ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   MU ****Official 2015 Missouri Tigers Football Thread**** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=289639)

Pasta Little Brioni 09-19-2015 12:34 PM

Broncoesque cheap shot

baitism 09-19-2015 12:39 PM

Abbington looks slow as hell.

baitism 09-19-2015 12:42 PM

Wtf is with these cushions?

kepp 09-19-2015 12:42 PM

Kenya Dennis has not been very impressive year.
Posted via Mobile Device

TribalElder 09-19-2015 12:45 PM

When lock gets a TD does he now become starter :)

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 09-19-2015 12:47 PM

Bad throw

KCrockaholic 09-19-2015 12:47 PM

Damn. Juuust underthrew him, and also didn't get enough air under it.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 09-19-2015 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baitism (Post 11741672)
Abbington looks slow as hell.

Yes, he does.

notorious 09-19-2015 12:48 PM

UConn has a good team.

kepp 09-19-2015 12:49 PM

C'mon Lock...put some juice on it.
Posted via Mobile Device

notorious 09-19-2015 12:49 PM

What the **** was that? :facepalm:

TribalElder 09-19-2015 12:50 PM

It was likely more enjoyable watching that incomplete pass than it would have been watching baggett miss a fg

kepp 09-19-2015 12:50 PM

That's just a dumb call.
Posted via Mobile Device

baitism 09-19-2015 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 11741693)
UConn has a good team.

No, no they don't. Even if Mizzou wins, they should drop out of the rankings.

Bob Dole 09-19-2015 12:54 PM

Going to **** around and lose this.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 09-19-2015 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 11741693)
UConn has a good team.

Pretty good defense, below average team

notorious 09-19-2015 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baitism (Post 11741705)
No, no they don't. Even if Mizzou wins, they should drop out of the rankings.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rudy lost the toss (Post 11741716)
Pretty good defense, below average team

.

TribalElder 09-19-2015 01:01 PM

That's what the Chiefs should have done at the end of the game

notorious 09-19-2015 01:01 PM

How did the QB make the tackle?


Jesus, that was badass.

Took out the blocker and runner with one hit. :eek:

Rams Fan 09-19-2015 01:02 PM

This team is not winning the East this year.

Pasta Little Brioni 09-19-2015 01:03 PM

...and the Huskies go full ku

notorious 09-19-2015 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 11741743)
...and the Huskies go full ku

They came out of the closet?

kepp 09-19-2015 01:06 PM

I've seen nothing but ugly football this year. Good defense, but ugly football.
Posted via Mobile Device

Pitt Gorilla 09-19-2015 01:35 PM

Mizzou: Doesn't do it's job. Still does it's job.

Bob Dole 09-19-2015 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 11741738)
This team is not winning the East this year.

This team will be lucky to win another game.

Jerm 09-19-2015 02:07 PM

Quote:

@GabeDeArmond: Maty Mauk on being booed: "If that's how they feel, that's how they feel...That's why they're in the stands and I'm on the field."
:facepalm:

Sure-Oz 09-19-2015 02:09 PM

Mauk is a db

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-19-2015 02:11 PM

There isn't an answer to the offensive woes because they are systemic.

AJ Ricker is terrible at his job and should be fired (as the decrease in OL play for two years in a row despite returning five seniors with starting experience is clearly a testament to)

Mauk can't throw the ball between the hash marks or to the sidelines, which means that the only passing plays the offense can run are really running plays.

The backs lack vision, speed, and power. Witter may have some quickness, but he routinely picked the wrong hole today.

The WRs can't get open against bad competition and can't catch when they do.

It's just a historically bad offense and there's a good chance they set some school records for ineptitude, which is incredibly unfortunate, because this is an excellent defense, probably one of the top 10 in the country.

Army (a bottom five DI team) and Villanova (a I-AA team) put up more points on UConn than Missouri did.

It's going to get really ****ing ugly in SEC play. The only chance this team has to win games in conference is to force a shitload of turnovers.

