ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Peter King: You have to go back to 1997 to find a draft like this one (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=270181)

htismaqe 02-19-2013 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 9417421)

ROFL

http://c-product.images.dreamsretail...44-15652-Y.jpg

htismaqe 02-19-2013 09:39 PM

OK, who the **** is Jose Gumbs?

http://shop.kcchiefs.com/Kansas-City...588386_PG.html

O.city 02-19-2013 09:39 PM

htis, did you get my PM?

htismaqe 02-19-2013 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9417448)
htis, did you get my PM?

When?

Send it again.

DaneMcCloud 02-19-2013 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 9416462)
I will probably take a few years off if they don't draft one this year.

No, you won't.

:p

O.city 02-19-2013 10:18 PM

Dane, finished reading that book you recommended, thanks.


Any other recs?

DaneMcCloud 02-19-2013 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9416501)
I know you and I differ on this but the reason I care about how we acquire the QB is because I believe it is a factor on whether or not we can win in the first place.

I have always believe that the only way to consistently win Super Bowls is through the draft. And it's not just QB's, it's stockpiling CB's, DE's, LB's, WR's, etc. Perimeter guys that make a true difference in the game.

But at this point in time, if the Chiefs can acquire a QB that is ready to lead this team to the playoffs for the next 3-4 years consistently, I don't care how he's acquired.

This teams has so many pieces in place that IF they can acquire an accurate passer and leader on offense, this team can make some noise. Maybe, just maybe, some serious noise.

So as I've stated before, if it's Foles or Smith or Flynn or G. Smith or someone else, I'm in. This team is ready.

Especially on defense.

htismaqe 02-19-2013 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9417742)
I have always believe that the only way to consistently win Super Bowls is through the draft. And it's not just QB's, it's stockpiling CB's, DE's, LB's, WR's, etc. Perimeter guys that make a true difference in the game.

But at this point in time, if the Chiefs can acquire a QB that is ready to lead this team to the playoffs for the next 3-4 years consistently, I don't care how he's acquired.

This teams has so many pieces in place that IF they can acquire an accurate passer and leader on offense, this team can make some noise. Maybe, just maybe, some serious noise.

So as I've stated before, if it's Foles or Smith or Flynn or G. Smith or someone else, I'm in. This team is ready.

Especially on defense.

That's just the thing. Foles is as much an unknown as any of the QBs in this draft. Flynn isn't even worth discussing. And Alex Smith's history doesn't necessarily scream "serious noise".

The 1995 team was "ready", especially on defense. This sounds EXACTLY like that. And we already know how that ended. In both 1995 AND 1997.

DaneMcCloud 02-19-2013 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9417781)
That's just the thing. Foles is as much an unknown as any of the QBs in this draft. Flynn isn't even worth discussing. And Alex Smith's history doesn't necessarily scream "serious noise".

The 1995 team was "ready", especially on defense. This sounds EXACTLY like that. And we already know how that ended. In both 1995 AND 1997.

Foles is unknown to you, not the head coach.

This defense is as championship ready as half the playoff contenders in 2012, if not more.

This team is ready to strike. All they need the right QB to lead them.

BossChief 02-19-2013 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9417781)
That's just the thing. Foles is as much an unknown as any of the QBs in this draft. Flynn isn't even worth discussing. And Alex Smith's history doesn't necessarily scream "serious noise".

The 1995 team was "ready", especially on defense. This sounds EXACTLY like that. And we already know how that ended. In both 1995 AND 1997.

Andy Reid knows quite a bit about Foles and Dorsey knows quite a bit about Flynn.

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-19-2013 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotCarl (Post 9417101)
You can't really argue that this is the weakest QB class in a long time. The only reason these QBs will go in the first is that the league is so QB-centric now.

yep, its good that the league is no longer drafting or thinking like Carl Peterson. It's even better that the Chiefs will soon be joining them. Pioli accomplished one thing: no more Carl. And the Lord looked, and saw that it was good.
Posted via Mobile Device

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-19-2013 11:54 PM

Its about compromise, not previous knowledge. Im sick of compromising. All this franchise DOES is compromise. It's time to stop taking it in the ass, and start GIVING IT. No more ****ing excuses.
Posted via Mobile Device

HemiEd 02-20-2013 03:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9417715)
No, you won't.

:p

yeah, you are probably right. :banghead:

HemiEd 02-20-2013 03:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9417921)
Andy Reid knows quite a bit about Foles and Dorsey knows quite a bit about Flynn.

Rinse and repeat. Pioli knew a lot about Cassel.

Sorry, just been burned to many times, I am going to live in Missouri soon so they are going to have to show me.

HotCarl 02-20-2013 06:08 AM

Foles was a third round pick, but where would he be in this draft?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.