Why do you think that?

So, now you want to move the goalposts to make yourself feel better and put more words in my mouth?

I hated the Jared Allen trade, that doesn't mean Pioli should have kept rolling with the ****ing 4-3 after he was gone does it, idiot?

JFC <---------see how I did that?

Just quit while your behind!

you want the answer in ink or crayon?

In response to the OP........NO. Never going to happen.

Where's that link for the statement you keep making about the Packers offering 2 1st round picks for Larry Johnson? You can post it in your favorite lipstick for all I care.

Pollard was solid? Now we have people defending Pollard and arguing KC should have stuck with him? Where was this support 2 months ago?

rushbacker lol

I already answered you, I had it bookmarked on my old computer and couldn't find it again, only one saying they offered a 1 and 4, I retracted the statement because I couldn't prove it. I love how a statement I made once now has turned into "keep making" though...

I would have traded him for just a 1 at the time, I would link my posts from back then to show that was my stance, but it was before my time here and the CC crashed and had to restart everything a year and a half ago.

Boy would that 1 would look good right now (assuming we wouldnt have just wasted the pick anyway)!

somewhat witty, huh!

Hey, you won't find me in the camp that wanted to replace Pollard NOW.

Down the line, sure. That would hopefully be DaJuan Morgan. But the Chiefs had MUCH greater needs on defense than replacing Pollard.

And they sure didn't need to go backwards, which is exactly what they have done.

not on this board.

I defended Pollard in the preseason when he wasnt playing well and I got three neg reps for my effort, I decided not to pursue that further.

I posted the link to the Texans site where I started an account and asked them how Pollard was doing and all the "supporters" came out of the woodwork.

No, it's really reeruned. You say it all the time and I make fun of it all the time. There is no such position as "rushbacker"
All of your arguments are terrible and you consistently make yourself look like a moran.

Go away.

The rolb in a 3-4 is basically the same as a rde in a 4-3 with a few more responsibilities, rushing the passer is the main responsibility as well as setting the edge in stopping the run. Hence my use of rushbacker in place of rolb.

your welcome!

now **** off!

Look I know you had some grand idea that it would catch on and everyone would be saying rushbacker and you would feel really cool. But it's not happening and again you just look sad and reeruned like every single argument I have seen you make in this thread.

He makes all kinds of silly arguments that don't stick.

I have no idea how the guy has any green.