Pitt Gorilla 09-19-2015 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 11741855)
There isn't an answer to the offensive woes because they are systemic.

AJ Ricker is terrible at his job and should be fired (as the decrease in OL play for two years in a row despite returning five seniors with starting experience is clearly a testament to)

Mauk can't throw the ball between the hash marks or to the sidelines, which means that the only passing plays the offense can run are really running plays.

The backs lack vision, speed, and power. Witter may have some quickness, but he routinely picked the wrong hole today.

The WRs can't get open against bad competition and can't catch when they do.

It's just a historically bad offense and there's a good chance they set some school records for ineptitude, which is incredibly unfortunate, because this is an excellent defense, probably one of the top 10 in the country.

Army (a bottom five DI team) and Villanova (a I-AA team) put up more points on UConn than Missouri did.

It's going to get really ****ing ugly in SEC play. The only chance this team has to win games in conference is to force a shitload of turnovers.

Agree with everything here. Have no idea what Ricker is doing.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 09-19-2015 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm (Post 11741846)
:facepalm:

Hahaha

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-19-2015 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 11741858)
Agree with everything here. Have no idea what Ricker is doing.

I know that you are much more plugged in than I am, as are guys with PM subscriptions. Ricker strikes me as a panic hire because of the unusual timing of Walker's retirement. Walker always seemed to get a lot out of marginally talented kids. Boehm was better as a Sophomore than he has been the last two years, and the OL as a whole looks slow and weak.

I have no idea why Walker retired, but it always struck me as odd.

Pitt Gorilla 09-19-2015 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 11741878)
I know that you are much more plugged in than I am, as are guys with PM subscriptions. Ricker strikes me as a panic hire because of the unusual timing of Walker's retirement. Walker always seemed to get a lot out of marginally talented kids. Boehm was better as a Sophomore than he has been the last two years, and the OL as a whole looks slow and weak.

I have no idea why Walker retired, but it always struck me as odd.

I think they saw Ricker as an up-and-comer. However, everything he has tried to "fix" has been a disaster.

Mosbonian 09-19-2015 03:18 PM

I think we are heading for a real kick in the butt next week at Kentucky.

Bowser 09-19-2015 03:25 PM

They need to just throw Lock in there as starter and live through his growing pains. Pinkel won't do it, but at this point it's the right move. Mauk has played like hot garbage through the three warmup games. He's going to get his shit eaten up against the SEC.

KChiefs1 09-19-2015 04:33 PM

SEC won't be fun this year.

NWTF 09-19-2015 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 11742036)
SEC won't be fun this year.

I was thinking the same thing.

nychief 09-19-2015 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 11742036)
SEC won't be fun this year.


No play makers on offense.

GloryDayz 09-19-2015 07:33 PM

We won. Woot... I did watch, but was doing carpet scrubbing, so I wasn't all up in here...

Pitt Gorilla 09-19-2015 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mosbonian (Post 11741960)
I think we are heading for a real kick in the butt next week at Kentucky.

Many examples of "lesser" teams playing well against the Power 5. Ohio State won by 7 today.

That said, Mizzou needs an offense like yesterday.

BryanBusby 09-19-2015 08:26 PM

Lock is certainly the better passer, I just don't think these receivers right now would do him any favors.

This offense is a shitbarn and would prefer they don't ruin him. For everyone that bitches about thr Chiefs line, they ahould watch MU play.

Saul Good 09-19-2015 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 11742524)
Lock is certainly the better passer, I just don't think these receivers right now would do him any favors.

This offense is a shitbarn and would prefer they don't ruin him. For everyone that bitches about thr Chiefs line, they ahould watch MU play.

Pass protection was outstanding today. No sacks, and Mauk had all day to stand in the pocket and not throw the ball.

BryanBusby 09-19-2015 09:32 PM

I wouldn't call it outstanding.

Mauk ran a lot and UConn also rushed only 3 a significant amount of time.

