ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Royals *** Official 2016 Royals Offseason Repository *** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=295826)

Lex Luthor 01-02-2016 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anyong Bluth (Post 11990554)
[emoji106]
Anyone who wants to dog on Jeremy and his contributions to the team over the past 3 years, obviously didn't watch much Royals beisbol. As for a Denver writer going after him now- strikes me as odd , and he probably should STFU, respectfully, of course.

Well, remember who it was that was dogging on him. He's already admitted that he doesn't really watch the games.

big nasty kcnut 01-02-2016 06:10 PM

Prison bitch.

Mother****erJones 01-02-2016 06:25 PM

Seems like the CWS and Gordon are using each other to get what they want. Cespedes to Chicago and Gordon back to KC.

MahiMike 01-02-2016 06:55 PM

Watched the 2 hour special recap on MLB today.

srvy 01-02-2016 07:15 PM

http://www.kansascity.com/sports/spt...320/yordanonew

duncan_idaho 01-02-2016 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wilson8 (Post 11991143)
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/ compares two pitchers that might be signed by the Royals, Ian Kennedy and Yovani Gallardo.



This is the last few paragraphs of the story -







http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/



So between these two pitchers, who would be a better possibility for Kansas City?



Side Note – I’ve read where Mark Buehrle wanted to move home to St. Louis and play for the Cardinals. Could he help Kansas City and would he consider playing close to home but with the Royals?


I'd take Kennedy because I think he has better raw stuff, Eiland has a history with him, and he's got more upside, IMO. I think Kennedy could have a Volquez-like bump up in Kansas City. He's also a giant red-ass, which I kind of dig.

Gallardo' plummeting K rate makes him the secondary target here, IMO. He'd still be good for KC and be a stabilizing, consistent force in their rotation.

Anyong Bluth 01-03-2016 02:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 11991789)
I'd take Kennedy because I think he has better raw stuff, Eiland has a history with him, and he's got more upside, IMO. I think Kennedy could have a Volquez-like bump up in Kansas City. He's also a giant red-ass, which I kind of dig.

Gallardo' plummeting K rate makes him the secondary target here, IMO. He'd still be good for KC and be a stabilizing, consistent force in their rotation.

Thank you. I get the feeling that people are looking at Gallardo as a much more attractive signing, but Kennedy has me more interested.

He seems cut of the same cloth of a number of Dayton type signings. It'll get 30 seconds of national attention, and he'll end up having a quiet but productive season.
I see no reason why he couldn't replicate a season similar to Edison.

That, gentleman, is a smart signing - especially for the dollars.

DeepSouth 01-05-2016 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 11991789)
I'd take Kennedy because I think he has better raw stuff, Eiland has a history with him, and he's got more upside, IMO. I think Kennedy could have a Volquez-like bump up in Kansas City. He's also a giant red-ass, which I kind of dig.

Gallardo' plummeting K rate makes him the secondary target here, IMO. He'd still be good for KC and be a stabilizing, consistent force in their rotation.

Duncan, what about Wei Yin Chen? He might cost a little more than Kennedy or Gallardo but he had a good year in 2015.

I don't believe the Royals will sign a pitcher until Gordon signs somewhere. If the Royals retain Gordon, I don't envision them giving up their only 1st round pick to sign any pitcher that was given a qualifying offer. If Gordon signs somewhere else, the Royals could afford to give up their 1st round pick because they'd have the sandwich pick due to Gordon's departure.

KevB 01-05-2016 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeepSouth (Post 12001179)
Duncan, what about Wei Yin Chen? He might cost a little more than Kennedy or Gallardo but he had a good year in 2015.

I think Chen is going to cost quite a bit more, not a little more. Chen is clearly the more attractive option, but you can't look at the signing in a vacuum. Would you rather have Chen and Parra or Kennedy and Gordon?

KevB 01-05-2016 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anyong Bluth (Post 11992442)
Thank you. I get the feeling that people are looking at Gallardo as a much more attractive signing, but Kennedy has me more interested.

He seems cut of the same cloth of a number of Dayton type signings. It'll get 30 seconds of national attention, and he'll end up having a quiet but productive season.
I see no reason why he couldn't replicate a season similar to Edison.

That, gentleman, is a smart signing - especially for the dollars.

Agreed. The K/inning that Kennedy has thrown up the last few years is enticing.

Snapplez 01-05-2016 01:13 PM

I like Gallardo after having watched him frequently this past season. He's really just an inning eater, but he shined against the Blue Jays in the playoffs. If the money is right he'd be my choice.

WhawhaWhat 01-05-2016 01:16 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">After 6 rounds of chemo for lung cancer, dad got word today he&#39;s ALL CLEAR!!! Kids are going to… <a href="https://t.co/PvKWj7u5R4">https://t.co/PvKWj7u5R4</a></p>&mdash; Victor Rojas (@VictorRojas29) <a href="https://twitter.com/VictorRojas29/status/684444960611893249">January 5, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

DeepSouth 01-05-2016 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevB (Post 12001502)
I think Chen is going to cost quite a bit more, not a little more. Chen is clearly the more attractive option, but you can't look at the signing in a vacuum. Would you rather have Chen and Parra or Kennedy and Gordon?

I don't think the Royals will end up with Kennedy AND Gordon. If they retain Gordon, they do not get the sandwich pick. Since Kennedy would cause the Royals to lose their first round draft pick, I don't see it happening. If Gordon signs elsewhere, they could give up their first for Kennedy, since they are drafting so late, and have the sandwich pick.

Also, Parra is not tied to a Qualifying Offer. The Royals could have Parra and (Chen, Gallardo, or Kennedy) and still have the sandwich pick.

KevB 01-05-2016 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeepSouth (Post 12001556)
I don't think the Royals will end up with Kennedy AND Gordon. If they retain Gordon, they do not get the sandwich pick. Since Kennedy would cause the Royals to lose their first round draft pick, I don't see it happening. If Gordon signs elsewhere, they could give up their first for Kennedy, since they are drafting so late, and have the sandwich pick.

Also, Parra is not tied to a Qualifying Offer. The Royals could have Parra and (Chen, Gallardo, or Kennedy) and still have the sandwich pick.

The names could change. My point was that Chen is probably the most expensive pitcher on the market, and bringing on Chen would mean going much cheaper in the OF. Keeping Gordon means we go cheaper at P.

DeepSouth 01-05-2016 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevB (Post 12001691)
The names could change. My point was that Chen is probably the most expensive pitcher on the market, and bringing on Chen would mean going much cheaper in the OF. Keeping Gordon means we go cheaper at P.

I agree with your point. Chen will cost more which would affect the amount you can pay an OF.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.