ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Let’s talk about the Eagles (Super Bowl edition!) (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=347246)

louie aguiar 02-02-2023 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16786149)
It's not a controversial statement. I don't even disagree.

I'm clearly talking about your immediate assumption that he won't even make it through the game in response to the good news that he's looking like he'll play.

Again, you did the same negative bullshit with Mahomes ankle. There's a pattern.

Remember when you were telling CP that signing Jarran f’ing Reed was going to be the best move of the NFL last offseason? LMAO

staylor26 02-02-2023 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by louie aguiar (Post 16786165)
Remember when you were telling CP that signing Jarran f’ing Reed was going to be the best move of the NFL last offseason? LMAO

Yea, I'm the only one that was excited about getting an interior pass rusher in their prime that was capable of double digit sacks :rolleyes:

Typical loser that will ignore everything I was right about the last several years.

Your deflection is noted though.

Sassy Squatch 02-02-2023 06:56 PM

So it's white on red.

louie aguiar 02-02-2023 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16786168)
Yea, I'm the only one that was excited about getting an interior pass rusher in their prime that was capable of double digit sacks :rolleyes:

Typical loser that will ignore everything I was right about the last several years.

Your deflection is noted though.

It was a horrible take. You’ve had plenty of them. Ive had plenty of bad takes too. That’s the nature of putting opinions on an internet message board. Calm down dude.

dannybcaitlyn 02-02-2023 06:58 PM

A healthy rested Justin Watson in a controlled climate should help the O.

staylor26 02-02-2023 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 16786180)
So it's white on red.

I saw that. Wish it were all white.

ToxSocks 02-02-2023 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16786189)
I saw that. Wish it were all white.

My son was hoping and wishing for that too. I prefer the white/reds though. Actually, i prefer the all reds but w/e.

Sassy Squatch 02-02-2023 07:01 PM

White on white makes us look like a bunch of used tampons

Stryker 02-02-2023 07:06 PM

I just ordered my Mahomes white jersey with SB LIVII patch! Let's freaking do this! GEAUX CHIEFS!

FloridaMan88 02-02-2023 07:08 PM

Lot’s of Chiefs fans live outside of the KC-area… don’t think this is an accurate reflection of what the crowd make-up will be…

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">It’s a Philly thing—apparently so is buying Super Bowl tickets— according to <a href="https://twitter.com/TickPick?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@TickPick</a> 24% of SB tickets have been purchased from PA so far.<br> <br>Roughly 7% from Missouri and Kansas combined…Stadium will be very green Sunday—I gotta see if I can get me 5 tickets to get that # up.</p>&mdash; Dan Orlovsky (@danorlovsky7) <a href="https://twitter.com/danorlovsky7/status/1621294497043988481?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 2, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Stryker 02-02-2023 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 16786201)
Lot’s of Chiefs fans live outside of the KC-area… don’t think this is an accurate reflection of what the crowd make-up will be…

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">It’s a Philly thing—apparently so is buying Super Bowl tickets— according to <a href="https://twitter.com/TickPick?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@TickPick</a> 24% of SB tickets have been purchased from PA so far.<br> <br>Roughly 7% from Missouri and Kansas combined…Stadium will be very green Sunday—I gotta see if I can get me 5 tickets to get that # up.</p>&mdash; Dan Orlovsky (@danorlovsky7) <a href="https://twitter.com/danorlovsky7/status/1621294497043988481?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 2, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Fun fact, those tickets are currently going for $7500 a piece!

Stryker 02-02-2023 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 16786194)
White on white makes us look like a bunch of used tampons

Way better than the red pants the consensus on this board dislikes! :thumb:

staylor26 02-02-2023 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 16786194)
White on white makes us look like a bunch of used tampons

I mean have you ever seen a used tampon?

Usually the bottom half is red while the top is white.

I'd argue that white on red looks even more like one ;).

https://i.imgur.com/iLk6YTX.jpg

Bearcat 02-02-2023 07:28 PM

24% of what... a 100 tickets that have been sold on a ticketing website I've never heard of, are from Philly..... SO MUCH GREEN!

kccrow 02-02-2023 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 16786194)
White on white makes us look like a bunch of used tampons

I agree. Not a big fan of white on white.

Pasta Little Brioni 02-02-2023 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 16786232)
24% of what... a 100 tickets that have been sold on a ticketing website I've never heard of, are from Philly..... SO MUCH GREEN!

