ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football NFL eyeing proposal to abolish extra points (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=280812)

cosmo20002 01-21-2014 01:25 PM

Remember when the goalposts were on the goal line? I don't, but I saw it on TV. Players kept cracking themselves on it so they moved it to the back of the end zone.

I wonder if there was a shit storm then about players being pussies and ruining the game by making FGs longer.

cosmo20002 01-21-2014 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 10385083)
Abolish Roger Goodell-problem solved

Why would that make a difference? Will the new commissioner not act as the owners want him to?

tomahawk kid 01-21-2014 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 10385083)
Abolish Roger Goodell-problem solved

God - so much of this.

That SOB just HAS to mess with EVERYTHING.

cosmo20002 01-21-2014 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tomahawk kid (Post 10385133)
God - so much of this.

That SOB just HAS to mess with EVERYTHING.

The owners must really be shocked at everything he is doing to screw with the game. They are defenseless against Goodell, who apparently is the boss of the owners.

tomahawk kid 01-21-2014 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10385149)
The owners must really be shocked at everything he is doing to screw with the game. They are defenseless against Goodell, who apparently is the boss of the owners.

It sure didn't seem like as many things were being changed, or considered to be changed, under Paul T.

cosmo20002 01-21-2014 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tomahawk kid (Post 10385156)
It sure didn't seem like as many things were being changed, or considered to be changed, under Paul T.

You probably just don't remember, and a lot of the rule stuff is related to concussions which didn't really emerge as the major issue it is now until after Paul T. Point is, NONE of this stuff--rule changes, adding teams to the playoffs, what days games are played-- is done without explicit approval from the owners, and they likely suggest a lot of it. He is carrying out their wishes.

We can only imagine the kind of stuff that is suggested behind the scenes. I'd be surprised if there weren't at least proposals for TV games every night of the week, adding a couple rounds to the playoffs, teams in Mexico and London, and who knows what else.

Not that I'm a Goodell fan or anything, I just think the blame should go to where it belongs.

GloryDayz 01-21-2014 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10385149)
The owners must really be shocked at everything he is doing to screw with the game. They are defenseless against Goodell, who apparently is the boss of the owners.

They are neither shocked nor defenseless, they are simply money-whores who are paying him well to take the heat for moves that might somehow lead to more money. But I think you already knew all of that.

ChiliConCarnage 01-21-2014 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sannyasi (Post 10383467)
If the extra point did not already exist, there would not be single person arguing in its favor.

This is a really salient point. If the game currently existed with every team going for two after a touchdown nobody would argue for a boring single automatic point kick to be added.

Either way, kicking in general has become too good. Ryan Succop had the 28th best kicking accuracy this season. That put him 12% better at kicking FGs than Jan Steneruds career average.

Just in the last decade there has been a huge jump. This year Rob Bironas was the 20th most accurate FG kicker at 86.2%. In 2002, that would have placed him as the 5th most accurate. That includes the fact that there are far more 50+ yarders taken this season.

Kickers haven't missed a kick inside of 40 yards yet in the playoffs.

BigMeatballDave 01-21-2014 03:11 PM

I don't really care about the PAT.

Also, I used to have a lot of anger towards Goodell.

After thinking about it, he's only doing what the owners want him to do.

BigMeatballDave 01-21-2014 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10385149)
The owners must really be shocked at everything he is doing to screw with the game. They are defenseless against Goodell, who apparently is the boss of the owners.

LMAO Come on, man. You gotta be smarter than this.

morphius 01-21-2014 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 10384731)
If you believe wikipedia, the extra point was once worth more than a touchdown. You scored a touchdown to get the opportunity to kick an extra point.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convers...iron_football)

The try/convert is among the oldest parts of the game of gridiron football and dates to its rugby roots. In its earliest days, scoring a touchdown was not the primary objective but a means of getting a free kick at the goal (hence why the name "try," more commonly associated with rugby today, is still used in American football rule books), and thus early scoring rubrics for the game gave more points to the subsequent kick than the actual advancement of the ball into the end zone. The related term "conversion" is still used in both rugby union and rugby league to refer to extra points scored by kicking the ball through the posts after a try has been scored.

By the start of the 20th century, touchdowns had become more important and the roles of touchdown and kick were reversed. By this time the point value for the after-touchdown kick had reduced to its current one-point value while the touchdown was now worth five. (This later increased to six points in American football in 1912 and in Canadian football in 1956.)[citation needed]

So we could take the rugby rule and where you score is where you kick from. So a fade corner route would lead you being stuck kicking it from the sideline.

(I believe it is where the player is forced to put the ball down in the try in rugby area is where you kick from on the field)

cosmo20002 01-21-2014 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 10385529)
LMAO Come on, man. You gotta be smarter than this.

Well, I was being sarcastic if that's what you mean. Goodell acts on behalf of the owners.

GloryDayz 01-21-2014 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10385620)
Well, I was being sarcastic if that's what you mean. Goodell acts on behalf of the owners.

You, sarcastic??? No!!!!!!!!!!

BlackHelicopters 01-21-2014 04:10 PM

The owners are trying to maximize revenue any way possible. If eliminating the extra point is profitable, they will find a way to make it happen.

alnorth 01-21-2014 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bowener (Post 10385072)
Narrow the goalposts by 3' on each side, making them 12'6" wide, and add another 10' at the top, and raise the bottom bar to 12' (which stops the stupid dunks). Have extra points be kicked from a hashmark of choice by the opposition. That would be a pretty extreme angle at 2 yards.

This would also make 60+ field goals much more difficult by raising the bar (literally). And I would like to add the extra 10' at the top to help take the error of human element out of the refs hands.

This all seems much more logical than doing away with the PAT.

Or we can just get rid of the stupid PAT.

There is no logical reason for the PAT to even exist, other than "we always had it".


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.