![]() |
Quote:
And I'm OK with that, I'm not one of the Missouri folks who won't drive over to Kansas for watch a game because the Chiefs moved. The Chiefs are moving because Missouri is indeed a State that is willing to lose their sports teams and cry about useless truces that were signed many years ago. That's on the Governor of MO for not having the will to play hardball with a neighboring state in order to keep a team they claim they'd like to keep. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Right?!?!?!? "Sign a blank check or we'll move" was about what we were hearing. Again, most of us are fine with driving to KS for the occasional game knowing we'll be in T-shirts no matter what the weather is outside. As for the Royals, unless something dramatic happens, they'll fall back to their steady state of sucking and being the KCK Royals will be funny to hear about. |
Quote:
If the teams had a reasonable plan with real answers then I have no doubt White would have been on board. |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Listened to all of this. I think I'm more convinced now than ever that the Chiefs are moving. They literally say what I said yesterday...Missouri should focus on the Royals. |
Quote:
mmm you can not want billionaires to get handouts and vote accordingly. I agree with the idea. But you run the risk of being San Diego. You really showed them! Now to bask in my rightness while the Chargers play in SoFi |
Quote:
The majority of conversation I saw was that no voters still wanted the teams, but not these specific proposals. They seemed to convince themselves this wasn’t realistically a vote to keep the teams, but I believe that is the end result. Hunt especially, wants a new stadium. And I can’t blame him for wanting a new one as opposed to constant renovations to a stadium of which he probably doesn’t like the location. And getting a new stadium ready for the first season they need it doesn’t allow for a lot of playing games on where the stadium will be. |
Leave Arrowhead standing and show the game from the Kansas stadium on the big screen. Fans who refuse to go across state line can hang out in there and watch the game with dozens of other fans who refuse to hang out with wine and cheese fans.
Take numbers for George Brett Statue fights |
Frankly, I don't know if the Chiefs could have played this any better.
You can say their plan to stay at Arrowhead was half assed, and I was certainly underwhelmed with their updates, but isn't staying in Arrowhead basically what people wanted? The second they say hey were are going to blow this ****er up and build a dome there would have been a ton of debate. And the underlining problem with either the Chiefs and Royals staying at the Truman Sports complex, is that the County is the property owner and an owner is only going to invest so much on property that he doesn't own. Now Clark isn't going to own the new stadium either, but building something new allows the team to get all the amenities they want and need without having to sink in a healthy chunk of your net worth to get it built. Extending that 3/8 cent sales tax, a tax that people have been already paying for decades, was a ****ing no brainer if you wanted to lock the Royals and Chiefs into Missouri for decades to come. Frankly I don't even see a way for Missouri to compete with what Kanas has on the table. I think at the end of the day the Chiefs stadium team will look similar to what's being done in Nashville where sales tax revenue of the stadium and the surrounding neighborhood all go into servicing the bonds. That's way more aggressive than the puny 3/8 cent that they county is no longer paying. This is just the modern way to how these projects are funded. https://www.tennesseetitans.com/new-stadium/plan |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But yes, the Chiefs played this very well, they were either going to get a blank check from JACO or get the $2B+ stadium in KS. It's all good, it'll be a fun trip to make occasionally. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.