SOOOOO MANY BENGAL FANS DOWNTOWN!!! IT MAY BE 50 50 SUNDAY!

KCUnited 02-02-2023 07:32 PM

White on white would've been cool for Len

smithandrew051 02-02-2023 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCUnited (Post 16786237)
White on white would've been cool for Len

Frescas and cigarettes at half time!!

Pepe Silvia 02-02-2023 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 16786232)
24% of what... a 100 tickets that have been sold on a ticketing website I've never heard of, are from Philly..... SO MUCH GREEN!

Screw Orlovsky and his out of bounds loving ass.

Stryker 02-02-2023 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCUnited (Post 16786237)
White on white would've been cool for Len

Isn't that the point? We are currently wearing #16 on OUR helmets.

Titty Meat 02-02-2023 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCUnited (Post 16786237)
White on white would've been cool for Len

Winning it for Len would be even cooler :)

KCUnited 02-02-2023 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 16786314)
Winning it for Len would be even cooler :)

Feel thats a given its just how we look doing it

Rainbarrel 02-02-2023 08:11 PM

SOS and the Super Bowl
Chiefs....16th
Eagles....31st

Those with 10 points or more stronger strength of schedule than their opponent are 10-2

Chiefs Pantalones 02-02-2023 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16785966)
Juju and Toney are playing

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">What have opposing DCs said about Patrick Mahomes play lately and the new style the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#chiefs</a> have created on offense? Plus a number of Mahomes’ weapons are not practicing today. Here is who you need to be worried about. My report on NFL NOW on <a href="https://twitter.com/nflnetwork?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@nflnetwork</a> <a href="https://t.co/QK2mIU99fa">pic.twitter.com/QK2mIU99fa</a></p>&mdash; James Palmer (@JamesPalmerTV) <a href="https://twitter.com/JamesPalmerTV/status/1621220102032048137?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 2, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Of course they’re playing. It’s the final game of the season. Unless you’re on your death bed you’re giving it a go. You have all offseason to get better after this. That’s why Hardman is seeking another opinion because he wants to try to play.

MahomesIsTheMVP 02-02-2023 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 16786201)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">It’s a Philly thing—apparently so is buying Super Bowl tickets— according to <a href="https://twitter.com/TickPick?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@TickPick</a> 24% of SB tickets have been purchased from PA so far.<br> <br>Roughly 7% from Missouri and Kansas combined…Stadium will be very green Sunday—I gotta see if I can get me 5 tickets to get that # up.</p>&mdash; Dan Orlovsky (@danorlovsky7) <a href="https://twitter.com/danorlovsky7/status/1621294497043988481?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 2, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I don’t believe this bullshit.

Orlovsky is a cuck.

RunKC 02-02-2023 11:05 PM

Everybody is picking the Eagles. Love being underdogs

Jerm 02-02-2023 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16786503)
Everybody is picking the Eagles. Love being underdogs

It’s hilarious to me…they never learn.

The Eagles haven’t played any elite QBs or offenses, Hurts is more compromised than Mahomes, their defensive scheme plays right into our hands, and Siriani/Hurts have never been in this big of a game…we have and we’re battle tested.

Two weeks for Andy and Spags to cook something up…?

There’s zero doubt in my mind the Chiefs are winning this game and it wouldn’t surprise me if we curbstomp them.

New World Order 02-02-2023 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16786503)
Everybody is picking the Eagles. Love being underdogs

Yes sir

RaidersOftheCellar 02-02-2023 11:49 PM

One thing I haven’t seen discussed much is Mahomes’ history vs the NFC.

This year: 5-0

Blew out AZ on the road without breaking a sweat
Blew out Brady on the road
Blew out SF on the road
Sleepwalked through a blowout of the Rams
Blew out Seattle in Arrowhead

Last year: 5-0

Blew out Eagles on the road
Blew out Washington on the road
Beat the Giants
Beat Green Bay
Beat Dallas convincingly

2020: 4-1

Whipped Brady’s ass on the road
Beat NO/Brees on the road
Beat Carolina
Beat Atlanta

2019: 3-0

Beat Detroit on the road
Blew out Chicago on the road
Beat SF in the Super Bowl

2018: 2-2

Beat 49ers by double digits
Beat AZ by double digits
Lost in LA 54-51
Lost in Seattle 38-31

17-0 in the regular season the past four years. Mostly blowouts. Only loss being the SB with a 3rd string OL and 10+ flags from Cheffers.

First year would have been a sweep as well with any sort of a defense.