Rams Fan 09-19-2015 09:42 PM

Next week's gonna be a battle of 2 good defenses and 2 shitty excuses for offenses.

Mosbonian 09-19-2015 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 11742406)
Many examples of "lesser" teams playing well against the Power 5. Ohio State won by 7 today.

That said, Mizzou needs an offense like yesterday.

Yeah....but we played like crap and should have lost in reality. Mauk looked lost, playing with Zero confidence in himself, much less having any confidence in his receivers. Abbington looked lost.....Witter can't seem to pick the right hole to run thru and our best offensive play of the day was a lumbering #3 RB going 50+ yards.

I agree with what the announcers were talking about all day.....our DB's seemed to be playing 10 or more yards off the receivers. If we do that in conference play teams will just drive down the field doing nothing but killing us with short passes.

TrebMaxx 09-19-2015 09:49 PM

I think the lack of any running game is a big factor for the offenses shitty play. Hopefully once Hansbrough gets healthy things might improve.

Pitt Gorilla 09-19-2015 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mosbonian (Post 11742786)
Yeah....but we played like crap and should have lost in reality. Mauk looked lost, playing with Zero confidence in himself, much less having any confidence in his receivers. Abbington looked lost.....Witter can't seem to pick the right hole to run thru and our best offensive play of the day was a lumbering #3 RB going 50+ yards.

I agree with what the announcers were talking about all day.....our DB's seemed to be playing 10 or more yards off the receivers. If we do that in conference play teams will just drive down the field doing nothing but killing us with short passes.

Abbington couldn't find the right hole with a map.

Rams Fan 09-19-2015 10:05 PM

Guys, I don't think you realize how shitty next week is going to be to watch.

It's legit going to be like Mizzou playing Mizzou next week, except Towles isn't as good of a runner.

WhawhaWhat 09-19-2015 10:06 PM

Next week..

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Mississippi State @ Auburn, 7:30pm ET/6:30pm CT on ESPN2; Missouri @ Kentucky, 7:30pm ET/6:30pm CT on SEC Network</p>&mdash; Chuck Dunlap (@SEC_Chuck) <a href="https://twitter.com/SEC_Chuck/status/645441349425176578">September 20, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Mosbonian 09-19-2015 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 11742833)
Guys, I don't think you realize how shitty next week is going to be to watch.

It's legit going to be like Mizzou playing Mizzou next week, except Towles isn't as good of a runner.

Except we will be playing at Commonwealth Stadium....

And where Towles isn't a good runner, he does have the ability to pass.

While Mauk is a good runner, he can't pass for crap anymore. I would be less concerned if they let Lock play and we took our chances with him.

Rams Fan 09-19-2015 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mosbonian (Post 11742882)
Except we will be playing at Commonwealth Stadium....

And where Towles isn't a good runner, he does have the ability to pass.

While Mauk is a good runner, he can't pass for crap anymore. I would be less concerned if they let Lock play and we took our chances with him.

Towles is a ****ing piece of shit. Mother ****er got sacked 6 times today.

Though, he should have had a passing TD. WR dropped it in the end zone. Next play, he throws a semi-high pass(still should have been caught) and it's returned to the UK 19 for an INT.

The defense is spectacular for UK. Offense hasn't scored a TD in 6 quarters.

KChiefs1 09-20-2015 12:07 PM

Polls out yet?

Pepe Silvia 09-20-2015 12:17 PM

Ricker has got to go.

KChiefs1 09-20-2015 12:52 PM

25th

http://collegefootball.ap.org/poll

duncan_idaho 09-20-2015 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 11741878)
I know that you are much more plugged in than I am, as are guys with PM subscriptions. Ricker strikes me as a panic hire because of the unusual timing of Walker's retirement. Walker always seemed to get a lot out of marginally talented kids. Boehm was better as a Sophomore than he has been the last two years, and the OL as a whole looks slow and weak.

I have no idea why Walker retired, but it always struck me as odd.

