ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Tyson Jackson (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=214574)

DaneMcCloud 09-20-2009 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6094102)
The whole team sucks even Mike Brown was bad.

Blasphemy!

Titty Meat 09-20-2009 07:16 PM

Is there 1 veteran Pioli signed that has played good either game? Vrabel meh, Brown played 1 good game, Wade played good, the rest have sucked.

Chiefless 09-20-2009 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by macdawg (Post 6094079)
I wish we could have gotten an elite pass rushing LB with the 3rd overall pick or traded down instead of getting a DE to tie up blockers.

Jesus Curry was the only viable LB to take at #3. He has 8 tackles and no sacks on the year. Seems like this draft was a dud for defensive playmakers at the top of the draft. I would bet Pioli tried like a MFer to trade out of #3 to pick up Jackson later in the draft but couldn't find anyone willing to move up to pay 60mil for marginal talent...thus he took his player early. It was a sh*tty hand he was dealt IMO.

milkman 09-20-2009 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6094117)
Is there 1 veteran Pioli signed that has played good either game? Vrabel meh, Brown played 1 good game, Wade played good, the rest have sucked.

Vrabel has played smart, but that is about the best you can say about any of the offseason acquisitions in free agency.

So far, Bobby Wade is the only player signed that played at a level that we can hope that we look back at as a good signing.

RedThat 09-20-2009 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6094117)
Is there 1 veteran Pioli signed that has played good either game? Vrabel meh, Brown played 1 good game, Wade played good, the rest have sucked.

I think it's important to keep in mind, these veteran guys Pioli signed are here for 2 reasons:

1. the chiefs were a young team w/ no veterans. There was too much of an imbalance going on. The team had a roster full of kids, and that need to change.

2. I believe it was to patch up Carl and Herms mess. Really. I mean the roster was so devoid of talent and still is. it could make a bit of a slight difference having some of these veterans on the team rather then having some of the scrubs that were here before? The bleeding was so bad, they had to at least try and slow it down.

I still think though the draft is the best route for this team to add talent. Its gonna realistically take this team maybe 3 or 4 years to be a good team provided they draft well. Hopefully, Pioli hired some good scouts. Were gonna need them to do their homework.

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-20-2009 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6094104)
That's one play.

I honestly can't believe after reading Hootie's posts about how DMAC is the next AP, and how this Raider team was great at run blocking that people want to continue to rag on the run D.

I don't give a shit what Cable did. I don't care what could have happened.
The Chiefs run defense did their job today. Dorsey played a very nice game and Jackson contributed as well.

Do I think he's worth the 3rd overall pick? No way. But am I going to complain every week about his production? No. If you know anything about the 3-4, the DE's are about as unsexy as a position there is in the stat book.

I for one, said nothing of Jackson in this thread. I've actually defended him through the first two games, even though I believe it was a god awful use of resources given the position he plays. He's the least of our problems.

Kyle DeLexus 09-20-2009 08:08 PM

I wish I had never opened this thread.

aturnis 09-20-2009 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6094068)
Hali, Corey Mays and DJ, minus the sack.

Where were these guys?

Oh, that's right.

Getting their asses pwned.

Between:

Hali
Vrabel
Johnson
Williams
Beisel
Mays

The LB's stat line ready 7 tackles, 1 sack.

Pathetic.

doomy3 09-20-2009 08:30 PM

I missed it during the game, but who had the sack on the play that Gilberry got called for the PF Penalty?

Reaper16 09-20-2009 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6094454)
I missed it during the game, but who had the sack on the play that Gilberry got called for the PF Penalty?

The Raiders' RG.

doomy3 09-20-2009 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6094460)
The Raiders' RG.

Really?

I wondered because on the radio, they didn't announce it at all. Just said Russell was sacked, then explained that Gilberry hit him late, etc.

Reaper16 09-20-2009 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6094470)
Really?

I wondered because on the radio, they didn't announce it at all. Just said Russell was sacked, then explained that Gilberry hit him late, etc.

ESPN's boxscore has Gilberry with that sack.

RedThat 09-20-2009 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6094108)
Vrabel was playing patti cake all day.

There's also no reason that DeMorrio Williams should continute to start over Derrick Johnson.

This I do not understand.

doomy3 09-20-2009 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6094480)
ESPN's boxscore has Gilberry with that sack.

Yeah, I just looked it up after I asked the question. Thanks for the answer.

Weird that he could get a late hit penalty on a sack he got credit for...

aturnis 09-20-2009 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 6094488)
This I do not understand.

I think it's been going on b/c either Johnson doesn't know his assignments, or tried to freelance too much.

Either way, if he is in the wrong spot, we get gashed. Haley's thinking must be that even though Williams isn't as gifted a player, if he does his job, he'll be better for the team.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.