Rasputin 02-03-2023 02:56 AM

We need to win this to avenge Santa Claus.

Rainbarrel 02-03-2023 03:31 AM

If they run up the score on bad teams. That hasn't worked well for Lamar and Allen. *Winning close games builds team chemistry. Fight to the last whistle mentality is just SOP

Edit- *could be part of Andy's season long preparation for the postseason

ThyKingdomCome15 02-03-2023 03:35 AM

Burrow >>> Hurts

CupidStunt 02-03-2023 05:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm (Post 16786511)
It’s hilarious to me…they never learn.

The Eagles haven’t played any elite QBs or offenses, Hurts is more compromised than Mahomes, their defensive scheme plays right into our hands, and Siriani/Hurts have never been in this big of a game…we have and we’re battle tested.

Two weeks for Andy and Spags to cook something up…?

There’s zero doubt in my mind the Chiefs are winning this game and it wouldn’t surprise me if we curbstomp them.

I agree with a lot of this, but defensive scheme? Their run D sucks (which teams don't try to abuse), their pass-rush is absurd and could definitely exploit a weakness like our tackles, and they're good in the secondary. LBs are definitely exploitable.

I think Andy and co will devise a great plan, and obviously they haven't seen anything like a Mahomes-led offense, but I'm not sure how it's a great matchup. The 9ers, for example, would've been better. Much better run D, a less diverse pass-rush that we could scheme against 1 guy, and worse in the secondary.

ChiefRocka 02-03-2023 05:28 AM

We need to go up 13-0 and then remind Hurts this was the score when Saban replaced you with Tua. Probably Chris Jones narrating at the line.

Seriously though, Hurts is not a great thrower of the football, poor mans Lamar Jackson. I feel 5x better going into this Superbowl matchip than the last two AFCC games. If we don't turn it over.

I got it 35-20 in a no doubter by halftime.

Danguardace 02-03-2023 05:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm (Post 16786511)
It’s hilarious to me…they never learn.

The Eagles haven’t played any elite QBs or offenses, Hurts is more compromised than Mahomes, their defensive scheme plays right into our hands, and Siriani/Hurts have never been in this big of a game…we have and we’re battle tested.

Two weeks for Andy and Spags to cook something up…?

There’s zero doubt in my mind the Chiefs are winning this game and it wouldn’t surprise me if we curbstomp them.

Every year the Bills come into the post season with a highly decorated defense in terms of stats, then they get sliced up. Regular season means nothing now you're not playing Tyler Heineken or Danny Dimes in a Superbowl

Why Not? 02-03-2023 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danguardace (Post 16786592)
Every year the Bills come into the post season with a highly decorated defense in terms of stats, then they get sliced up. Regular season means nothing now you're not playing Tyler Heineken or Danny Dimes in a Superbowl

Even Tyler Heineken put up 35 vs these guys.

farmerchief 02-03-2023 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16786189)
I saw that. Wish it were all white.

White on White makes our guys look faster!

Rainbarrel 02-03-2023 07:33 AM

Rodgers left the game in the third quarter and lost 33-40 in overtime

Jerm 02-03-2023 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CupidStunt (Post 16786586)
I agree with a lot of this, but defensive scheme? Their run D sucks (which teams don't try to abuse), their pass-rush is absurd and could definitely exploit a weakness like our tackles, and they're good in the secondary. LBs are definitely exploitable.

I think Andy and co will devise a great plan, and obviously they haven't seen anything like a Mahomes-led offense, but I'm not sure how it's a great matchup. The 9ers, for example, would've been better. Much better run D, a less diverse pass-rush that we could scheme against 1 guy, and worse in the secondary.

Their pass rush is good no doubt but they play the most vanilla ass zone scheme and rarely come out of it….keep Pat upright and he’s going to carve them up.

tredadda 02-03-2023 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CupidStunt (Post 16786586)
I agree with a lot of this, but defensive scheme? Their run D sucks (which teams don't try to abuse), their pass-rush is absurd and could definitely exploit a weakness like our tackles, and they're good in the secondary. LBs are definitely exploitable.

I think Andy and co will devise a great plan, and obviously they haven't seen anything like a Mahomes-led offense, but I'm not sure how it's a great matchup. The 9ers, for example, would've been better. Much better run D, a less diverse pass-rush that we could scheme against 1 guy, and worse in the secondary.