Walker retired because he's super rich (from personal investments) and was a shitty recruiter who didn't want to work harder in a job he didn't need.

It was something that was rumored for a few years before it actually happened. Basically, he's enjoying his wealth and his grandkids.

WhawhaWhat 09-20-2015 06:10 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Wynn lines are out: Kentucky favored by 3 over Mizzou. MU 3-0 vs. UK since joining SEC. MU has outscored UK 101-37</p>&mdash; Dave Matter (@Dave_Matter) <a href="https://twitter.com/Dave_Matter/status/645751825010810880">September 21, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Eleazar 09-20-2015 06:13 PM

Never been a big Mauk fan. I think the Lock era should have started this year.

KChiefs1 09-21-2015 07:32 AM

http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/09...c1dafc9f4f.jpg

kcchiefsus 09-21-2015 07:56 AM

Isn't Mauk still only a junior? I am terrified next season that Gary Pinkel won't have the balls to sit Mauk for Lock and will play him simply because he's a senior.

duncan_idaho 09-21-2015 08:14 AM

I agree with predictions that Saturday could be a snooze fest (unless you're enthralled by good defense matching up against bad offense).

I've watched about a 5 quarters of Kentucky so far this year. They look to be a carbon copy of Missouri - good defense (though I think Missouri's is better, as I think Missouri's LB and DB corps are superior, and Charles Harris is a better pass rusher than anyone Kentucky has) and highly inconsistent and not good offenses.

chiefus-
Lock wouldn't be playing this year if Pinkel wasn't looking at the 2016 QB spot as an open competition. If they were rolling with Mauk, no matter what, Lock would be sitting and redshirting, instead of getting real game action.

I've heard enough from people close to the program (reporters, boosters) to be convinced this is the case.

Lock will have every chance to win the job next spring, and Mauk will have to take major steps to hold him off (it was really close in fall camp, and if Lock had enrolled in the spring and played spring football, he might have won the job THIS year). Hell, at this rate, Lock may be starting/playing before this season is over.

Lock still getting a possession in a three-point game this past Saturday, late in the 4th quarter, says that pretty clearly, IMO.

Rams Fan 09-21-2015 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 11745777)
I agree with predictions that Saturday could be a snooze fest (unless you're enthralled by good defense matching up against bad offense).

I've watched about a 5 quarters of Kentucky so far this year. They look to be a carbon copy of Missouri - good defense (though I think Missouri's is better, as I think Missouri's LB and DB corps are superior, and Charles Harris is a better pass rusher than anyone Kentucky has) and highly inconsistent and not good offenses.

Exactly. Mizzou's defense is more talented, but UK's defense is still really good.

I can see this game going either way. It depends how both Mauk and Towles play. UK's O hasn't scored a TD in 6 quarters.

Saul Good 09-21-2015 08:25 AM

Keep in mind that Hansbrough should be good to go on Saturday.

duncan_idaho 09-21-2015 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 11745794)
Exactly. Mizzou's defense is more talented, but UK's defense is still really good.

I can see this game going either way. It depends how both Mauk and Towles play. UK's O hasn't scored a TD in 6 quarters.

A few Maukerceptions that set them up with really short fields could be just the elixir they need.

So far this year, Missouri's defense has allowed 29 points. 16 came after Maukerceptions set the opposing offense up inside its own 30 (7 more came after a Lock pick gave Arkansas State the ball at the 40 or so).

Maukerception: An interception, in football, of a thrown forward pass, typically thrown off-balance, into a completely guarded area of the field; an interception after a completely indefensible decision to throw the ball.

Bowser 09-21-2015 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11745798)
Keep in mind that Hansbrough should be good to go on Saturday.

He shouldn't have seen the field against Arky State, but I digress...

KChiefs1 09-21-2015 11:36 AM

Mizzou's game vs South Carolina on October 3rd has been set for an 11 a.m. kickoff on the SEC Network.

KChiefs1 09-21-2015 11:38 AM

Turnovers will decide the Mizzou vs UK game.

