ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Walterfootball.com Mock Drafts (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=196458)

Mecca 01-29-2009 03:54 AM

Who are these mythical QB's you speak of?

AustinChief 01-29-2009 03:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeffp12 (Post 5437154)
It's not fear, it's playing the odds.

Mandarich was a roid riddled goon.

Personally If I was the chiefs I would try to trade down as much as we could, get as many picks as possible and then take James Lauranitis cause he seems to me to be the best bet to be a perennial pro bowler. Then with all those other picks you can go crazy taking risks and filling as many holes as possible. There's surely some decent QB prospects to be had in later rounds.

we CANT trade down... end of story... the MOST we could trade down is MAYBE 3 spots... and that is astonomically unlikely....

We are pretty much stuck at #3... and as much as I hate to agree with Mecca... Sanchez is prolly our best bet... AT THIS POINT... ALOT will change over the next few months.. and we may see a DE or NT rise enough to be worth the #3.... I certainly hope that is the case , because right now, the only "safe" pick is OT and as "safe" as that is... it sets us back yet another year...

jeffp12 01-29-2009 03:57 AM

I'm Hoping someone wants Crabtree bad enough to trade up.

Mecca 01-29-2009 03:59 AM

I still don't understand this QB fear, Sanchez is one of the best QB prospects you can ask for.

He's a better prospect than Sam Bradford who everyone here was creaming over.

Jim Jones 01-29-2009 04:11 AM

James Lauranitis? Jeeeeeeeysus

Ultra Peanut 01-29-2009 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeffp12 (Post 5437152)
We could have had Flacco last year. Do we look stupid for going with Branden Albert?

Albert was as close to a lock as you can get, Flacco was a risk/reward FCS QB, and we were still waiting to see if Croyle could bring it. So no, we weren't stupid.

Now that we DO have a stud LT, one idea that may be good is to not draft ANOTHER ****ING LT at #3 overall.

Ultra Peanut 01-29-2009 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5437162)
I still don't understand this QB fear, Sanchez is one of the best QB prospects you can ask for.

He's a better prospect than Sam Bradford who everyone here was creaming over.

But Big XII QBs

jeffp12 01-29-2009 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut (Post 5437459)
Albert was as close to a lock as you can get, Flacco was a risk/reward FCS QB, and we were still waiting to see if Croyle could bring it. So no, we weren't stupid.

Now that we DO have a stud LT, one idea that may be good is to not draft ANOTHER ****ING LT at #3 overall.

Who's going to be our RT this year? how about RG? Our Offensive line was still crap this year with Albert, the right side didn't do much. I'd rather we get a stud DT or DE...

Frosty 01-29-2009 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeffp12 (Post 5437805)
Who's going to be our RT this year? how about RG?

Yeah - god knows you can only get a quality RT or RG with a top 5 pick. :rolleyes:

DaneMcCloud 01-29-2009 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeffp12 (Post 5437805)
Who's going to be our RT this year? how about RG? Our Offensive line was still crap this year with Albert, the right side didn't do much. I'd rather we get a stud DT or DE...

First off, the right tackle and right guard positions (along with center) can be adequately addressed in rounds 2-5. Easily.

Furthermore, there are no "stud" DT's or DE's in this year's draft. The last "stud" DT was Glen Dorsey and the Chiefs got him.

QB HAS to be the pick #3.

BigChiefFan 01-29-2009 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5437899)
First off, the right tackle and right guard positions (along with center) can be adequately addressed in rounds 2-5. Easily.

Furthermore, there are no "stud" DT's or DE's in this year's draft. The last "stud" DT was Glen Dorsey and the Chiefs got him.

QB HAS to be the pick #3.

...and suppose Stafford and Sanchez go number one and two overall? It can't be QB or bust, a great GM has prepared for all scenarios.

ChiefsCountry 01-29-2009 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 5437917)
...and suppose Stafford and Sanchez go number one and two overall? It can't be QB or bust, a great GM has prepared for all scenarios.

St. Louis will not take a QB.

ChiefsCountry 01-29-2009 12:14 PM

This OL talk is driving me crazy. You can get great OL later in the draft. Szott was a 7th round pick. Shields was a 3rd. The whole freaking Patriots, Colts line was not made of first rounders. Take the QB first. You have to pay any QB a big salary no matter what. FA or draft. Its a given. And if you think G or C is more important than QB then you are freaking reerun.

BigChiefFan 01-29-2009 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5437932)
St. Louis will not take a QB.

You still have to prepare for that scenario. A new head coach has no loyalty to their QB, regardless of price tag. Warner starting over Leinart ring any bells? Just sayin'.

I think it's all going to be irrelevant anyway, because I think Pioli wants Cassell.

ChiefsCountry 01-29-2009 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 5437957)
I think it's all going to be irrelevant anyway, because I think Pioli wants Cassell.

No way does he trade for Cassell. I bet he doesnt he even sign away one Patriot starter.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.