When has KC ever taken advantage of that against any team? I think of all stats one could come up with regarding a team that stat is the least relevant.

tredadda 02-03-2023 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefRocka (Post 16786589)
We need to go up 13-0 and then remind Hurts this was the score when Saban replaced you with Tua. Probably Chris Jones narrating at the line.

Seriously though, Hurts is not a great thrower of the football, poor mans Lamar Jackson. I feel 5x better going into this Superbowl matchip than the last two AFCC games. If we don't turn it over.

I got it 35-20 in a no doubter by halftime.

Nah, he might not be the second coming of Montana, but he is a better passer than Jackson.

Indian Chief 02-03-2023 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 16786622)
Nah, he might not be the second coming of Montana, but he is a better passer than Jackson.

Seriously. I'm getting tired of the weak takes around here.

Youngbuck17 02-03-2023 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThyKingdomCome15 (Post 16786580)
Burrow >>> Hurts

Stats don't ever tell the full story, but they can point out the flaws in basic arguments.

Passing Yards:
Burrow: 4,475 (in 606 pass attempts)
Hurts: 3,701 (in 460 pass attempts) (remember Hurts missed a few games)

Completion %:
Burrow: 68.3%
Hurts: 66.5%

Passing TD/INT:
Burrow: 35/12
Hurts: 22/6

QB Rate:
Burrow: 100.8
Hurts: 101.6

Rushing yards and TDs:
Burrow: 257 yards and 5 TDs
Hurts: 760 yards and 13 TDs

20+ yard plays:
Burrow: 53
Hurts: 52

40+ yard plays:
Burrow: 10
Hurts: 11

DJ's left nut 02-03-2023 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefRocka (Post 16786589)
We need to go up 13-0 and then remind Hurts this was the score when Saban replaced you with Tua. Probably Chris Jones narrating at the line.

Seriously though, Hurts is not a great thrower of the football, poor mans Lamar Jackson. I feel 5x better going into this Superbowl matchip than the last two AFCC games. If we don't turn it over.

I got it 35-20 in a no doubter by halftime.

Nah.

Rich man's Alex Smith.

O.city 02-03-2023 08:58 AM

Anyone that argues that Hurts is a better QB than Burrow seriously needs a head examination.

RunKC 02-03-2023 08:58 AM

Stop. The. Run. These guys are very vulnerable if you make them pass.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Jalen Hurts has been sacked 38 times on 460 attempts while Mahomes has been sacked 26 times on 648 attempts. Either the Eagles O-Line isn’t as good as folks make it out to be or Hurts holds on to the ball too long. Either way, he can be got.</p>&mdash; Sterling Holmes (@HomestretchKC) <a href="https://twitter.com/HomestretchKC/status/1621271901816471552?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 2, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Youngbuck17 02-03-2023 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CupidStunt (Post 16786586)
I agree with a lot of this, but defensive scheme? Their run D sucks (which teams don't try to abuse), their pass-rush is absurd and could definitely exploit a weakness like our tackles, and they're good in the secondary. LBs are definitely exploitable.

I think Andy and co will devise a great plan, and obviously they haven't seen anything like a Mahomes-led offense, but I'm not sure how it's a great matchup. The 9ers, for example, would've been better. Much better run D, a less diverse pass-rush that we could scheme against 1 guy, and worse in the secondary.

The Eagles run defense isn't elite, but not as bad currently as the stats show. Once the Eagles added Suh and Joseph to the middle, and Davis came back from injury, they got much better. The games where they gave up the most rushing yards included scrambling QBs like Fields.

You're also undervaluing the the linebacker play. White has been an average player this year, but TJ Edwards (according to PFF) is tied for the 2nd most solo tackles in the league this year and grades out as one of the better pass-defending line backers in the league. He'll never blow you away with athleticism (in other words, he's not catching a speedy WR or probably even Kelce from behind) but he is excellent at diagnosing plays as they develop and taking the best angles to make a play.

htismaqe 02-03-2023 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 16786161)
I know a lot of people here aren't high on Watson, but having him back is a big help, in my opinion. His size and speed has to be accounted for. Other than that stretch where he had the dropsies, he's been pretty dependable.

My only complaint about Watson during the season was that he shouldn't be a guy getting more snaps than any other WR on the roster.

Like Run said, he's an excellent role player. But if he's on the field too much (and he was several times in the middle of the season) that's not necessarily a good thing, especially if Andy isn't going to run the ball.

O.city 02-03-2023 09:40 AM

So it's off subject but at this point we can put to bed the "bring back JJSS" stuff right?

