ChiefsPlanet
Page 13 of 54 « First 39101112 13 1415161723 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Fisher to LT? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=282553)

htismaqe 03-25-2014 10:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 10515287)
Let's just pretend that Albert was not on the roster.
I don't have to pretend anything.

He pointed to the history of other teams, I didn't.

The fact that Albert was on the roster is irrelevant.

jd1020 03-25-2014 10:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 10515287)
Let's just pretend that Albert was not on the roster.
Lets just pretend that he should have been if they were picking Fisher.

kcchiefsus 03-25-2014 10:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10515264)
I'm really digging the "he was out out position, it's the coaches fault he sucked". Against nfl level competition, for the most part, he was physically beaten.

Chiefs fans. It's never ever on the player. "Coordinators sucks, coaching sucks,"
Ok, he was physically beaten. He's also a rookie from a small school who was taking a big step up in competition. He probably shouldn't have even started last year. He clearly wasn't ready. It doesn't mean he can't make massive improvements.

htismaqe 03-25-2014 10:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 10515286)
Don't you just love it when one person is saying that everyone else is wrong and just does not understand or can't read what that one person is writing. Yep the problem is everyone else not the singular entity.
ROFL

BigMeatballDave 03-25-2014 10:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10515283)
The Chiefs didn't. They started him at RIGHT tackle.
:facepalm:

philfree 03-25-2014 10:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 10515259)
This.

What's so wrong with saying something like the following:

"Going into training camp, we need to address our LT position. We have two great young players that we're very confident in, Eric Fisher and Donald Stephenson. We're going to let them compete at that spot and give the job to the player we feel is best prepared to protect our QB's blind side."


Our 1.1 needs every snap he can get to maximize his and our chance of success. Then if he struggles bad enough they'll do something different. I mean if they were damming the torpedoes in regards to playing Fisher playing LT they would have forced him into it last year. Relax it's only March.

htismaqe 03-25-2014 10:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcchiefsus (Post 10515293)
Ok, he was physically beaten. He's also a rookie from a small school who was taking a big step up in competition. He probably shouldn't have even started last year. He clearly wasn't ready. It doesn't mean he can't make massive improvements.
Truth.

BigMeatballDave 03-25-2014 10:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10515291)
I don't have to pretend anything.

He pointed to the history of other teams, I didn't.

The fact that Albert was on the roster is irrelevant.
Splitting hairs, much?

duncan_idaho 03-25-2014 10:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 10515284)
The only thing it says is that he would be playing LT.
That's it.
The position he was drafted at 1.1 to play.

Hilarious that the same people that bitched about Dorsey saying that Fisher was penciled in at RT are now bitching because Reid simply says he will be "playing LT"
Completely different things.

On one end: You're taking a "safe" player at 1.1 overall to play him at RT for a year and then slide him to LT to replace a good player.

On the other: You're giving the LT spot to that same safe player despite him being extremely disappointing as a rookie and being outplayed overall by another young player on the roster.

beach tribe 03-25-2014 10:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10515275)
That we took at 1.1.

We were told he was the way player available in the draft. Either we were lied to, or our front office sucked.
There was a Pro-bowl LT on the roster.

Are you suggesting we play Albert at G, or RT?

htismaqe 03-25-2014 10:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCD (Post 10515295)
:facepalm:
You pointed to the history of other teams, did you not?

Yet, you don't have any examples of other teams doing what the Chiefs did, do you?

I'm sorry you painted yourself in to a corner. I'll take it easier on you next time.

OnTheWarpath15 03-25-2014 10:18 AM
Wow.

We've gone from "no problem handing him the job without any competition based solely on being 1.1" to "he shouldn't have even started last year, he clearly wasn't ready."

Interesting twist. He's good enough to be 1.1 and be handed a job, but not good enough to start in his rookie season.

LMAO

O.city 03-25-2014 10:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcchiefsus (Post 10515293)
Ok, he was physically beaten. He's also a rookie from a small school who was taking a big step up in competition. He probably shouldn't have even started last year. He clearly wasn't ready. It doesn't mean he can't make massive improvements.
Ad this was the guy we said was the best player in the entire draft. Does no one else see the farce here?

Te best player we thought available, got physically beaten and was te 3rd best tackle in our team.

RunKC 03-25-2014 10:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10515268)
Neither is drafting shitty players.
Judging rookies after one year is always the logical thing to do ROFL

htismaqe 03-25-2014 10:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCD (Post 10515302)
Splitting hairs, much?
Tap out acknowledged.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:17 AM.
Page 13 of 54 « First 39101112 13 1415161723 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.