Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5529137)

WTF are you doing here?

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 5528917)

unfair ..... Curry wasn't used as a pass rusher

he got 3 sacks per year just in his normal linebacker duties

but ..... it is a concern

much like Sanchez's lack of experience, Curry's lack of experience as a pass rusher makes it a difficult judgment taking him so high in the draft.

the difference is that even if Curry doesn't develop as a stud pass rusher he could still be a stud linebacker, which he's already shown.

Sanchez, on the other hand, is boom or bust.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5529161)

I couldn't let the BEST OFFSEASON EVER pass without talking to SOMEBODY about it.

My wife just rolls her eyes when I walk in the door every night after walk and shout "PIOLI!"

:D

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 5529174)

HA!!!

*cough, cough* btw didn't i call this Pioli thing about 5 years ago? :evil:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5529260)

You always were the eternal optimist. ROFL

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5529334)

YAAAAAAY PARKER!!!

KISS ME

Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5529164)

:whackit:

http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/n...HOSTOFTODD.gif

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5529373)

ROFLROFLROFL

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 6687774)

The Kurt Warner things is interesting. In STL, he had a solid line, great back, great receivers. In AZ (I know they didn't win, but they did everything but win), he had no backs, no line, and a pretty porous D. It was basically Warner and his receivers that just about ended up Super Bowl champs. How does one account for an interesting talent like him? Should he have been drafter higher?

Originally Posted by H5N1 (Post 6687776)

he wasn't drafted at all, IIRC