Swimm 02-03-2023 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Youngbuck17 (Post 16786679)
Stats don't ever tell the full story, but they can point out the flaws in basic arguments.

Passing Yards:
Burrow: 4,475 (in 606 pass attempts)
Hurts: 3,701 (in 460 pass attempts) (remember Hurts missed a few games)

Completion %:
Burrow: 68.3%
Hurts: 66.5%

Passing TD/INT:
Burrow: 35/12
Hurts: 22/6

QB Rate:
Burrow: 100.8
Hurts: 101.6

Rushing yards and TDs:
Burrow: 257 yards and 5 TDs
Hurts: 760 yards and 13 TDs

20+ yard plays:
Burrow: 53
Hurts: 52

40+ yard plays:
Burrow: 10
Hurts: 11

Hurts passing stats on the year. He ranks #1 in the NFL from inside the pocket and also has the best TD-TO Ratio

I think some people here are also forgetting AJ Brown has almost 1500 yards on the season and DeVonta Smith is a few yards shy of 1200 yards. Dallas Goedert inspite being out some games has over 700 yards.

This team is very capable through the Air. The only question is Hurts health

cmd227 02-03-2023 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swimm (Post 16786809)
Hurts passing stats on the year. He ranks #1 in the NFL from inside the pocket and also has the best TD-TO Ratio

I think some people here are also forgetting AJ Brown has almost 1500 yards on the season and DeVonta Smith is a few yards shy of 1200 yards. Dallas Goedert inspite being out some games has over 700 yards.

This team is very capable through the Air. The only question is Hurts health

Thank you. Some of the posters on here are dismissing Jalens ability to throw the ball. He has improved drastically this year in that area with the stats to show. The shoulder though. That is the big unknown.

ToxSocks 02-03-2023 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swimm (Post 16786809)
Hurts passing stats on the year. He ranks #1 in the NFL from inside the pocket and also has the best TD-TO Ratio

I think some people here are also forgetting AJ Brown has almost 1500 yards on the season and DeVonta Smith is a few yards shy of 1200 yards. Dallas Goedert inspite being out some games has over 700 yards.

This team is very capable through the Air. The only question is Hurts health

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmd227 (Post 16786833)
Thank you. Some of the posters on here are dismissing Jalens ability to throw the ball. He has improved drastically this year in that area with the stats to show. The shoulder though. That is the big unknown.

Ok, that's great and all but both of these posts treat the shoulder like some passive, minor issue.

It's kind of a big deal. His stats since his shoulder injury are nowhere near as dazzling. It's not an "unknown". It's not really a "question". His shoulder is busted. He said as much yesterday. No one is even trying to hide it.

Eagles get to play a Mahomes with an injured ankle, Chiefs are playing a Hurts with a busted shoulder.

Those things can't just be dismissed.

Youngbuck17 02-03-2023 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16786846)
Ok, that's great and all but both of these posts treat the shoulder like some passive, minor issue.

It's kind of a big deal. His stats since his shoulder injury are nowhere near as dazzling. It's not an "unknown". It's not really a "question". His shoulder is busted. He said as much yesterday. No one is even trying to hide it.

Eagles get to play a Mahomes with an injured ankle, Chiefs are playing a Hurts with a busted shoulder.

Those things can't just be dismissed.

You're absolutely right. I think the OPers were probably bringing up the issue because none of the posts (that I saw) that spoke about Hurts not being very good (poor man's Lamar Jackson...etc) ever referenced his injured shoulder. Perhaps they meant "now that his shoulder is hurt" he's not as dynamic of a passer, but none of the posts downplaying him ever gave that disclaimer. So it makes it seem as though they are discussing his entire season, which I think is exactly what they were doing. As if he wasn't the MVP favorite or runner up prior to the injury.
But no doubt, the arm injury is a large concern now, and he simply hasn't looked as good since trying to come back from it. Mahomes may have an ankle injury but I'd take that all day over a QB with a shoulder injury on his throwing arm.

