ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs Geno Smith vs Alex Smith

That's nothing more than speculation to claim that Smith drops to the fourth. It's possible, because he clearly interviewed like ****ing shit, but I don't think that level of drop would have been likely.

And QBs with tools go early. Period. We learned that last year when ****ing Tannehill went #8 overall, which was absurd in many ways. But the new CBA has changed a lot.

That says a lot though doesn't it?

Qbs with tools go high, tannehill etc, yet geno and this class dropped like turds.

DaneMcCloud

09-06-2013 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9946295)

One: That's no answer.

Two: At least I have a pair.

And they're the size of a sunflower seed

Sweet Daddy Hate

09-06-2013 11:14 PM

This season is more than likely going to blow, and Alex will be right there with his lips firmly glued to the cocks of every opposing defense, leading the way.

Sweet Daddy Hate

09-06-2013 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 9946312)

I'm not in your fan base and I still think they were the right moves.

Yeah, if I'm a Donkey fan, I'm absolutely LOVING these moves!

DaneMcCloud

09-06-2013 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9946310)

Where do you think he should have gone? #20 overall? Then big deal. He was a first-round talent.

I hate that bullshit of, "I'd take him at #8, but not at #4."

Gabbert? Well, despite the media's obsession, probably third round, like Foles.

DeezNutz

09-06-2013 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9946309)

The new CBA changed the 2011 draft.

It didn't change the 2012 or 2013 draft.

Naturally I'm talking about post-CBA as a collective category, which it is. Cost is lower, and thus the risk is lower, too. You can turn and burn at QB without "killing the franchise," as so many Chiefs fans like to caution.

DeezNutz

09-06-2013 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9946313)

That says a lot though doesn't it?

Qbs with tools go high, tannehill etc, yet geno and this class dropped like turds.

It says Geno interviewed like a scrub, but it says exactly what I've been arguing relative to Manuel.

'Hamas' Jenkins

09-06-2013 11:16 PM

Signing Bray was throwing shit at a wall, hoping it stuck. It's not a bad plan, but it's not an especially viable one, nor one you should pot commit yourself to.

O.city

09-06-2013 11:16 PM

Monetarily, the risk is lower.

Sweet Daddy Hate

09-06-2013 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9946314)

And they're the size of a sunflower seed

http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f1...oBlue/HAHA.gif

:facepalm:

DeezNutz

09-06-2013 11:18 PM

Bringing in Bray would have been an intelligent move, even if the Chiefs had selected a QB anywhere in the draft.

Signing Daniel, however, wow. Dumb as ****ing shit.

DaneMcCloud

09-06-2013 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9946320)

No, the risk ISN'T lower.

GM's and head coaches are still at risk.

They have four years, MAX. If it doesn't turn around, they're gone.

Hammock Parties

09-06-2013 11:18 PM

Gabbert wouldn't have been a first rounder in the 2013 draft, but only because the post RGIII/Luck draft climate is so ****ing stupid.

O.city

09-06-2013 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9946322)

Signing Bray was throwing shit at a wall, hoping it stuck. It's not a bad plan, but it's not an especially viable one, nor one you should pot commit yourself to.

Had we drafted him in the third, would it have made a difference?

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:51 PM.

Page 147 of 436

147