![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
...if he can be shown otherwise, than I can see him accepting a ProBowl guard's contract. The party line around here is that he is a saviour at LT (which may be true) but if he knows better and the coaches know better... then it isn't such a stretch. Again... I don't believe it... but you can't dismiss it out of hand as if you know better. No one does... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
a LT is selfish for wanting to be a LT? people are in some kind of deep ****ing denial "if LT's won't play guard for the Chiefs, they're selfish...." |
Quote:
|
Quote:
he's a LT is you ask him what he is, he is not going to say, "i'm a guard playing LT but I hope to be a guard again some day".... this literal fantasy on this thread...he'll be a LT for the Chiefs or he'll be a LT for someone else and still no one can tell me why in the hell he would do otherwise? |
Quote:
Just saying that I am not gonna jump on someone for throwing a legitimate possibility out there (not one I am advocating mind you, but it is POSSIBLE) |
Quote:
Dumb. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Look the only way picking Monroe remotely makes sense is if the team has all of these things lined up..
They are committed to keeping both of them and paying 2 OT's alot of money down the line, that's the only way it works. If they think there's not gonna be a cap then it doesn't become as much of an issue... |
Quote:
OK homer. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If the Chiefs draft Monroe they have to be committed to paying 2 Tackles a ton of money or Albert won't be here when his 1st contract is up. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.