RunKC 02-03-2023 11:11 AM

Does it get any easier than this? Good God man

Here are the last 14 QBs the Eagles have faced:

Cooper Rush
Kenny Pickett
Davis Mills
Taylor Heinicke
Matt Ryan
Aaron Rodgers (scored 33 points)
Ryan Tannehill
Daniel Jones
Justin Fields
Dak Prescott (scored 34 points)
Andy Dalton
Daniel Jones
Daniel Jones
Josh Johnson

Also gave up 35 to Jared Goff…without Jameson Williams

DRM08 02-03-2023 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16786917)
Does it get any easier than this? Good God man

Here are the last 14 QBs the Eagles have faced:

Cooper Rush
Kenny Pickett
Davis Mills
Taylor Heinicke
Matt Ryan
Aaron Rodgers (scored 33 points)
Ryan Tannehill
Daniel Jones
Justin Fields
Dak Prescott (scored 34 points)
Andy Dalton
Daniel Jones
Daniel Jones
Josh Johnson

Also gave up 35 to Jared Goff…without Jameson Williams

Heck...the final week of the regular season, it wasn't even Daniel Jones for the Giants. It was their backup QB Davis Webb. The Giants pretty much forfeited that game by playing all backups.

kccrow 02-03-2023 11:24 AM

I'd probably have to deep dive into the games but at first glance it appears that the teams that shut down the Eagles offense (<24 pts) mostly shut down their running backs (not necessarily Hurts running) and it seemed like no back of theirs got more than 50 yards.

Key on that running game and hold them to 21 or less, I think Mahomes curb stomps them.

The Franchise 02-03-2023 11:29 AM

https://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/v...he-2022-season

There's all of their sacks if you want to go watch them.

Jesus Christ, Carson Wentz has literally ZERO pocket awareness.

smithandrew051 02-03-2023 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16786917)
Does it get any easier than this? Good God man

Here are the last 14 QBs the Eagles have faced:

Cooper Rush
Kenny Pickett
Davis Mills
Taylor Heinicke
Matt Ryan
Aaron Rodgers (scored 33 points)
Ryan Tannehill
Daniel Jones
Justin Fields
Dak Prescott (scored 34 points)
Andy Dalton
Daniel Jones
Daniel Jones
Josh Johnson

Also gave up 35 to Jared Goff…without Jameson Williams

It’s probably no coincidence that Reddick, Hargrave, Graham, and Sweat are all at different stages of their careers, but all just happened to post a career high in sacks this year. Even Fletcher Cox posted his highest total since 2018.

MahomesMagic 02-03-2023 11:33 AM

We do need a plan for Reddick. Can't allow him to just run around our tackles.

The Franchise 02-03-2023 11:37 AM

If you watch that sack video, Romo mentioned in one of the games that the Eagles love to rush 5. They also love to run a ton of stunts.

New World Order 02-03-2023 11:40 AM

We’re going to kill them!!!!

smithandrew051 02-03-2023 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 16786971)
We’re going to kill them!!!!

Okay now THAT would be epic

Youngbuck17 02-03-2023 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 16786953)
It’s probably no coincidence that Reddick, Hargrave, Graham, and Sweat are all at different stages of their careers, but all just happened to post a career high in sacks this year. Even Fletcher Cox posted his highest total since 2018.

Biggest reason, according to the players, for their increased sack totals this year (although Reddick has been in double digits before) is the depth of the Dline allowing them to sub quite often. So even though they are taking less reps, those reps are more productive as they stay fresh. Also, Sweat is a young player just coming into his own. I expected this jump for him this year. Hargrave and Graham have likely benefitted most by the more frequent subbing.

smithandrew051 02-03-2023 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Youngbuck17 (Post 16786995)
Biggest reason, according to the players, for their increased sack totals this year (although Reddick has been in double digits before) is the depth of the Dline allowing them to sub quite often. So even though they are taking less reps, those reps are more productive as they stay fresh. Also, Sweat is a young player just coming into his own. I expected this jump for him this year. Hargrave and Graham have likely benefitted most by the more frequent subbing.

Playing against awful QBs helps too

DRM08 02-03-2023 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Youngbuck17 (Post 16786899)
You're absolutely right. I think the OPers were probably bringing up the issue because none of the posts (that I saw) that spoke about Hurts not being very good (poor man's Lamar Jackson...etc) ever referenced his injured shoulder. Perhaps they meant "now that his shoulder is hurt" he's not as dynamic of a passer, but none of the posts downplaying him ever gave that disclaimer. So it makes it seem as though they are discussing his entire season, which I think is exactly what they were doing. As if he wasn't the MVP favorite or runner up prior to the injury.
But no doubt, the arm injury is a large concern now, and he simply hasn't looked as good since trying to come back from it. Mahomes may have an ankle injury but I'd take that all day over a QB with a shoulder injury on his throwing arm.

