ChiefsPlanet
Page 13 of 14 « First 39101112 13 14
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs awarded compensatory picks 3rd and 6th round (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=271282)

Ugly Duck 03-18-2013 11:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 9511862)

Here is full list chiefs got 96 and 204
Figures.... Chiefs get awarded #204 and Oakland gets #205. And the Raider war room was all set to pick Geno Smith in the 6th round.... now KC will get him!

Bewbies 03-18-2013 11:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ugly Duck (Post 9512803)
Figures.... Chiefs get awarded #204 and Oakland gets #205. And the Raider war room was all set to pick Geno Smith in the 6th round.... now KC will get him!
No. In the 6th round Oakland is targeting a cricket player from Pakistan that just outran a camel.

BigCatDaddy 03-19-2013 06:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Messier (Post 9512062)
I think Flacco is middle of the pack.
You don't give a middle of the pack QB 20 mil/season.

Messier 03-19-2013 07:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 9513022)
You don't give a middle of the pack QB 20 mil/season.
Sure you do. If you're middle of the pack QB had an amazing post season and won the SB.

Middle of the pack is not an insult, they are good QBs

BigCatDaddy 03-19-2013 07:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Messier (Post 9513027)
Sure you do. If you're middle of the pack QB had an amazing post season and won the SB.

Middle of the pack is not an insult, they are good QBs
No, you don't. Like Hamas mentioned many people are confusing fantasy football numbers with real world value. Flacco is a top 10QB and Smith if likely bottom 10.

Messier 03-19-2013 07:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 9513031)
No, you don't. Lilke Hamas mentioned many people are confusing fantasy football numbers with real world value.
I'm not. Believe me, no one knows the NFL isn't about stats than me. This isn't baseball. Is Flacco the same QB that before the 2012 season was most likely going to be a FA, and people were Luke warm on? Is he a new QB? Maybe. If so, we know you can up your game in the middle of your career.

Lzen 03-19-2013 07:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9511927)
YOU HAVE NO WAY OF NOT KNOWING THIS
You like to dress up in a tutu and pretend you're a ballerina.

I have no way of not knowing this so it much be true.

Lzen 03-19-2013 07:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by philfree (Post 9511890)
So we have #1, #63, #97 and #100.
Wouldn't that be #1, #65, #97, and #100?

BigCatDaddy 03-19-2013 07:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Messier (Post 9513036)
I'm not. Believe me, no one knows the NFL isn't about stats than me. This isn't baseball. Is Flacco the same QB that before the 2012 season was most likely going to be a FA, and people were Luke warm on? Is he a new QB? Maybe. If so, we know you can up your game in the middle of your career.
He's the same QB he has been the last 4 years, but the last two he has been money in the playoffs. A Flacco year is 3800 yards around, 23 TD's, and 90 passer rating on a team built around ball control. When asked to do more in the playoffs he has shown he can. The combination of numbers, winning, and the eye test make it obvious he is top 10. Top 5, probably not quite yet.

Mother****erJones 03-19-2013 07:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lzen (Post 9513042)
Wouldn't that be #1, #65, #97, and #100?
No we got 1, 63, 96 4th rd, 5th rd, 204, 6th and 7th

Messier 03-19-2013 07:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 9513052)
He's the same QB he has been the last 4 years, but the last two he has been money in the playoffs. A Flacco year is 3800 yards around, 23 TD's, and 90 passer rating on a team built around ball control. When asked to do more in the playoffs he has shown he can. The combination of numbers, winning, and the eye test make it obvious he is top 10. Top 5, probably not quite yet.
That's fine. You have him top ten I have him outside the top ten. He's a QB that needs things working around him, he can make a play here or there to win a game. I just have him rated lower than you. He's really good, most of the top 15 to 20 QBs are really good.

philfree 03-19-2013 07:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lzen (Post 9513042)
Wouldn't that be #1, #65, #97, and #100?
I believe I got it right and to go along with that Cleveland used it's 2nd round pick in the supplemental draft and NO had to forfiet thier 2nd round pick so starting in the 3rd round we really pick two spots earlier. So it's more like #61, #95 and #98.

Mother****erJones 03-19-2013 07:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by philfree (Post 9513064)
I believe I got it right and to go along with that Cleveland used it's 2nd round pick in the supplemental draft and NO had to forfiet thier 2nd round pick so starting in the 3rd round we really pick two spots earlier. So it's more like #61, #95 and #98.
Oh ok my bad

notorious 03-19-2013 07:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bewbies (Post 9512843)
No. In the 6th round Oakland is targeting a cricket player from Pakistan that just outran a camel.
You know they will get nervous and pick him in the first.

philfree 03-19-2013 07:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtchiefs4life (Post 9513067)
Oh ok my bad
You weren't bad.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:12 AM.
Page 13 of 14 « First 39101112 13 14
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.