projected as a fs either.

FWIW he ran a 4.52 at the combine.

htismaqe 03-02-2009 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MOhillbilly (Post 5547979)
Safties are the key. we will have to see what the new staff can do with page and pollard. i got the feeling that there was alot of confusion on the field when it came to safety play either do to flat out poor player performance, poor coaching or a combination of both.
To be honest i feel that Gunther had alot to do with ****in up our young players the past couple years.

edit- you can get away with alot at the line with good safety play.

I know Pollard takes alot of heat here, but I've watched both of them intently and I can say without a doubt that Page is a HUGE problem. Many of the plays attributed to Pollard were actually Pollard trying to cover for the fact that Page was ANYWHERE NEAR where he was supposed to be.

For somebody who is supposed to be a zone cover FS, Page just isn't very smart. Combine that with his lack of high-end physical skills and you end up with a disaster waiting to happen.

htismaqe 03-02-2009 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Delano (Post 5547984)
FWIW he ran a 4.52 at the combine.

That's fast enough, IF the guy has good instincts and recognition skills.

I'd be more interested to know how he did in the drills that demonstrate the ability to change directions and close gaps quickly.

bdeg 03-02-2009 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5548002)
That's fast enough, IF the guy has good instincts and recognition skills.

I'd be more interested to know how he did in the drills that demonstrate the ability to change directions and close gaps quickly.

I found combine results for that year but for some reason he wasn't on it. All I remember was that he performed well enough to make most believe he was a possible 1st. I read one report that said he would eventually be better than Kenny Phillips. I can't imagine they would have written that if he didn't stand out or at least have good times.

'Hamas' Jenkins 03-02-2009 03:01 PM

The nice thing about DaJuan Morgan is that he has the physical ability to play either safety spot. He's fast enough, and has a lot of natural explosion.

MOhillbilly 03-02-2009 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5548067)
The nice thing about DaJuan Morgan is that he has the physical ability to play either safety spot. He's fast enough, and has a lot of natural explosion.

when is he projected to go?

RUSH 03-02-2009 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MOhillbilly (Post 5548084)
when is he projected to go?

lol he's on our team

MOhillbilly 03-02-2009 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RUSH (Post 5548128)
lol he's on our team

why doesnt he play then?

MOhillbilly 03-02-2009 03:29 PM

http://weblogs.newsday.com/sports/wa...blog/dunce.gif


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.