Do you think Jalen will need surgery when the season is over?

BryanBusby 02-03-2023 12:07 PM

What, is he turning to Jaylena during the offseason?

kccrow 02-03-2023 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16786965)
If you watch that sack video, Romo mentioned in one of the games that the Eagles love to rush 5. They also love to run a ton of stunts.

They blitz Reddick all the time.

I have a feeling Reid is going to screen them to death, honestly. Nothing better against an ultra-aggressive front like they have.

smithandrew051 02-03-2023 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 16787012)
They blitz Reddick all the time.

I have a feeling Reid is going to screen them to death, honestly. Nothing better against an ultra-aggressive front like they have.

Think McKinnon has a Damien Williams-like impact on this Super Bowl?

duncan_idaho 02-03-2023 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16786950)
https://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/v...he-2022-season

There's all of their sacks if you want to go watch them.

Jesus Christ, Carson Wentz has literally ZERO pocket awareness.

Wow.

Thanks for sharing. This kind of reinforced my thoughts about the Eagles' pass rush perhaps not being as dominant as stats alone would suggest.

Awful lot of bad, overmatched OLs (ie, not as good as the Chiefs). Awful lot of below average QBs being indecisive with the ball.

The Chiefs have a good OL, a QB with excellent pocket presence and awareness, and willl schematically work to get the ball out quick.

You don't see a LOT of quick wins in their season sack sequence. You see ends winning with power (even Reddick does not have a lot of quick-twitch wins). You see a group doing their job.

It's a good group, but the weak Os and QBs have inflated the sack numbers.

tredadda 02-03-2023 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Youngbuck17 (Post 16786899)
You're absolutely right. I think the OPers were probably bringing up the issue because none of the posts (that I saw) that spoke about Hurts not being very good (poor man's Lamar Jackson...etc) ever referenced his injured shoulder. Perhaps they meant "now that his shoulder is hurt" he's not as dynamic of a passer, but none of the posts downplaying him ever gave that disclaimer. So it makes it seem as though they are discussing his entire season, which I think is exactly what they were doing. As if he wasn't the MVP favorite or runner up prior to the injury.
But no doubt, the arm injury is a large concern now, and he simply hasn't looked as good since trying to come back from it. Mahomes may have an ankle injury but I'd take that all day over a QB with a shoulder injury on his throwing arm.

I’ve said it before and I will say it again, Hurts has really developed a ton since he was a rush first QB as a freshman at Alabama. How well he played this year is impressive. I also believe that if his injury is better by the SB, the Eagles will be tough. If not I like our chances on defense. I do not doubt our secondary’s ability to hang with the Eagles receivers after what they did last week. Hurts not being as effective of a thrower due to injury makes their job easier. Plus I would wonder how many times they would design run him knowing he is injured.

smithandrew051 02-03-2023 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 16787018)
Wow.

Thanks for sharing. This kind of reinforced my thoughts about the Eagles' pass rush perhaps not being as dominant as stats alone would suggest.

Awful lot of bad, overmatched OLs (ie, not as good as the Chiefs). Awful lot of below average QBs being indecisive with the ball.

The Chiefs have a good OL, a QB with excellent pocket presence and awareness, and willl schematically work to get the ball out quick.

You don't see a LOT of quick wins in their season sack sequence. You see ends winning with power (even Reddick does not have a lot of quick-twitch wins). You see a group doing their job.

It's a good group, but the weak Os and QBs have inflated the sack numbers.

The advanced stats on Pro Football Reference back this up. They’re middle of the pack in both Hurry % and Knockdown %.

They’re second in pressure percentage, but they’re right in line with the other top pass rushes in the league.

The chasm that exists between them and everybody else in sacks doesn’t seem to exist in the other pass rush metrics. That leads me to believe that the bad QBs they played all year weren’t good enough or didn’t have the presence to get rid of the ball. They either weren’t finding receivers or they didn’t know when to throw it away and live to fight another down.

I know these stats can be a little weird with how they’re calculated and all, but you would think a team that leads the league in sacks by 15 would also have a pretty wide margin over everyone else in the other metrics.

https://www.pro-football-reference.c...s/2022/opp.htm

ptlyon 02-03-2023 12:54 PM

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/s...imulation/amp/

kccrow 02-03-2023 12:56 PM

Odd thing I realized today when looking at the Eagles games...

When teams held the Eagles to less than 400 yards of total offense, the Eagles averaged 22.0 ppg and were 6-2.

