i added RB in my edit, and you're right about TE, i just forgot...that would make 15

He went full reerun while quoting mel brooks. How sinful. I don't see how drafting three olineman makes it a gold draft. Fact is, you have three people acclimating to the nfl and one person learning a new position while not upgrading his old position.
Posted via Mobile Device

"This post makes the baby jesus weep"

This is one of the times I wish ROR was still here, he would have a field day with this thread and it would be fun to watch.

Four linemen. We are completely revitalizing and upgrading the single worst position as a group in this theoretical draft. At the same time, we are upgrading and improving our linebacking corps and safeties. I don't see how there can be a single complaint with this proposed draft by anyone. Everybody gets what they want, and the Chiefs get immensely better immediately. We get our WR in 2011. We get the best LT, G, C and one of the best RT prospects, along with a quality pass rusher and big thumper in the middle, and two new, athletic, fundamentally sound safeties.

I think it's absolutely brilliant.

I'm still enjoying this thread because I think the Chiefs will have Charles Brown as their top OT.

How dense can one person be? Do you have uranium for a skull?
Posted via Mobile Device

Also Kyle Calloway will be lucky to go in the 3rd at this point.

I have to think they are pleased with alberts improvement, versatility, and maleability. If they take brown, it will be for depth and they can't reach for depth, imo.
Posted via Mobile Device

I'm not putting anything past these guys, they've already shown they really could careless about the players they inherited.

:shake:

Holy ****.

:shake:

I think the biggest problem with our oline is cassel. He got put on his back more than 40 times behind the pats oline. Meanwhile, charles was the best back in the league for half a season. Hmmm.
Posted via Mobile Device

Eeewwwww. That's not good, dude. At all. The O-line play improved sooooo much by the end of the year. Albert is not the problem. Cassel is. The lack of playmakers is also the problem.

Even when Cassel had time to throw the ball he still couldn't find a target. A better QB will make that line look ass-loads better. Just look at what JC did for the o-line.

I want Clausen. But that won't happen. So fix the D. Gimme Berry of McClain in the 1st. Another playmaker at 2a, and a Center in 2b.

This. Cassel Sucks. Hopefully Wies drafts his boy and starts him right away.

Clausen may be a rook, but at least he can hit a wide open target.....

I would say that's debatable. He was only sacked 15 times in the last 8 games, as opposed to 27 in the first 7. And he was dropping back a bit per game more the second half of the year than the first. I'd say a lot of factors played into the first half of the year, ranging from problems with the blocking scheme, installing a new offensive system, total lack of a running game, and so on.

I would also go on to say that while the line did improve to a degree, it was not as drastic as Charles' performance would seem to indicate. Because much of the time he was making yards on his own (in a way I don't think anybody expected him to, at his size; he showed an amazing capacity for running through contact). In the passing game, even in the second half of the year, the "protection" was often a turnstile, especially in the middle. The play of the center and guards was not very good a lot of the time.

Which is separate from the fact that Cassel was making mistakes on his own late in the year, even on the occasions when the blocking was there...