Mizzou_8541 09-21-2015 11:40 AM

Saw this on PowerMizzou and thought I'd share here. Offensive ineptitude:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="da" dir="ltr">97. MU (passer rating)- 118.57; 116. MU (offense)-325.0; 118. MU (yds/play)- 4.85; 119. MU (rush offense)- 107.7; 122. MU (yds/rush)- 3.2.</p>&mdash; David Morrison (@DavidCMorrison) <a href="https://twitter.com/DavidCMorrison/status/645613680529293312">September 20, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Pepe Silvia 09-21-2015 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 11745841)
He shouldn't have seen the field against Arky State, but I digress...

This.

KChiefs1 09-25-2015 01:01 PM

****Official 2015 Missouri Tigers Football Thread****
 
http://www.kentucky.com/2015/09/24/4...ntucky-do.html

Quote:

Mark Story: Why can't Kentucky do in football what Missouri has done?

Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2015/09/24/4...#storylink=cpy


College football coaches have long been masters in the art of killing the upcoming opponent with flattery. Yet when he spoke about UK's foe this week, the admiration Kentucky Coach Mark Stoops expressed for Gary Pinkel's Missouri program seemed real.

"They've always played hard, and they win close games," Stoops said. "That's a credit to what they're doing and how they're coaching them. The energy that their team plays with is good."


What Pinkel has done the past two seasons at Missouri might be the most impressive SEC coaching job in my lifetime.

Since the start of the 2013 season, Missouri (3-0, 0-0 SEC) is 26-5. The Tigers are 14-2 in SEC regular-season contests. Mizzou has won 11 straight true road games.

In contests decided by one touchdown or less, the Tigers are 7-2.


This stretch of Mizzou success is made even more amazing when you recall that, after the Tigers suffered through an injury-plagued 5-7 SEC debut in 2012, many had Pinkel on the coaching hot seat entering 2013.

Even more impressively, Missouri has done all this winning with rosters over which the recruiting gurus have yawned.

Let's wade through some numbers.

From 2010-15, Florida signed 12 five-star recruits (using the Rivals.com data base), Georgia and Tennessee inked seven each.

Missouri signed one — wide receiver Dorial Green-Beckham in 2012.

In that same six-year time frame, Florida and Tennessee each signed 69 four-star recruits, while Georgia got 66, South Carolina 48 and even Kentucky lured 21 four-stars.

Missouri signed 19.

Mizzou's run to back-to-back SEC East championships has been fueled by three-star recruits. The Tigers have signed 107 three-stars since 2010. Among SEC East schools, only UK signed more three-stars (111) from 2010-2015.

The billion-dollar question is what has allowed Pinkel and Missouri to take three-stars and win division titles over schools whose recruiting, on paper, has been far superior?

From a distance, it seems Missouri has out-evaluated, out-developed and out-coached other SEC schools with more resources, more tradition and far more bountiful in-state recruiting bases.

(It also seems an appropriate time to point out again that recruiting rankings are not the Holy Grail. There is abundant imprecision built into the highly subjective process of projecting how good teenaged high school players will be as they mature into college-aged men. But that's a different column.)

Missouri has seemed especially adept at recruiting players who fit its system defensively. Every year, the Tigers run out new defensive ends who are remarkably similar in their ability to wreak havoc on opponents' offenses.

Two seasons ago, it was Kony Ealy (a four-star recruit who became a second-round NFL Draft pick) and Michael Sam (from two-star recruit to 2013 SEC Defensive Player of the Year). Last season, it was Markus Golden (a three-star recruit who became a second-round NFL Draft pick) and Shane Ray (three-star recruit to 2014 SEC Defensive Player of the Year).

This year, it's a new cast with, so far, the same plot. Last week, redshirt freshman defensive end Walter Brady, an unheralded two-star recruit out of Florence, Ala., had two quarterback sacks to help Mizzou escape a Connecticut upset bid. The week before, sophomore defensive end Charles Harris, a two-star recruit from Kansas City, had 41/2 tackles for loss in a win at Arkansas State.