In games where the Eagles had 400 or more yards of total offense, the Eagles averaged 33.6 ppg and were 10-1.

What was more interesting was how those teams held the Eagles' offense down.
In games of 400+ yards, the Eagles averaged 262.7 passing ypg and 174.7 rushing ypg. In those games < 400 yards, the Eagles averaged 185.5 passing ypg and 125.4 rushing ypg.

Of those 8 games < 400, remove the Saints game and you have only one instance where the Eagles rushed for less than 135 yards and that was the game they got destroyed by Washington (94 yds).

So the real theory might not be to sell out on the run to shut them down. It just may be to shut down the pass. Obviously, you can't let them pop off for 200+ rushing yards though.

kccrow 02-03-2023 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 16787016)
Think McKinnon has a Damien Williams-like impact on this Super Bowl?

Very possible.

smithandrew051 02-03-2023 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 16787079)
Odd thing I realized today when looking at the Eagles games...

When teams held the Eagles to less than 400 yards of total offense, the Eagles averaged 22.0 ppg and were 6-2.

In games where the Eagles had 400 or more yards of total offense, the Eagles averaged 33.6 ppg and were 10-1.

What was more interesting was how those teams held the Eagles' offense down.
In games of 400+ yards, the Eagles averaged 262.7 passing ypg and 174.7 rushing ypg. In those games < 400 yards, the Eagles averaged 185.5 passing ypg and 125.4 rushing ypg.

Of those 8 games < 400, remove the Saints game and you have only one instance where the Eagles rushed for less than 135 yards and that was the game they got destroyed by Washington (94 yds).

So the real theory might not be to sell out on the run to shut them down. It just may be to shut down the pass. Obviously, you can't let them pop off for 200+ rushing yards though.

That makes a lot of sense. Lamar Jackson put up some crazy passing performances when teams sold out against the run and let him make easy reads.

I really don’t think a run game alone is beating Mahomes. It takes balance and a QB on the other side making big throws. Probably smart to make that difficult on Hurts.

Boxer_Chief 02-03-2023 01:04 PM

Eagles had 29 sacks last year. I know they added Hargrave but that doesn’t really account for an increase of 40+ sacks. They’re good but as others said, it’s largely schedule attributed.

tredadda 02-03-2023 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 16787079)
Odd thing I realized today when looking at the Eagles games...

When teams held the Eagles to less than 400 yards of total offense, the Eagles averaged 22.0 ppg and were 6-2.

In games where the Eagles had 400 or more yards of total offense, the Eagles averaged 33.6 ppg and were 10-1.

What was more interesting was how those teams held the Eagles' offense down.
In games of 400+ yards, the Eagles averaged 262.7 passing ypg and 174.7 rushing ypg. In those games < 400 yards, the Eagles averaged 185.5 passing ypg and 125.4 rushing ypg.

Of those 8 games < 400, remove the Saints game and you have only one instance where the Eagles rushed for less than 135 yards and that was the game they got destroyed by Washington (94 yds).

So the real theory might not be to sell out on the run to shut them down. It just may be to shut down the pass. Obviously, you can't let them pop off for 200+ rushing yards though.

Take out the Minshew games and what are those records looking like? I would assume they are under 400 yard games?

tredadda 02-03-2023 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boxer_Chief (Post 16787091)
Eagles had 29 sacks last year. I know they added Hargrave but that doesn’t really account for an increase of 40+ sacks. They’re good but as others said, it’s largely schedule attributed.

They added Reddick who accounted for 16.

wachashi 02-03-2023 01:40 PM

I think the Chiefs matchup just fine offensively. I would be very surprised if we have problems moving the ball between the 20s.

I think there are a lot more questions about how we match up defensively. It's a unique offense using Run-Option, RPOs, and spread concepts. The addition of Brown at receiver really unlocked this offense and prevented teams from loading the box.

tredadda 02-03-2023 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wachashi (Post 16787140)
I think the Chiefs matchup just fine offensively. I would be very surprised if we have problems moving the ball between the 20s.

I think there are a lot more questions about how we match up defensively. It's a unique offense using Run-Option, RPOs, and spread concepts. The addition of Brown at receiver really unlocked this offense and prevented teams from loading the box.

I might be in the minority here but I think our DBs will do very well against their receivers. Not saying AJ and Devonta won't get theirs because they will. I just don't see them taking over the game, plus I don't think Hurts' shoulder will be 100% by game time.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.