![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm still quite sour on smiff, but you're right... Trent might not have fared so well behind this trainwreck. |
Quote:
Why? Because Chiefs. |
Quote:
It's like when Matt Cassel stepped in for Tom Brady for a year. Moss and Welker on the field and he throws for 3600 yards. Because that's just who he is. And the same is true for Alex Smith. He is who he is, and blaming it on Bowe, in particular, is a disservice to a guy who not only should by all rights be posting 1200 yard seasons, but who we should love more right about now because he's totally being the team guy and not throwing tantrums left and right because his quarterback isn't getting him the ball - like the diva that so many people were saying he was back when he was double-thumbing his back and talking about the Bowe Show. But hey, Bowe hate has been a favorite pasttime of some for years, no reason to change now. |
Quote:
|
I totally understand what most everyone is saying ... but, if not Smith, then who?
Who? Derek Carr ****ing sucks everyone. Teddy Bridgewater? Ok, maybe. Maybe. But it's not like he's some lock and also, what's his ceiling? Franchise QB? Yeah, don't think so. and if we did draft these guys ... did you want them to play this year? You really think either one of these dipshits would have excelled behind the worst offensive line I've ever seen in the history of watching the Chiefs? I am just curious ... It's not like Reid or Dorsey has passed on 1 QB that, to me, looks like they'll ever amount to jack shit in the NFL. ...MAYBE Bridgewater. Geno Smith? Give me a ****ing break. |
Alex Smith is in the 12-18 range.
He absolutely is in the same tier as Joe Flacco, Matt Stafford and Andy Dalton. Absolutely. Is that something that I'm content with? **** no. I think Alex Smith is boring. I was bored watching Alex Smith never take a single risk. But Joe Flacco and Matt Stafford behind that offensive line? Yeah. 4 wins. Maybe. It would have been awful. |
Anybody who still thinks Green and Smith are the same guy isn't even worth the energy it takes to type a response at this point. I'm out.
|
Quote:
|
and I'd absolutely, 100% rather have Alex Smith for 2 2nds over Derek Carr. Anyone who watched Derek Carr this year and wants to try and tell me he'll be a good NFL starting QB, or even a guy who starts more than another year ... should stop watching football.
That dude has NO chance. |
Quote:
He's a decent #2, and if he was in Green Bay he would be #3 behind Nelson and Cobb. If he's in Detroit, he's #3 behind Tate and Johnson. If he's in Chicago, he's #3 behind Marshall and Jeffreys, if he's in Washington, he's #3 behind Jackson and Garcon; if he's in San Fran, he's probably #3 behind Boldin and Crabtree, in Jacksonville, he might be #2, behind one of their younger, faster, more talented youngsters - get the picture?? |
Quote:
It's not just that they could have/should have gotten someone better. It's that they could have expended FAR fewer resources to get a similar QB (Carson Palmer, Ryan Fitzpatrick and Kyle Orton, to name three guys who put up very similar figures as Alex Smith this season). Maybe they win 10 games last year and 7 games this year with those guys at the helm instead, but that's not a big deal. The team also would have had the benefit of two more high-round, premium talent picks (one basically a first-round pick), which probably would have helped. Alex Smith? Or Kyle Orton + Keenan Allen + Gabe Jackson? Alex Smith is a stop-gap, whether his fanbois and the Chiefs front office realize it or not. There were cheaper options out there. |
Quote:
Seriously. I am not trying to be a dick. I just seriously cannot even begin to fathom your opinion. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.