Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 10007803)

Well, at this point the question is twofold:

1. Who is (almost?) as good as Smith?
2. Who would keep I-72 off the field?

Answer? Manuel, for one. (With a very narrow sample size, of course.)

Originally Posted by JENKINSWINS (Post 10007820)

I haven't watched any Bills games and would like to know how his Oline ranks vs KC's before coming that conclusion.

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 10007828)

Yeah, I don't give a mother**** about Buffalo's offensive line. Get the **** out of here with that nonsense.

When a team invests the #1 overall pick on a RT, the line is supposed to be "fixed." No excuses.

Originally Posted by JENKINSWINS (Post 10007842)

SMH :shake:

Originally Posted by JENKINSWINS (Post 10007739)

Do you understand he is the "focal point" even though the defense is playing great?

Originally Posted by JENKINSWINS (Post 10007820)

I haven't watched any Bills games and would like to know how his Oline ranks vs KC's before coming that conclusion.

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 10007866)

Of course I do.



The Bills have one of the best lines in the league.

Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 10007843)

Flacco's and Rodgers stats today?

eleventy billion yds?

NOPE

Originally Posted by JENKINSWINS (Post 10007886)

Well there you go.

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 10007899)

:facepalm:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 10007689)

LMAO. I'm not sure about the level of nuance and reading comprehension that's mandated in the Utah public school system, which I'm assuming you're a product of (given your level of love for all football players Mormon).

Regardless, try to see that my post, which your hyperbolic ass quoted, referenced Smith's entire body of work in KC. Therefore, your first point is a complete sack of shit. No pun intended.

And yes, mediocre does include the following: "seeing the whole field"; "making sure that the ball goes in a positive direction"; "going through multiple progressions"; "winning the ball control"; and "allowing your dynamic playmakers on defense to be rested."

FFS. This is where we're at as a fanbase. Apparently, the quoted is "high-quality" in terms of QB play for the Chiefs.

Pull your head out of a Mormon lineman's ass, Saccofshit, and realize that we're seeing the same shit that some of us who were old enough to grow pubes at the time saw in the mid-90s. If that's not you, cool. Pull up the kiddie table and take a seat.

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 10007713)

Yes. Some Donkey fan claimed earlier today that P. Manning is essentially a "game manager."

It's just ****ing stupid.

Alex Smith played like a scared ****ing bitch on Thursday until finding the testicles to make a great third-down throw midway through the fourth. He misses on that throw, and he's the pinata of CP this entire week.

Meanwhile, some are able to claim "3-0!" which is great, but meaningless in terms of evaluating the overall strengths and weaknesses of the team. Again, nuance is a bit harder.

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 10007743)

No, they don't. But I'll say that Smith would definitely be a HUGE part of this problem, along with the absolute joke of the right side of the line. Hello, Fisher.

The offense must start to stretch the field. Period. The inability to do this is damn near crippling.