10 sacks a year? Most teams have a guy that can get that. More than half.

Miller and Houston got that on what most would consider down years.

Mack is an overhyped Melvin Ingram.

Please, please please Raiders give him Von Miller money.

I’m pretty sure Mack’s #2 in sacks over the last 3 years. The only guy with more is Chandler Jones I believe. How is that not dominant?

12 sacks a season wouldn't put him in the top 5 for any of the past 3 seasons.

How can you say top 3?

He had ONE season in which he was a top 3 pass rusher. No other season has he cracked the top 5.

And don't tell me has has no help. Bruce Irvin was only two sacks short of Mack's total last season.

That's called consistency. Not dominance.

He's consistently "aight" since his 2nd year.

He does NOT take over a game.

I’ve confirmed it, he’s #2 in sacks over the last 3 years. What more do you want?

LMAO

.

He hasn’t had one of those big 15+ sacks seasons, but those are rare and even guys hat have them don’t usually repeat it.

If he’s nowhere close to Von, then what’s the excuse for him outsacking him the last 3 years?

By your logic, Von has also been “consistent”, not dominant. Not even he deserves Von Miller money.

You're jumping the shark here and you know it. Von Miller absolutely dominated and carried Denver on his back on their SB run which led to his massive contract. It was one of the best OLB performance i've seen in a long, log time.

Houston put together a 22 sack campaign that led to his paycheck. They both had absolutely monster seasons.

If 15 sacks is the best Khalil can do, that's not good enough for #1 OLB money.

Mack, in his lone playoff game got 0.0 sacks.

Trying to compare his "dominance" to Miller is silly.

If you're going to remove his rookie season as an outlier, then it's fair to remove his 15 sack season as an outlier too, right?

So based off the past two seasons he averages 10.75 sacks a season.

That's aight.

That's worth aight money.

I understand what you’re saying about Miller/Houston, but I’m pointing out that by your logic Miller has only been consistent over the last 3 years, not dominant. Shit, you could also say there hasn’t been a dominant edge rusher in the league since then if you are going to say that. I agree with your take that they shouldn’t give him what he’s asking for, but I don’t agree that he’s not a dominant edge rusher.

We can agree to disagree though.

Well they don't have to give him one if they don't want to really..

He is in the last year of his rookie contract that pays him almost 14 million
Then if they want they can tag him for two years.

Raiders really are the ones who hold the leverage...

I would rather have 5 good players than 1 great player... Don't get me wrong, I like Mack but hey the mans gotta do what he's gotta do.

This is the thing that pisses me off about the NFL and contracts...

When players suck they don't give the money back but when they play good they don't want to honor their contract.

Lots of people want to balk because they say Gruden got 100 million... Gruden says it's not 100 million first off and second that money does not go against the cap.

I don't care either way, If he stays great, if he is traded just get his worth.

Right. I was trying to make a very (apparently) unfunny joke.

It works both ways. Teams put all these dollars in deals they never have any intention of ever paying.

I have no qualms about any player fighting for what they feel is adequate compensation.

The Raiders are stiffing Mack because they are cap and cash poor.

Packers backups driving down the field against the Raiders 1st team D

LMAO

Shut the **** up Mack isn’t playing

/R8RFAN