"Missouri, after playing them (a) third year in a row here, it starts with them up front," Stoops said. "They are disruptive up front, just like Florida. They play hard and play with an edge to them. I like that."

Were I coaching football at UK, I would go to school on every aspect of Missouri's blueprint. If the Tigers can make real noise in the Southeastern Conference, why can't Kentucky?

"They're a very well-coached team," Stoops says of Missouri. "I have a lot of respect for Gary Pinkel, what he's done and the way his teams play."

After the prior two seasons, everybody should.

Mark Story: (859) 231-3230. Email: [email protected]. Twitter: @markcstory. Blog: markstory.bloginky.com
Maximizing Missouri

In only three full seasons in the SEC, the Missouri Tigers have already won the SEC East twice. This in spite of the fact that, according to recruiting service Rivals, Mizzou did not sign as many four-star and five-star recruits from 2010 through 2015 as most of its SEC East rivals:

MOST FIVE-STARS SIGNED

Florida 12, Georgia 7, Tennessee 7, South Carolina 2, Missouri 1, Kentucky 0, Vanderbilt 0.

MOST FOUR-STARS SIGNED

Florida 69, Tennessee 69, Georgia 66, South Carolina 48, Kentucky 21, Missouri 19, Vanderbilt 15.

MOST THREE-STARS SIGNED

Kentucky 111, Missouri 107, Vanderbilt 93, South Carolina 92, Tennessee 70, Georgia 68, Florida 55.

MOST TWO-STARS SIGNED

Vanderbilt 27, Kentucky 19, Missouri 13, South Carolina 9, Tennessee 9, Florida 6, Georgia 6.

Records of SEC East programs, 2013-now

Team. Overall. SEC

Missouri. 26-5. 14-2-x

Georgia 21-8 13-5

S. Carolina 19-9 9-9

Florida 14-14 8-9

Tennessee 14-14 5-11

Vanderbilt 13-15 4-13

Kentucky 9-18. 3-15

x-Does not include losses in SEC Championship Game in 2013 and 2014.

Mark Story

Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2015/09/24/4...#storylink=cpy


Rams Fan 09-26-2015 10:12 AM

Any CP faithful going to Lexington today?

Discuss Thrower 09-26-2015 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 11755615)
Any CP faithful going to Lexington today?

I wanted to go, but I've got to be at a wedding today.

Rams Fan 09-26-2015 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 11755618)
I wanted to go, but I've got to be at a wedding today.

At least you have your priorities straight.

Mosbonian 09-26-2015 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 11755615)
Any CP faithful going to Lexington today?

I will tell you that few will go to Lexington, even though it really isn't that much of a drive, especially for the STL area fans.

When I lived there I extended the offer to anyone who was coming to stop by or, for the few I trust on here, the offer of a room for the night.

No one accepted.

Discuss Thrower 09-26-2015 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 11755689)
At least you have your priorities straight.

Well it's for the better. This happened to be the weekend before I have assignments due in all of my grad classes.

WhawhaWhat 09-26-2015 05:44 PM

Jerseys looking good on both sides tonight.

kepp 09-26-2015 06:06 PM

Nice to see our young recievers staying active during that type of play...good drive.
Posted via Mobile Device

WhawhaWhat 09-26-2015 06:06 PM

Great drive by the offense. Mauk made some nice passes, Hansbrough with extra effort to get a first down, O-Line with great blocking on the TD pass especially that blitz pickup.

kepp 09-26-2015 06:22 PM

Great arm tackling, guys.
Posted via Mobile Device

kepp 09-26-2015 06:30 PM

Hunt would have gotten that.
Posted via Mobile Device

TribalElder 09-26-2015 06:32 PM

Should have sacked up and got the 1 yard

Good punt though

TribalElder 09-26-2015 06:34 PM

Might want to guard the middle of the field maybe


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.